Originally posted by true warrior!!!
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miguel Cotto Says "Margarito Should Be Banned For Life"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dave Rado View PostI don't need to believe you or anyone else, I just look at the facts.
The fact is that it is far away from Margarito's situation, because nothing was proved in Tito's case. Tito was proved to have incorrectly wrapped hands (which is all they mean by "illegal wraps"), but nothing more. However, in terms of what was alleged by Fisher, it is not far away from Margarita's case at all. Fisher alleged that the way his hands were illegally wrapped turned his hands into lethal weapons, comparable with the effect of plaster in the wraps. That is a very serious allegation, which should have been investigated and wasn't. If the allegation was unfounded, then it would have been in Tito's interests for it to be investigated, because it would have cleared his name.
Those three fighters have never taken an unnecessary punch from anyone in their entire careers. That's a silly argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mazukamba2904 View PostThat was Fishers opinion, not the BC, of course Fisher can say all he wants to make Trinidad look bad, but in Margaritos case they found blocks and in those blocks were the ingredients of plaster of Paris, very, very different and every boxer doesn't want to be hit, not only does three and what I want you to understand is that they felt Titos power and they new that if they traded with him it was going to be over. You need to make sens of what you say because there is a lot of separation between Tito and Margo, on Tito you only have Fishers opinion against him and on Margo you have the hole Boxing world against him. Do I make my self clear.
The point is that Fisher's allegation was never investigated and it should have been.
If it had been investigated and found to be false, Tito would have benefited because his name would have been cleared.
If it had been investigated and found to be true, then, and only then, it would have been comparable to Margarito.
But it was never investigated.
But it should have been.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chicano79us View PostI wish more people on here were like you.
Its just discusting how you and guys like you call Cotto a "quitting *****", but in fact the guy in your avitar quit against a much smaller guy. Also Morales, one of my all time favorites, quit against pac. Vazques quit against Marquez. What do you expect these guys to do? take more unnessesary punishment and risk the possibility of a long term damage in order to prove something to YOU? I'm sure none of the give a f uck about you, since apparently you don't give a f uck about them or their health.
By the way I give Cotto the benefit of the doubt in this situation, since the other scumbag was caught trying to cheat. Cotto has never been known for ducking anyone, in fact he was going to rematch the cheater before he got caught. I would love to see the rematch, but if Cotto doesn't I would completely understand and won't hold it against him. He is fighting Clottey next, a very tough fight that everyone was avoiding. I see Mosly, Berto, and Pacman/Hatton in the near future too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Rado View PostYou're missing my point.
The point is that Fisher's allegation was never investigated and it should have been.
If it had been investigated and found to be false, Tito would have benefited because his name would have been cleared.
If it had been investigated and found to be true, then, and only then, it would have been comparable to Margarito.
But it was never investigated.
But it should have been.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Williamb45 View PostI'm glad more pople on here are not like you.
Its just discusting how you and guys like you call Cotto a "quitting *****", but in fact the guy in your avitar quit against a much smaller guy. Also Morales, one of my all time favorites, quit against pac. Vazques quit against Marquez. What do you expect these guys to do? take more unnessesary punishment and risk the possibility of a long term damage in order to prove something to YOU? I'm sure none of the give a f uck about you, since apparently you don't give a f uck about them or their health.
By the way I give Cotto the benefit of the doubt in this situation, since the other scumbag was caught trying to cheat. Cotto has never been known for ducking anyone, in fact he was going to rematch the cheater before he got caught. I would love to see the rematch, but if Cotto doesn't I would completely understand and won't hold it against him. He is fighting Clottey next, a very tough fight that everyone was avoiding. I see Mosly, Berto, and Pacman/Hatton in the near future too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pistol whip View PostEL Rancho means the country you know that right?
If you are making that in refrence to Margarito well Tijuana is not EL Rancho because it's a city. Maybe you might want to brush up on your Mexican slang before you try to use it.
no kid!!
when I say el rancho I mean
back to el rancho ball room!
Comment
-
i got to say it seems as if cotto has been holdn back for quite sometime and even though a life time ban is a bit extreme you can argue the case. 1 yr is ridiculous though fighter take 1 yr breaks so that's nothing. i would pay 100 bucks to see cotto vs margo 2.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rayzah View Posti got to say it seems as if cotto has been holdn back for quite sometime and even though a life time ban is a bit extreme you can argue the case. 1 yr is ridiculous though fighter take 1 yr breaks so that's nothing. i would pay 100 bucks to see cotto vs margo 2.
That's just on PPV.
Comment
-
I don't blame Cotto for saying this even though we don't know if Marg used them against him or not.
Bottom line is, Marg has ruined his career with this and it's very sad.
Comment
Comment