Golota v Douglas ,who wins are the best day

[Dynamite Kid]

If you have the full broadcast and seen the fight more than once, how can you not acknowledge Buster's performance that night? Even if you ignore Tyson's problems, did you not see his ability that night? Everybody could see his skills, I keep repeating myself about his strategy, his punches etc but all you can say is "Oh Tyson wasn't in shape". If I was a rookie in this you'd have me confused because you went from being a Tyson hater to a biased Tyson homer LOL. There is only 2 things that can explain your posts regarding Douglass' greatness, it's that you're either too close minded/unknowledgable to see this, or you haven't seen the fight period. I personally think it's deeper than that. You love Rid**** Bowe and hate Mike Tyson, so you discredit Douglass and glorify Golota to make Bowe look good. I know that's it, but you won't come clean.



Objective is not making any excuses for Tyson, not having a biased agenda behind every post I make, and purely looking at the facts that have been given to us with footage. I have elaborated on this match-up before already, you haven't and couldn't dispute my claims on Buster's advantages over Golota. Now you're just speaking on irrelevant things. Neither Bowe or his damn speech pattern that you saw on Legendary Nights on Youtube has anything to do with this, or the fact that Tyson may have been unprepared and not at his best against Douglass. Because if that's the reason why Buster looked so good against Tyson, then Bowe being washed up is the reason why Golota looked so good against Bowe, isn't it? Talk Boxing with me or don't bother.

Douglas fought a good fight ,is that okay

regarding Douglas greatness , ,GREATNESS LMFAO

if i hate Mike Tyson how can i go from a Tyson hater to a Tyson Nuthgger it dont make any sense ,im not saying Golota would beat Douglas not once have i said that i was just trying to point out that Douglas would be fighting a different style of fighter than Mike Tyson so some of the advantages that he enjoyed over Mike that u pointed might not come into play in this fight ,thats not putting Mike down or Douglas its just u are that much of a nuthugger id either have to be Hating on Tyson or dismissing Douglas as a good fighter & we could'nt have your precious Mike being defeated by an ordinary fighter now could we cause that would be labelling him ordinary ,i knew u were a Tyson nuthugger ive read your post before i ddi'nt need to see your avator

Douglas was 'nt an ordinary fighter but he was'nt as good as good as an inshape Mike Tyson,i appreciate what Douglas did but i think it was more a case of what Mike was'nt doing im i lying when i say Mike Tyson movements looked slow & methodical am i lying saying his punch output was poor ,know im not

u are just a nuthugger & we both know it u try you put it on me when we both know it is u

how could'nt i dispute your claims on Busters advantages over Douglas u have never seen them fight for a start so where is the FACT there u could'nt get 2 more different oponents if u tried than Tyson & Golota

u are talking out your arse mate u just dont maske any sense ,u are aNUTHUGGER

[My Name Is...]

On their best day, Golota loses by DQ.

HAHAHAHa

Buster beats Golota all day every day in their prime

[The Troll]

HAHAHAHa

Buster beats Golota all day every day in their prime

no he wouldn't because Golota would probably establish his jab as the dominant and control the fight from there and he's also much stronger than Douglas and hits much harder.

[vandiar]

the douglas that beat tyson beats golata handily and easily.

[BKM-]

Douglas fought a good fight ,is that okay

regarding Douglas greatness , ,[SIZE="7"]GREATNESS LMFAO

As in how great he fought, not his legacy, genius.

if i hate Mike Tyson how can i go from a Tyson hater to a Tyson Nuthgger it dont make any sense ,im not saying Golota would beat Douglas not once have i said that i was just trying to point out that Douglas would be fighting a different style of fighter than Mike Tyson so some of the advantages that he enjoyed over Mike that u pointed might not come into play in this fight ,thats not putting Mike down or Douglas its just u are that much of a nuthugger id either have to be Hating on Tyson or dismissing Douglas as a good fighter & we could'nt have your precious Mike being defeated by an ordinary fighter now could we cause that would be labelling him ordinary ,i knew u were a Tyson nuthugger ive read your post before i ddi'nt need to see your avator

You need to speak up, I can barely understand you right now. Your grammar has decreased dramatically. I think it's because you got your panties in a bunch. You need to relax, THINK, then you can post and you won't look like an emotional child having a fit
Now, yet again ignoring my points that have to do with this topic and just cherry picking parts that you think you can respond to. Damn, you remind me so much of slicksouthpaw. You might be his alt, that's for sure.

Anyway, yes you did say that and I responded to that. However, Douglass' style that night was versatile enough to be effective against diffirent styles, not just a swarmer. He had a great jab and he could double or tripple up on it, fact. He had powerful hooks and uppercuts on the inside, fact. His accuracy together with his reach would make him more succesful in this matchup than Golota. He had the heart of a Lion so he would be there all night even if Golota catches him. I believe he would break him down in a close fight, slowly Douglass would break him down and stop him. Nothing unreasonable here.

I suppose you simply can't answer these, so you just go back to what anyone does in a losing argument, you become desperate and go back to calling me a nuthugger or biased. It's useless, I've made myself clear, so there's nothing left you can say that changes the fact that you lost this debate from the beginning.

Douglas was 'nt an ordinary fighter but he was'nt as good as good as an inshape Mike Tyson,i appreciate what Douglas did but i think it was more a case of what Mike was'nt doing im i lying when i say Mike Tyson movements looked slow & methodical am i lying saying his punch output was poor ,know im not

u are just a nuthugger & we both know it u try you put it on me when we both know it is u

how could'nt i dispute your claims on Busters advantages over Douglas u have never seen them fight for a start so where is the FACT there u could'nt get 2 more different oponents if u tried than Tyson & Golota

u are talking out your arse mate u just dont maske any sense ,u are aNUTHUGGER

[/QUOTE]

LOL, come on man. This is almost unbearable. I'm the one that clearly said Mike Tyson was in his prime against Douglass, made no excuses whatsoever i.e. said NOTHING that a real nuthugger would say. But you, you're using the blueprint on Tyson excuses that every fanboy says when it comes to that fight. You've showed your bias and lack of knowledge on the sport.

Anyway, i'm done here and i've made my points. Douglass beats Golota on physical advantages and a good style that could work on him, and mentally he's also superior to the mental case Andrew Golota. Have fun with your smileys and childish remarks, please go on with this and make yourself look good.

[The Troll]

douglas would have to outbox the crap out of Golota for like 10 rounds in order to win. Golota can hurt Douglas at any point during the fight but it would be difficult for Douglas to hurt Golota. Tall order if your Douglas because your not going to be landing your left jab at will, Golota has a better jab, harder, very quick.

If your going to pick Douglas to win and you should, the one who beat Tyson it's because of his mental fortitute and focus he had to pull off the biggest upset.

[Dynamite Kid]

[QUOTE=Yaman;3129726]As in how great he fought, not his legacy, genius.

Anyway, yes you did say that and I responded to that. However, Douglass' style that night was versatile enough to be effective against diffirent styles, not just a swarmer. He had a great jab and he could double or tripple up on it, fact. He had powerful hooks and uppercuts on the inside, fact. His accuracy together with his reach would make him more succesful in this matchup than Golota. He had the heart of a Lion so he would be there all night even if Golota catches him. I believe he would break him down in a close fight, slowly Douglass would break him down and stop him. Nothing unreasonable here.

I suppose you simply can't answer these, so you just go back to what anyone does in a losing argument, you become desperate and go back to calling me a nuthugger or biased. It's useless, I've made myself clear, so there's nothing left you can say that changes the fact that you lost this debate from the beginning.

losing an argument LOL i never said Golota would beat Douglas for a start u penis

u are a nuthugger we both know it ,that is why u jumped on my case straight away when i made any criticism of Douglas ,u would rather believe Douglas is such a great fighter than it reflect Mikes Frailties as a fighter ,oh BTW your opinion of Douglas beating Golota is exactly that opinion something u need be reminded of

cheers thanks very much

[mr.anthrax]

Golota wins rather comfortably, IMO.

Golota was a very underrated fighter with excellent boxing ability. His agility was very good for a big man, his jab was probaly the best since Larry Holmes, he had good head movement, a long reach, better than average power, and a respectable chin.

Golota was weak in the head but you ruled out the DQ possibility. I know Andrew didn't always have the best stamina, but it was still decent. A.G. seems to have self-destructed mentally against the big, scary punchers but I don't think Golota would fear Douglas. This is the type of fight Andrew would really look good in.

At the risk of losing whatever credability I might have on these boards, I could see Golota (not always actually winning) but looking good against guys like Norton, J. Johnson, Ali, Jimmy Young, Patterson, Tunney, etc, But I see him pissing his pants and running out of the ring against Foreman, Dempsey, V. Klitschko, Shavers, Louis, etc.

Douglass was a talented fighter too, someone whom often under-preformed for most of his career, but I just don't think he would beat Golota.

[Jim Jeffries]

The Douglas that beat Tyson beats any heavyweight in history.

But seriously, they're both journeyman, who cares.

The Golota that was schooling Bowe (better than Douglas was ever) before he took ****** pills beats Douglas.

[Motofan]

Golota was pretty good when he was on.