Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiaos Achievements Are Blown Out Of Proportion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
    i'm just saying he picked diaz to get a belt, period....the only reason hatton fought malginaggi was because paulie was the number 2 ranked jr. welter.....

    BIG difference, who fights and who chooses opponents.
    and what was hatton's reason for fighting urango and collazo and maussa?

    don't be ignorant. you're embarassing yourself.

    if you want to say you think hatton will beat pacquiao , that's fine.

    don't try to make it out like ricky has a better resume or something. that's just dumb.

    ricky has beat ONE guy that was in the top 10 p4p list in ONE fight.

    manny has beat 3 guys that have been top 10 p4p fighters in 5 fights.

    ricky has had belts in 2 divisions.

    manny has had belts in 5 divisions.

    ricky has had 1 lineal belt.

    manny has had 3.

    you can't even compare the 2.
    Last edited by Left Hook Tua; 04-30-2009, 06:27 AM.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
      i have heard left hook tua in here say david diaz is underrated....funny stuff ever
      Well he was wbc champion......................His chin is definitely underated imo.........some may compare diaz's style of fighting with hatton pissing you guys........... hattons obviously better in every aspect except the chin(imo).....Hattons footspeed and ability to to cut the ring is often overlooked...........PLease tell me you had such high regard for pAULie before the hatton fight?.................

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
        and what was hatton's reason for fighting urango and collazo and maussa?

        don't be ignorant. you're embarassing yourself.

        if you want to say you think hatton will beat pacquiao , that's fine.

        don't try to make it out like ricky has a better resume or something. that's just dumb.

        ricky has beat ONE guy that was in the top 10 p4p list in ONE fight.

        manny has beat 3 guys that have been top 10 p4p fighters in 5 fights.

        ricky has had belts in 2 divisions.

        manny has had belts in 4 divisions.

        ricky has had 1 lineal belt.

        manny has had 3.

        you can't even compare the 2.
        all those guys you named hatton beat anally **** little paccy....urango was undefeated at the time...maussua was recognized as a legit jr, welter at the time, unlike diaz at lightweight.....and collazo would face murder charges if he fought pacman

        sure pac has the better overall resume.....

        and deserves credit for winning, but people do blow his "hall of fame" status up....best hall of fame wins are MAB 1 and the Marquez wins....the rest are just wins to add to the W column.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
          the morales decision was highway robbery.....holt has a below average chin....david diaz is a guy that got lucky to win the wbc lightweight title....a footnote in history
          i saw the morales fight. it wasn't highway robbery. it could have gone for morales but no way is it a robbery.

          what does holt's chin have to do with anything? holt beat diaz.

          and maussa , urango , collazo.....what are they in boxing history? were they legends of the sport when hatton won the meaningless trinkets from them?

          what was urango's biggest win? what was collazo's? has maussa even won a fight since he fought ricky?

          you need to watch and read more about boxing if you want to debate boxing related subjects , bud.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            if anything david diaz is underrated.

            the guy is one tough sob with a few good wins (santa cruz , erik morales , emmanuel burton) and his only losses were to holt at 140 and manny pacquiao.

            not bad at all. not great but he ain't a bum.


            I really thought PAC would have a harder time against diaz..being Pacs debut in LW and all................D.Diaz chin is definitely underated......and his heart too....

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by strugler View Post
              Well he was wbc champion......................His chin is definitely underated imo.........some may compare diaz's style of fighting with hatton pissing you guys........... hattons obviously better in every aspect except the chin(imo).....Hattons footspeed and ability to to cut the ring is often overlooked...........PLease tell me you had such high regard for pAULie before the hatton fight?.................
              actually i did...i expected paulie to give hatton problems....i didnt expect the beat down

              Comment


                #37
                The easiest thing to do nowadays in boxing is to downplay a boxers resume, You can do it to any boxer and the resume would look empty.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
                  all those guys you named hatton beat anally **** little paccy....urango was undefeated at the time...maussua was recognized as a legit jr, welter at the time, unlike diaz at lightweight.....and collazo would face murder charges if he fought pacman

                  sure pac has the better overall resume.....

                  and deserves credit for winning, but people do blow his "hall of fame" status up....best hall of fame wins are MAB 1 and the Marquez wins....the rest are just wins to add to the W column.
                  yes urango , collazo , maussa were all great wins because they would whoop pacquiao in your imagination.

                  answer my question. what was urango , collazo and maussa's biggest wins?

                  well?

                  Comment


                    #39
                    highway robbery......marquez/pac 2.....you a nuthugger if you think differently

                    - Associated Press:114-113 Marquez
                    - Joe Santoliquito:115-112 Marquez
                    - Dan Rafael, ESPN.com: 114-113 Marquez
                    - Darius Ortiz, ESPN.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Eric Raskin, ESPN.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Brian Kenny, Friday Night Fights:115-112 Marquez
                    - Scott Mallon, Ring ****zine / Boxing News / The Fist / Boxing Digest:114-113 Marquez
                    - Yahoo Sports:115-112 Marquez
                    - Fight News.com:115-112 Marquez
                    - Steve Carp, Las Vegas Review Journal: 114-113 Marquez
                    - Norm Fraunheim, Arizona Republic:114-113 Marquez
                    - Rich Marrotta, Top Rank TV:114-113 Marquez
                    - Kieran Mulvaney, Reuters:114-113 Marquez
                    - DogHouseBoxing:114-113 Marquez
                    - Brett Conway, MaxBoxing.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Rick Reeno, krikya360.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Gary Randall, MaxBoxing.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Bart Barry, 15Rounds.com:115-113 Marquez
                    - Bruce McTavish, International Judge:115-112 Marquez
                    - Francis Ochoa, Philippine Daily Inquirer:114-113 Marquez
                    - Scott Christ, BadLeftHook.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - William Detloff, The Ring ****zine:115-113 Marquez
                    - Ron Borges, TheSweetScience.com:114-113 Marquez
                    - Bert Sugar:Marquez
                    - Max Kellerman & Bob Papa:Marquez in both fights

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                      yes urango , collazo , maussa were all great wins because they would whoop pacquiao in your imagination.

                      answer my question. what was urango , collazo and maussa's biggest wins?

                      well?
                      i told you pac has the better resume, but hatton would kill all those guys pac fought too if they tried to fight at 140....

                      and its not that i think...its i know those guys would **** pac with the exception of maussa

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP