Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

I BEEN READY BlTCH. ARE YOU READY TO PROVE THE SCOPE. DON'T BACK OUT AGAIN


PROVE THAT I WAS LYING TO WIN THAT VOTE SON. PERMANENT BAN. I DARE YOU!!!!!

Travestyny CAUGHT!!!!!!

WHAT A LIAR!!!!



PROVE the SCOPE?

I thought you said that you ACCEPTED and WAITING for ME?

LIAR!!!!







The TOPIC is a DONE DEAL!!!!
They are based on the CAS PANEL's statements.

Travestyny thinks that those statements made by the CAS panel mean that EPO testing cannot have threshold type tests and whoever called it that is WRONG!!!!

ADP02: Believes that Travestyny is WRONG!


EXCLUSIONS:
- ABP testing
- Other non-threshold substances





Travestyny, what are we missing that the JUDGES need to see on this NEW CHALLENGE on this NEW TOPIC???






JUDGES: Reason for CHALLENGE?
We have been arguing this for OVER 2 MONTHs.


Is this a VALID reason? YOU BET!!!!



WHO are we waiting to ACCEPT the CHALLENGE: Travestyny!!!!!




.

[travestyny]

Travestyny CAUGHT!!!!!!

WHAT A LIAR!!!!



PROVE the SCOPE?

I thought you said that you ACCEPTED and WAITING for ME?

LIAR!!!!







The TOPIC is a DONE DEAL!!!!
They are based on the CAS PANEL's statements.

Travestyny thinks that those statements made by the CAS panel mean that EPO testing cannot have threshold type tests and whoever called it that is WRONG!!!!

ADP02: Believes that Travestyny is WRONG!


EXCLUSIONS:
- ABP testing
- Other non-threshold substances





Travestyny, what are we missing that the JUDGES need to see on this NEW CHALLENGE on this NEW TOPIC???






JUDGES: Reason for CHALLENGE?
We have been arguing this for OVER 2 MONTHs.


Is this a VALID reason? YOU BET!!!!



WHO are we waiting to ACCEPT the CHALLENGE: Travestyny!!!!!




.

WHY ARE YOU MAKING ME WRITE THE SAME THING IN TWO PLACES. ARE YOU UPSET THAT EVERYONE KNOWS YOU'RE A LIAR. LMAOOOOOOO



You said the Willy Wanker Challenge will prove I was lying and duped the judges in our past debate. Don't the judges have to know what the scope of our past debate was to decide that? THAT'S COMMON SENSE.


Yet you want them to blindly believe you instead of looking at the evidence. I WONDER WHY:


BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU'RE LYING ABOUT THE SCOPE OF OUR DEBATE. IT'S OBVIOUS. THAT'S WHY YOU KEEP BACKING DOWN FROM JUDGES LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE, PVSSY!

[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/TUHInIQM4bXBS/*****.gif[/IMG]

[ADP02]

WHY ARE YOU MAKING ME WRITE THE SAME THING IN TWO PLACES. ARE YOU UPSET THAT EVERYONE KNOWS YOU'RE A LIAR. LMAOOOOOOO



You said the Willy Wanker Challenge will prove I was lying and duped the judges in our past debate. Don't the judges have to know what the scope of our past debate was to decide that? THAT'S COMMON SENSE.


Yet you want them to blindly believe you instead of looking at the evidence. I WONDER WHY:


BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU'RE LYING ABOUT THE SCOPE OF OUR DEBATE. IT'S OBVIOUS. THAT'S WHY YOU KEEP BACKING DOWN FROM JUDGES LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE, PVSSY!

IT is a NEW DEBATE. NO CONFUSION!!!!!


You said that EPO testing CANNOT have threshold type tests. That should be simple enough for JUDGES to UNDERSTAND!!!!!


READY TO ACCEPT?

[travestyny]

IT is a NEW DEBATE. NO CONFUSION!!!!!


You said that EPO testing CANNOT have threshold type tests. That should be simple enough for JUDGES to UNDERSTAND!!!!!


READY TO ACCEPT?

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, IS TO PROVE THAT I WAS LYING ABOUT OUR DEBATE AND DUPED THE JUDGES, RIGHT?



OR ARE YOU NOW SAYING I WASN'T LYING AND DIDN'T DUPE THE JUDGES AND I LEGIT WON.


YOU SAID IT WAS RELATED TO THE PAST DEBATE. SO ARE YOU BACKTRACKING NOW. DO I HAVE TO CATCH YOU IN SOME MORE LIES YOU LITTLE BlTCH. I CAN GO GET THE QUOTATIONS IF YOU LIKE. LMAOOOOOO

SQUIRM SQUIRM SQUIRMMMMMM!

LET ME KNOW BRO LMAOOOOOOO!!!!!!
IF I LEGIT WON, YOU BETTER GIVE ME THOSE POINTS, BlTCH.
YOU CAN'T WIN!!!!

[ADP02]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, IS TO PROVE THAT I WAS LYING ABOUT OUR DEBATE AND DUPED THE JUDGES, RIGHT?



OR ARE YOU NOW SAYING I WASN'T LYING AND DIDN'T DUPE THE JUDGES AND I LEGIT WON.

LET ME KNOW BRO LMAOOOOOOO!!!!!!
IF I LEGIT WON, YOU BETTER GIVE ME THOSE POINTS, BlTCH.
YOU CAN'T WIN!!!!

REPEAT , RINSE!!!





IT is a NEW DEBATE. NO CONFUSION!!!!!


You said that EPO testing CANNOT have threshold type tests. That should be simple enough for JUDGES to UNDERSTAND!!!!!


READY TO ACCEPT?

[travestyny]

REPEAT , RINSE!!!





IT is a NEW DEBATE. NO CONFUSION!!!!!


You said that EPO testing CANNOT have threshold type tests. That should be simple enough for JUDGES to UNDERSTAND!!!!!


READY TO ACCEPT?

NEW DEBATE...NO CONFUSION????THERE WAS NEVER ANY CONFUSION TO BEGIN WITH, BlTCH. YOU GOT CAUGHT LYING ABOUT THE SCOPE AND NOW YOU DON'T WANT THE JUDGES TO LOOK INTO THAT OLD DEBATE! JUST ADMIT IT INSTEAD OF SQUIRMING LIKE A BlTCH! DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE JUDGES. THEY ARE GOING TO SEE THROUGH YOU LIKE SARAN WRAP!


AGAIN, THE PURPOSE OF THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE IS FOR YOU TO PROVE THAT I LIED AND DUPED THE JUDGES, RIGHT. OR ARE YOU BACKING OFF OF THAT NOW?


LET ME KNOW BlTCH. YOU CHANGE YOUR STORY SO DAMN MUCH BECAUSE YOU KNOW THAT YOU GOT CAUGHT LYINGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!


WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU TRYING TO SHOW I WAS CHEATING. DO YOU BACK DOWN NOW AND ADMIT THAT I DIDN'T CHEAT YOU. DID I LEGIT WIN. LET ME KNOW BRO. I'M WAITINGGGGGG

[travestyny]

Did you say this, adp....

stop pretending that there is no connection to the first debate. Of course there is a connection to the first debate.

or were you lying again? Are you going to step up and support your statement, or are you going to squirm, duck and deflect from it. Seems like you are now trying to distance yourself from our former debate. Doess that mean i got that win legit!


Waiting......

[travestyny]

Still waitingggggg. You offered the willy wanker challenge and i accepted. You don't want that anymore? What happened. Is it because you are afraid the judges will learn you are lying about the scope. Yea, i think that's what it has to be. Well, you should stop lying, bro. When you lie, you have to tell another, and another, and another. While all i'm saying is...the evidence speaks for itself! :d

[size="4"]

the willy wanker challenge


be a man, stop the ducking!!!!

let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

challenge accepted!

the willy wanker challenge:

You prove that the information in the bergman vs. Usada case proves that wada criteria have in place thresholds for epo testing with respect to the scope of our past debate.

I prove that the information in the berman vs. Usada case proves that wada criteria does not have in place threshold for epo testing with respect to the scope of our past debate.

if there is any disagreement about the scope of our last debate(which you have claimed plays a part in this debate), since you been lying about it over and over, and you got caught lying about it, we ask the judge to settle what was the scope of our past debate...because it damn sure wasn't 'can...' and you know i can prove that!

you already claimed that this 'willy wanker challenge' is related to our past debate, so now it's time for you to step up and prove it.


1. Permanent ban
2. All points
3. As per your former request and so that i know you are not going to welch out, you are to pass all of your points to the judge for safe keeping until the challenge is complete.

'willy wanker challenge' accepted. Do you want me to create the thread now or not? Waiting for your reply to get this over with.

and don't you dare think of ducking out!

WHO'S DUCKING THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE NOW, BIG SHOT. HUH? HUH????

[Zaroku]

Travestyny and I have been arguing over EPO testing and can EPO or other non-threshold substances have a threshold type test associated to its testing process?

Travestyny is saying no while I said yes.


Let me know if you are up to the challenge Travestyny.

I’m 54... years young... I’ll not make this about me.. my fav or it topic... let it go... you
Ike me have kids.. I got kids with 3 different wimmin..

I’m a low class *** ****.. for some reason drama always finds me..

I can’t keep up with your online battl3 with travesty...

I kinda believed I was not an idiot,...

As a ***, my ancestors murdered by ****s. if You ask me to re evalute pac vs

I Just wanna [want to worthy of sleeping next to my ancestors,.if when why ... my ppl ***s like me ... but smater* ( created, gifted you).

Acknowledge *** ppl no internet with out us..

I’m (nobody) other ***s look down on me.. I’m warrior *** garbage...

I’m big, mean,..,

[ADP02]

I’m 54... years young... I’ll not make this about me.. my fav or it topic... let it go... you
Ike me have kids.. I got kids with 3 different wimmin..

I’m a low class *** ****.. for some reason drama always finds me..

I can’t keep up with your online battl3 with travesty...

I kinda believed I was not an idiot,...

As a ***, my ancestors murdered by ****s. if You ask me to re evalute pac vs

I Just wanna [want to worthy of sleeping next to my ancestors,.if when why ... my ppl ***s like me ... but smater* ( created, gifted you).

Acknowledge *** ppl no internet with out us..

I’m (nobody) other ***s look down on me.. I’m warrior *** garbage...

I’m big, mean,..,

I can’t keep up with your online battl3 with travesty...

No problem … and that is part of my point when it comes to clarity. That is, even if you wanted to or cared, it would not be easy to follow … but Travestyny likes to "cloud" this up.


Summary:
Well, we are 70+ pages into this.

I challenged Travestyny on something that Travestyny cannot admit that he was WRONG and more importantly, he DUPED the judges in our previous debate with those statements.

By not accepting the Challenge, it means that Travestyny realizes that he is WRONG and CANNOT win. That is, he knows that he DUPED the judges!!!!

Now, after 70+ pages, it's NOT a good look for Travestyny!!!!


The work, from my end, has been done!!!!


Travestyny is found GUILTY!!!!





That is the short version