Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiaos Achievements Are Blown Out Of Proportion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Boxing Fiend View Post
    *Juan Manuel Marquez- I dont care what the score card or official tally is. Out of the 24 rounds they fought JMM easily won 16 of those. Manny has every physical advantage over JMM but still gets countered like silly and beaten to the punch by a fighter who is 36 and alot slower. I honestly believe in both encounters that JMM beat him.
    and of course both fights jmm fought pacquiao he was 36 right?

    marquez isn't even 36 yet.

    they fought last year and 5 years ago. you do the math.

    the fights were a draw and a split decision win. it could have gone either way.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Boxing Fiend View Post
      * David Diaz- Him lets see jump up to 135 and face either marquez, cassamayor, campbell, katsidis, or Juan diaz...Nope ill fight the bob arum promoted sitting duck known as david diaz. Of course manny looked good @ his only fight @ 135. David Diaz cant crack worth a damn, has slow feet and horrible form . Easy Pickings, He gets no love for fighting the weakest belt holder in the division.
      david diaz was a top 5 ranked lightweight.

      he was one of only 2 guys that had belts at the time. he had the wbc and juan diaz had the rest.

      juan diaz lost to campbell before pacquiao even fought marquez at 130 yet.

      nate campbell didn't get a belt 'til he beat juan diaz the month pacquiao fought marquez.

      katsidis wasn't really in the picture yet. he got his name out there after the war with casa which took place after they already planned a diaz fight.

      pac just fought marquez at 130.

      david diaz was a good , solid fight for his 1st fight at 135.

      most people take a tuneup in a new weight division. pacquiao's was a top 5 ranked fighter with a belt. not bad i say.
      Last edited by Left Hook Tua; 04-30-2009, 06:01 AM.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR View Post
        Hating at his best right here.
        not really.

        whoever wrote that does NOT follow boxing.

        they were off on a lot of timing of fights.

        revisionism of what really happened.

        Comment


          #24
          malgiaggi is better then david the paper champ diaz.....malginaggi is the one underrated, while diaz is clearly overrated

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
            malgiaggi is better then david the paper champ diaz.....malginaggi is the one underrated, while diaz is clearly overrated
            lmao

            you're comparing one of ricky's best wins to one of pacquiao's tuneups?

            is david diaz even in the top 10 of pacquiao's wins?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
              malgiaggi is better then david the paper champ diaz.....malginaggi is the one underrated, while diaz is clearly overrated

              LOL.....i havent heard anyone overating DDD.......never.............

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                lmao

                you're comparing one of ricky's best wins to one of pacquiao's tuneups?

                is david diaz even in the top 10 of pacquiao's wins?
                i'm just saying he picked diaz to get a belt, period....the only reason hatton fought malginaggi was because paulie was the number 2 ranked jr. welter.....

                BIG difference, who fights and who chooses opponents.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by strugler View Post
                  LOL.....i havent heard anyone overating DDD.......never.............
                  if anything david diaz is underrated.

                  the guy is one tough sob with a few good wins (santa cruz , erik morales , emmanuel burton) and his only losses were to holt at 140 and manny pacquiao.

                  not bad at all. not great but he ain't a bum.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by strugler View Post
                    LOL.....i havent heard anyone overating DDD.......never.............
                    i have heard left hook tua in here say david diaz is underrated....funny stuff ever

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                      if anything david diaz is underrated.

                      the guy is one tough sob with a few good wins (santa cruz , erik morales , emmanuel burton) and his only losses were to holt at 140 and manny pacquiao.

                      not bad at all. not great but he ain't a bum.
                      the morales decision was highway robbery.....holt has a below average chin....david diaz is a guy that got lucky to win the wbc lightweight title....a footnote in history

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP