Originally posted by raycorey
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Poll: Hamed Likely Won't Make it into the IBHoF in 2009
Collapse
-
Originally posted by raycorey View Post
LOL i guess that has to be the answer really because i dont see what else he actually did/acheive apart from being a human punching bag.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Bringer View PostHe'll eventually get the nod, but damn near nobody gets in the first year they're eligible. This cry of injustice by Naz fans is ludacris in my opinion.
Yeah i think he would get in around 2011, I think people thought since he didnt get in now he wouldnt get in forever.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostI hate most boxing writers. Such phony pompous windbags. I wonder how many of the ones that don't vote for Hamed will vote for Arturo Gatti? What a travesty.
Neither Gatti nore Hamed deserve it. I like Gatti but it's the sad truth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KostyaTszyu44 View Postyou have to be kidding me
i know gatti is far more likeable than hamed and had many great fights but come on, he was pretty average skill wise and didnt achieve a hell of a lot...(when you compare his achievments to other guys on the elite level im saying, he did achieve a lot by most standards)
hamed was tremendously skilled and talented, and he achieved heaps. he should be a shoo in HoFer
If I had to chose one.. which I don't think either deserve it but if I did have to chose one and only one of those two it would be Gatti.
Comment
-
Of course Hamed deserves to get in, he unified all the belts held them for a long time, his only loss was to Barrera. He also did a lot for the sport, He pretty much single handedly got people into the low weight classes so the fighters could enjoy big paydays.
I think his ****y persona and the way he finished in the sport puts a lot of people off him, but it shouldnt take away from what he achieved. IMO a lot of people mustve been too young to truly appreciate how big Naz was when he was around and the impact he had on the sport.
Comment
Comment