Calzaghe: "Pavlik is Full of Bull****, Overhyped Fighter"

[bsrizpac]

Actually Pavlik has beaten one better fighter. He hasnt beat anyone else worth a ****. The only name which seperates their records is the overrated Taylor.

In terms of skill, I think theres a much bigger gulf in Kessler's favour.

Lol, he might be overrated to your dumb ass, but we've all seen how much you know about boxing. Taylor is Taylor, a good fighter with a bad head. Still leaps better than anyone Kessler has beaten. Sorry that hurts you so much.

PS, sometimes one win is what defines a legacy, much like your idol Joe Calzaghe who keeps big upping Kessler as his win.

So yeah my point still stands. Get back to me when kessler has beaten anyone worth a ****.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lol, he might be overrated to your dumb ass, but we've all seen how much you know about boxing. Taylor is Taylor, a good fighter with a bad head. Still leaps better than anyone Kessler has beaten. Sorry that hurts you so much.

PS, sometimes one win is what defines a legacy, much like your idol Joe Calzaghe who keeps big upping Kessler as his win.

So yeah my point still stands. Get back to me when kessler has beaten anyone worth a ****.

No he's overrated to most people who watched him get outlasted and beat up by a 40 year old Hopkins when he was 25. To those who watched him get outboxed by Winky Wright. To those who watched him struggle to come to terms with two welterweights who he surely would have dominated if he was acutally "leaps better".

[bsrizpac]

No he's overrated to most people who watched him get outlasted and beat up by a 40 year old Hopkins when he was 25. To those who watched him get outboxed by Winky Wright. To those who watched him struggle to come to terms with two welterweights who he surely would have dominated if he was acutally "leaps better".

So once again, he was outlasted by Hopkins at 40 even though he was a young fighter who if you recall took the fight much earlier in his career than most experts and analysts thought he should have. And yet, years later, when Joe looks like **** against Hopkins and basically has to resort to flurrying like a huge jackass against the Grandpa, people like you claim it's an awesome win. Yeah, okay. Gotcha.

Meanwhile, you still have yet to name anyone on Kessler's fight list worth a ****, even compared to 'overrated' Taylor. Yeah? Thought so.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So once again, he was outlasted by Hopkins at 40 even though he was a young fighter who if you recall took the fight much earlier in his career than most experts and analysts thought he should have. And yet, years later, when Joe looks like **** against Hopkins and basically has to resort to flurrying like a huge jackass against the Grandpa, people like you claim it's an awesome win. Yeah, okay. Gotcha.

Meanwhile, you still have yet to name anyone on Kessler's fight list worth a ****, even compared to 'overrated' Taylor. Yeah? Thought so.

Actually most people were grooming the guy for greatness ala Jeff Lacy cos he KOed a few little men. If he was really the heir apparent, then surely he wouldnt be getting beaten up by Hopkins.

Where have I ever said Calzaghe had an "awesome win" against Hopkins? Whenever you are getting destroyed by me in a debate, you move on to inventing things in your head (Calzaghe KO Hagler, Floyd - Castillo, racist being prime examples).

Calzaghe won pretty clearly if not convincingly. Taylor didnt win either clearly nor convincingly. I dont even think he won at all.

I already said Taylor is the only name that seperates the two. But if he struggles against welterweights, I have no doubts that the likes Mundine, Beyer and Andrade would give him a fight..........who by the way are all better than anyone else on Pavlik's record.

[IMDAZED]

Actually most people were grooming the guy for greatness ala Jeff Lacy cos he KOed a few little men. If he was really the heir apparent, then surely he wouldnt be getting beaten up by Hopkins.

Where have I ever said Calzaghe had an "awesome win" against Hopkins? Whenever you are getting destroyed by me in a debate, you move on to inventing things in your head (Calzaghe KO Hagler, Floyd - Castillo, racist being prime examples).

Calzaghe won pretty clearly if not convincingly. Taylor didnt win either clearly nor convincingly. I dont even think he won at all.

I already said Taylor is the only name that seperates the two. But if he struggles against welterweights, I have no doubts that the likes Mundine, Beyer and Andrade would give him a fight..........who by the way are all better than anyone else on Pavlik's record.

No one was grooming Taylor for greatness when he fought Hopkins - in fact, every one thought it was MUCH too early for him. Especially following his one-sided but unimpressive performance against an aged William Joppy.

IN FACT, it was a SHOCK that Taylor's handlers would even let him face Bernard after 20 fights.

We know you're full of it but sometimes the stench is so unbearable I'm compelled to throw the bull**** out.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No one was grooming Taylor for greatness when he fought Hopkins - in fact, every one thought it was MUCH too early for him. Especially following his one-sided but unimpressive performance against an aged William Joppy.

IN FACT, it was a SHOCK that Taylor's handlers would even let him face Bernard after 20 fights.

We know you're full of it but sometimes the stench is so unbearable I'm compelled to throw the bull**** out.

Just like no one was grooming Lacy for greatness after a sloppy one-sided victory over Reid.

Taylor was HBO's Golden Boy. In fact, the lucky decision he got was probably based around the fact he'd been groomed for greatness.

American revisionist history always cracked me up.

[IMDAZED]

Just like no one was grooming Lacy for greatness after a sloppy one-sided victory over Reid.

Taylor was HBO's Golden Boy. In fact, the lucky decision he got was probably based around the fact he'd been groomed for greatness.

American revisionist history always cracked me up.

Whether he was being groomed or not, the general consensus was that Hopkins was too much WAY too soon.

Get it? Or are you too slow?

I guess because HBO was grooming Andre Berto they shoulda put him in against Pretty Boy Floyd in his 10th fight.

Dumb ass.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Whether he was being groomed or not, the general consensus was that Hopkins was too much WAY too soon.

Get it? Or are you too slow?

I guess because HBO was grooming Andre Berto they shoulda put him in against Pretty Boy Floyd in his 10th fight.

Dumb ass.

The general consensus? Yeah sure, just like everyone really knew Lacy was overrated all along.

Was Hopkins his 10th fight? And was Floyd 40 years old?

[abadger]

So once again, he was outlasted by Hopkins at 40 even though he was a young fighter who if you recall took the fight much earlier in his career than most experts and analysts thought he should have. And yet, years later, when Joe looks like **** against Hopkins and basically has to resort to flurrying like a huge jackass against the Grandpa, people like you claim it's an awesome win. Yeah, okay. Gotcha.

Meanwhile, you still have yet to name anyone on Kessler's fight list worth a ****, even compared to 'overrated' Taylor. Yeah? Thought so.

The thing is, Calzaghe really didn't look like **** against Hopkins, that's just hype. The fight was not a technically pleasing one, and Calzaghe had trouble getting his boxing going, but in the fight as it happened, Calzaghe won pretty clearly. You have to fight the fight you are in.

[IMDAZED]

The general consensus? Yeah sure, just like everyone really knew Lacy was overrated all along.

Was Hopkins his 10th fight? And was Floyd 40 years old?

Why do you keep bringing up Lacy? That's how many posts in a row now? God, you're just like you're idol - bringing him up for no good reason.

Hopkins wasn't in his 10th fight.

Floyd wasn't 40...and?

NEXT.

I swear, these losers all need a hug...