Originally posted by Burner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
what is the difference between calzaghe ducking pavlik and mayweather ducking cotto??
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Tuplick_shaKur View PostWhy couldn't Shane still be considered an Elite? He looks great at his age and he would give anyone in the division trouble (not sure about Williams). He is not his prime self, but he is still sharp and has some of his reflexes in tact.
Nothing from King, but the way you make it seem is almost as if Cotto hasn't done anything. And as far as a give & take fight, the Torres or Mosley fight seemed pretty tough to me.
Comment
-
Hopkins started out at LH, actually, was a natural LH. He lost his first pro fight, and went immediately down to lower weight classes where he could more easily compete. Also, I don't know why people seem to think Hopkins is a big puncher, even at middle or SM. His KO ratio is 66%, barely average, not what one would expect from someone nickamed "The Executioner".
Hopkins is a smart fighter who will try and pull a win at any cost that doesn't give a crap what anyone watching the fight thinks of it. Understandable, but not admirable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boofdatruth View PostShane is old okay. The sooner you believe that the better. As far as cotto, the torres fight proved he could win a shoot out. That was a good win. But i'm talking about beating a guy considered your equal. Cotto has not done that yet.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by VIVA MEXICO!! View Posti dont think calzage has faced any elite in his career. the closest is maybe hopkins but he was old already. and mayweathers best win was corrales right before he was going to jail. not that impressive.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stickman View PostHopkins started out at LH, actually, was a natural LH. He lost his first pro fight, and went immediately down to lower weight classes where he could more easily compete. Also, I don't know why people seem to think Hopkins is a big puncher, even at middle or SM. His KO ratio is 66%, barely average, not what one would expect from someone nickamed "The Executioner".
Hopkins is a smart fighter who will try and pull a win at any cost that doesn't give a crap what anyone watching the fight thinks of it. Understandable, but not admirable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostWhat's the difference between Calzaghe vs. Pavlik & Mayweather vs. Hatton?
Pavlik is completely unproven at LHW (or SMW for that matter)... right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by VIVA MEXICO!! View Posthatton looked like trash at welterweight against a weak fighter. pavlik fought at 166 against taylor and looked good. i dont think pavlik should fight over 168 right now and calzage is a coward if he wont come down to make the fight.
Calzaghe has been having a lot of trouble making 168 in his latter fights. They mentioned it in the Lacy fight, and have mentioned it in almost every 168 fight after. On the other hand, Pavlik is a big MW, but they have never mentioned him having trouble.
Fair enough though. I was just curious what you thought.
By the way, would you have called Tarver out for ducking Hopkins had he not taken the fight?
Comment
Comment