Choicefully choosing of boxers comments, is what the article did. The daily mirror of articles it was. But then it has to be, or does it?
Whilst in contradiction to Calzaghe I think Hopkins i being under hyped, this does in contrary seem to over hype Nard. Not sure how much to derive from it, other than carefully selected comments from boxers with ulterior motives in what they say.
I've got Pavlik by clear UD in a somewhat messy fight.
Whilst in contradiction to Calzaghe I think Hopkins i being under hyped, this does in contrary seem to over hype Nard. Not sure how much to derive from it, other than carefully selected comments from boxers with ulterior motives in what they say.
I've got Pavlik by clear UD in a somewhat messy fight.
Comment