Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roy Jones Jnr v Bernard Hopkins NOW!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
    well at least ur not that ridiculous
    ridiculous or ree****yaluss?

    Haha

    Comment


      #12
      Judging by their last performance, I think Roy would win. If Hopkins was in his middle to late 30's, I think he wins.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Joshua Clottey View Post
        Judging by their last performance, I think Roy would win. If Hopkins was in his middle to late 30's, I think he wins.
        You think Jones taking a UD over trinidad is a better performance over Hopkins losing an SD to Calzaghe

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by GreatJoe View Post
          You think Jones taking a UD over trinidad is a better performance over Hopkins losing an SD to Calzaghe
          Yeah I think he looked bad against Calzaghe. Jones still has his reflexes & legs, he can still ****.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Joshua Clottey View Post
            Yeah I think he looked bad against Calzaghe. Jones still has his reflexes & legs, he can still ****.
            Yea can you imagine what that Hopkins would have done to Trinidad.

            It dun even bare thinking about

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by GreatJoe View Post
              Yea can you imagine what that Hopkins would have done to Trinidad.

              It dun even bare thinking about
              Hopkins is older now, but he would have definitely whooped Trinidad.

              Comment


                #17
                Am I the only person alive who still sees hand speed, pretty good reflexes(not as good in his prime, and nor should they be(40 years old) even now and a good counter puncher when watching Roy Jones Jr.? In his prime he was a 100 on rating skill...now hes more like an 75-80. Hes still pretty good...

                why can't an old fighter still be good, obviously hes no longer great because hes 40 years old.

                I think Roy would win against Hopkins now for the same reasons I would pick him in their primes. Roy is still faster than Nard, he also lets his hands go more than Nard. (even now)Also you make the argument Roy is still more athletic than Nard even now. Also, you have to figure, you would definitley see the best Roy Jones Jr.(at 39) you could ever possibly see because its against Hopkins. Roy wouldn't want to lose to Hopkins and vice versa.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by GreatJoe View Post
                  You think Jones taking a UD over trinidad is a better performance over Hopkins losing an SD to Calzaghe
                  Jones all day. It will be as ugly and annoying as hearing Joe Calzaghe say "at the end of the day" one more ****ing time. Roy will out work grandpa hop, Simple as that.

                  Do you really hate Roy that much? lol You are a silly character that knows less about Roy Jones Jr than the average person that knows nothing of boxing that lives in Pensacola Florida.

                  sad.............

                  You should just stick to talking about your boy Joey....

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by TRUTH View Post
                    Am I the only person alive who still sees hand speed, pretty good reflexes(not as good in his prime, and nor should they be(40 years old) even now and a good counter puncher when watching Roy Jones Jr.? In his prime he was a 100 on rating skill...now hes more like an 75-80. Hes still pretty good...

                    why can't an old fighter still be good, obviously hes no longer great because hes 40 years old.

                    I think Roy would win against Hopkins now for the same reasons I would pick him in their primes. Roy is still faster than Nard, he also lets his hands go more than Nard. (even now)Also you make the argument Roy is still more athletic than Nard even now. Also, you have to figure, you would definitley see the best Roy Jones Jr.(at 39) you could ever possibly see because its against Hopkins. Roy wouldn't want to lose to Hopkins and vice versa.
                    no, I see your points.... SOME on here are just ******ed... Its ok because I dont make fun of ******ed people. So they can say what they want....

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Opening bell, Hopkins stands still, refusing to be the aggressor. Jones sidesteps and lays on the ropes with a high guard.

                      12 rounds later, no punches have been thrown, and hundreds have been crushed to death as the entire crowd simultaneously ran for the exit.

                      And it still wouldn't be as boring as Mayweather-Baldomir.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP