Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    You just stated with the cheating judges padding taken out, he barely won.

    A win that is barely... or a fluke, is still a win, and you admit it.

    Good job.
    No.. that's what you want to believe. That isn't what it was. Floyd won in Vegas. I am simply stating it was a fluke. As my epic thread has exposed.

    There was too much cheating and corruption. Don't be like Floyd Travesty.


    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Your new info proves that I cheated apparently. Ok. No problem.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
      No.. that's what you want to believe. That isn't what it was. Floyd won in Vegas. I am simply stating it was a fluke. As my epic thread has exposed.

      There was too much cheating and corruption. Don't be like Floyd Travesty.
      Are you aware of what a fluke is...?

      Comment


        Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Are you aware of what a fluke is...?
        Fluke
        1. Occurence based solely on luck or chance.


        1.That game was a total fluke. Nine times out of ten we would have beaten that team.


        In short, not a true win.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
          Fluke
          1. Occurence based solely on luck or chance.


          1.That game was a total fluke. Nine times out of ten we would have beaten that team.


          In short, not a true win.
          If Oliver McCall beat Lennox Lewis by luck...lucky punch or what have you....

          Is that a true win or not?

          Comment


            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            If Oliver McCall beat Lennox Lewis by luck...lucky punch or what have you....

            Is that a true win or not?
            I gave you a thorough explanation what a fluke win is. That's based on a dictionary, if you can't seem to fathom what it means. You need help. Buy some supplements to increase your brain IQ.

            In short it wasn't a real win.

            I made an epic thread to justify all the reason why Floyd's win was a fluke. You should know that by now. And this is not a place for that. This thread is ADP02 challenging you.

            Step up to the plate. I've already prepared my popcorn. Waiting for this show down.


            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Your new info proves that I cheated apparently. Ok. No problem.
            Last edited by Spoon23; 08-14-2018, 12:33 AM.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
              I gave you a thorough explanation what a fluke win is. That's based on a dictionary, if you can't seem to fathom what it means. You need help. Buy some supplements to increase your brain IQ.

              In short it wasn't a real win.

              I made an epic thread to justify all the reason why Floyd's win was a fluke. You should know that by now. And this is not a place for that. This thread is ADP02 challenging you.

              Step up to the plate. I've already prepared my popcorn. Waiting for this show down.
              No you didn’t. You added in the last part yourself. A lucky win is a win nonetheless. Did McCall beat Lewis or not?

              We are waiting for you to step up and prove who ducked

              Comment


                Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                No you didn’t. You added in the last part yourself. A lucky win is a win nonetheless. Did McCall beat Lewis or not?

                We are waiting for you to step up and prove who ducked
                Anyway, whatever you want to believe, you should worry about ADP02. He's ready are you?




                Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                Your new info proves that I cheated apparently. Ok. No problem.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                  Anyway, whatever you want to believe, you should worry about ADP02. He's ready are you?


                  Is he? Last time you mediated a proposal that I agreed to. What did he say? Can you remember?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    Your scared Travestyny wants to do the same Kangaroo court style debate. I had accepted that challenge 1.5 years ago. I was ready to do it AGAIN if he accepted this challenge and it would be with the same SCOPE and EXCLUSIONs that we had AGREED ON. No problem … BUT Travestyny said NO!!!!



                    OK ShoulderRoll,
                    I will then give my points on that bet + the wager for this new CHALLENGE to a 3rd party. Fair is fair. Travestyny wins, the 3rd Party will hand Travestyny all of the points. I win, I do not want anything from Travestyny. Just want my own points back.


                    Now it is Travestyny's turn to accept the challenge.


                    Now do you, Travestyny, ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE as PER THIS THREAD?

                    I even accepted the 2 exclusions that you requested.

                    That is more than fair ……..




                    .
                    Why do you keep calling it a kangaroo court?

                    You argue your points in front of neutral judges and agree to abide by their decision.

                    I think you just don't like it that all the judges voted against you. But that should tell you something about the holes in your logic, or about how you presented it.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      Are you aware of what a fluke is...?
                      Shhhhhh. Let him keep typing it.

                      ROFL

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP