Klitschkos would be just as dominating in the 60s and 70s

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Anyone who agrees is the bastard child of the KlitchWHOs and have no sense of dignity.

Yes, I am a fat American and proud of it.

[Mersey]

Anyone who disagree is hater and have no sense of reality.

Or they know a bit about boxing.

[mECHsLAVE]

People have said this for many years now. It's true, just very unpopular.

It's difficult for boxing fans to get their head around it, but the 1-2 Vitali-Wladimir would be too much for probably any champ/contender that I can think of in the 60's and 70's. They might make it by one of the bros, if there was a freak thing (torn rotator, panic attack, etc), or if Foreman got one of them in trouble early, etc. But for the most part, it would be domination by them.

I mean, I love Joe Frazier, but if you thought his head was swollen after the Ali fights... well, he'd be unrecognizable...

[Benncollinsaad]

Only if a guy like Earnie Shavers got a little lucky could Wlad and Vitali get beaten. Wlad more likely.

[Rickety Cricket]

Anyone who disagree is hater and have no sense of reality.

Give this Klitschko **** a rest already, for real.

[Mersey]

Of course it is possible, but to say that you either think that or you don't know boxing is rediculous.

[The_Demon]

nobody would have heard of them back then
they would have been decent sparring partners
thats about it

[Benncollinsaad]

nobody would have heard of them back then
they would have been decent sparring partners
thats about it

No Lewis nuthuggers please!:gay:

[Junito-Rulez]

They would be good fighters in the 70s but no way they would dominate. IMO they could be A level guys but still would lose to Larry Holmes, Ali, Foreman and Frazier. They would be on Ken Norton's level.

[The_Demon]

No Lewis nuthuggers please!:gay:

im not a lewis nuthugger
if i was i would be here saying he would dominate the 60's and 70's,whereas i live in the real world and know he wouldnt
you are the delusional nuthugger
you fail
once again