Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

YOU ARE STILL GOING?????

THE THREAD IS MADE. JUST GO TO THE DAMN THREAD AND DEFEND YOURSELF!


//krikya360.com/forums/s...2#post19026202

YAWN...…

CLOWN,
Starting a thread does NOT PROVE that you accepted this CHALLENGE!!!!


UNLESS YOU ACCEPT THIS CHALLENGE, YOU PROVED MY POINT!!!!



DUCKER!!!!!

[travestyny]

HEREEEEEE PVSSY PVSSY PVSSY PVSSYYYYYYY.
OH, MR. BIG SHOT CLAIMING THAT I WAS LYIG AND CHEATING TO WIN VOTES. BUT NOW HE DON'T WANT TO SHOW UP TO PROVE THAT. 'WAHHHHHH WAHHHHHHH.' LMAOOOOOO. TAKE THAT, BlTCH. I PULLED YOUR HOE CARD AND YOU BACKED DOWN LIKE A SWEET PVSSY, DIDN'T YOU. GOOD GIRL!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

[ADP02]

YAWN...…

CLOWN,
Starting a thread does NOT PROVE that you accepted this CHALLENGE!!!!


UNLESS YOU ACCEPT THIS CHALLENGE, YOU PROVED MY POINT!!!!



DUCKER!!!!!

HEREEEEEE PVSSY PVSSY PVSSY PVSSYYYYYYY.
OH, MR. BIG SHOT CLAIMING THAT I WAS LYIG AND CHEATING TO WIN VOTES. BUT NOW HE DON'T WANT TO SHOW UP TO PROVE THAT. 'WAHHHHHH WAHHHHHHH.' LMAOOOOOO. TAKE THAT, BlTCH. I PULLED YOUR HOE CARD AND YOU BACKED DOWN LIKE A SWEET PVSSY, DIDN'T YOU. GOOD GIRL!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

Like usual, you have intentionally or unintentionally misinterpreted my post.


I said it a "BILLION" times.

You will NOT ACCEPT this CHALLENGE as per this THREAD's SCOPE.


You making another thread is NOT this CHALLENGE!!!


IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU????








You are cornered and have tried a "BILLION" ways to NOT DEFEND this.

Man, all you are doing is digging yourself a bigger hole!!!!


You are so so ready to start a different debate. NOT this debate!!! LOL


BUT 50+ pages ago, you couldn't do that.

The "honest" one is now saying, points is NOT an issue!!!



You are rewriting the book to DUCK!!!!




.

[travestyny]

Show up and defend these statements:

I told you why.

Willy Wanker was thinking that you were presenting something honest not a LIE!


YET you do not want to ACCEPT the CHALLENGE?

You couldn't tell WILLY Wanker the truth, hey? You had to LIE and CHEAT!!!!



I wanted to prove to you, me and everyone else that you would NOT have accepted the CHALLENGE and you did NOT!!!! and if you did, you would have lost anyways!!! You were trapped, Nowhere to hide but them roadblocks!!!!

Did you not post those CAS panel statements to the judges 1.5 years ago? Willy Wanker based it on your LIES YOU CHEAT!!!

As per Willy Wanker's comments, this was based on the case that was the key reason that Willy Wanker voted for Travestyny. I provided hard proof that Travestyny either misinterpreted what he said or he CHEATED and LIED to us all, knowing full well that he was WRONG and used that to simply get a vote or two.

BUT the common denominator is that it was all based on LIES and you CHEATING.
.

.

You give this to someone with little to no knowledge, you can get it passed them.

But, I put you back into your place!!!!



.

You even used the CAS Panel's statement in the first debate to get at least Willy Wanker to vote for you and possibly other judges.

He knows that he LIED and CHEATED. Because if he truly believed in what he said, the CHALLENGE would be on.



I'm calling it the WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE.

The dude has so far DUCKED the challenge! Imagine, he got WILLY WANKER to vote for him on this but now he is to SCARED to take on the same challenge!!!!

He CHEATED and LIED so that is why he cannot accept "THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE"

.

The only time that you didn't do that is when WILLY WANKER was duped into believing your LIES and CHEATING ways on a case from 2003 that barely mentioned WADA document as it was not even in effect yet!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

[ADP02]

Show up and defend these statements:

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

DEFEND?


There is PROOF that I wanted and I already got it!!!!
I said it from the start that YOU will NOT ACCEPT the challenge and you have NOT!!!!


78+ pages and waiting on the DUCKER, named Travestyny.




YOU NEED TO DEFEND YOUR STATEMENTS that you bragged about, DUCKER

Originally Posted by travestyny
IT TELLS YOU SPECIFICALLY THAT THESE CRITERIA ARE NOT THRESHOLDS, YOU IDIOT

TELL US, ADP. IF rEPO CAN EXCEED THE "THRESHOLD,"

Originally Posted by travestyny

I’ve stated over and over that the court stated that this is actually NOT a threshold. They stated it plainly. I’ve given you the quotations over and over.

Originally Posted by travestyny

The whole reason for the court case is because of that confusion. The athlete labeled it a threshold because the WADA experts have always said it was a threshold. He argued that you can’t get rid of this threshold. They said....it’s not a threshold.

And that is not the only time they said it’s not a threshold. They said it in more than one court case! Go look up those links too!!!

Originally Posted by ADP02
A few posts ago, you said that the BAP test was a threshold type test. ARE YOU WRONG?

Please explain

Originally Posted by travestyny
I've told you this a billion times in this very thread. The Panel stated clearly that the BAP is not a threshold test.

[travestyny]

STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO SHOW UP, BIG MOUTH. YOU SUDDENTLY DON'T WANT TO DEFEND YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT ME CHEATING, DO YA? LMAOOOOOO


THANK YOU FOR BOWING DOWN, BlTCH. THIS RIGHT HERE PROVES THAT YOU DON'T EVEN BELIEVE THAT YOU WON OR THAT YOU WERE CHEATED. YOU KNOW YOU GOT DECAPITATED!


//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013


AHAHA. YA DUMB BlTCH. ADP IS A PVSSY THAT WON'T SHOW UP!!!! PVSSY PVSSY PVSSYYYYYYY!


THAT WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE DOE. GUESS WHO IS AFRAID TO LET JUDGES KNOW ABOUT THAT SCOPE. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[img]//media.*****.com/media/hroV3K17Bodoc/source.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

DEFEND?


There is PROOF that I wanted and I already got it!!!!
I said it from the start that YOU will NOT ACCEPT the challenge and you have NOT!!!!


78+ pages and waiting on the DUCKER, named Travestyny.




YOU NEED TO DEFEND YOUR STATEMENTS that you bragged about, DUCKER

OHHHHH, MY BAD. I HAVEN'T BEEN READING YOUR MESSAGES. LMAOOOOO


THIS IS YOUR BIG REVEAL???? THIS IS YOUR CAN??????

IT TELLS YOU SPECIFICALLY THAT THESE CRITERIA ARE NOT THRESHOLDS, YOU IDIOT

TELL US, ADP. IF rEPO CAN EXCEED THE "THRESHOLD,"

SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT'S THIS WHOLE CAN BUSINESS???? LMAOOOOOOOOOO. Really?


How "can" it exceed the threshold in that case when they said 'THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH....'

SO AGAIN, SPECIFICALLY IN THAT CASE, YOU ARE ARGUING THAT THERE IS A THRESHOLD THAT IT CAN EXCEED. I'M ARGUING THAT THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THERE IS rEPO. EASY MONEY!

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. YOU ARE GOING TO ARGUE THAT IN THAT CASE, rEPO CAN EXCEED A THRESHOLD, RIGHT. I'M GOING TO ARGUE THAT IN THAT CASE THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THAT THERE IS rEPO.


DONE. ARE YOU READY TO GO ON THIS. I'M DEFINITELY READY!

[travestyny]

TOPIC: IN THE CASE OF BERGMAN VS. USADA, THERE EXISTS A THRESHOLD SUCH THAT ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THERE IS rEPO


I'M happy that we finally have this settled. You will argue yes.

I will argue no.


ANOTHER ONE OF YOUR CHALLENGES ACCEPTED. ARE YOU READY?

[ADP02]

OHHHHH, MY BAD. I HAVEN'T BEEN READING YOUR MESSAGES. LMAOOOOO


THIS IS YOUR BIG REVEAL???? THIS IS YOUR CAN??????






SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT'S THIS WHOLE CAN BUSINESS???? LMAOOOOOOOOOO. Really?


How "can" it exceed the threshold in that case when they said 'THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH....'

SO AGAIN, SPECIFICALLY IN THAT CASE, YOU ARE ARGUING THAT THERE IS A THRESHOLD THAT IT CAN EXCEED. I'M ARGUING THAT THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THERE IS rEPO. EASY MONEY!

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. YOU ARE GOING TO ARGUE THAT IN THAT CASE, rEPO CAN EXCEED A THRESHOLD, RIGHT. I'M GOING TO ARGUE THAT IN THAT CASE THERE IS NO THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH IT CAN BE SAID THAT THERE IS rEPO.


DONE. ARE YOU READY TO GO ON THIS. I'M DEFINITELY READY!

You are still squirming!!!!


It's not about the case but those statements that you said meant that there never was any threshold type tests for EPO. You said the WADA Experts had it WRONG! You said this a BILLION TIMES. Now you forgot about all of this?

I’ve stated over and over that the court stated that this is actually NOT a threshold. They stated it plainly. I’ve given you the quotations over and over.

The whole reason for the court case is because of that confusion. The athlete labeled it a threshold because the WADA experts have always said it was a threshold. He argued that you can’t get rid of this threshold. They said....it’s not a threshold. And that is not the only time they said it’s not a threshold. They said it in more than one court case! Go look up those links too!!!

You even compared 2002 vs 2010 case, remember?


There are so many posts from you on this …. well, it went on for 2 months!!!

Seems you backed off of your BAP talk.

I've explained this to you the same way the court explained it to the athlete. That you still can't understand is on you. The athlete never brings up threshold substances, but only points to a threshold for BAP. The court says clearly, there are no threshold criteria, because this is not a threshold substance. Just like I told you. You tried to then say there could still be threshold criteria because of the BAP, but the court shut you down!!!! You were pushing so hard on your BAP crap

DUCKard!!!!

[travestyny]

You are still squirming!!!!


It's not about the case but those statements that you said meant that there never was any threshold type tests for EPO. You said the WADA Experts had it WRONG! You said this a BILLION TIMES. Now you forgot about all of this?






You even compared 2002 vs 2010 case, remember?


There are so many posts from you on this …. well, it went on for 2 months!!!





DUCKard!!!!

WHAT THE FVVCK. I JUST ACCEPTED AND YOU ARE STILL CRYING. YOU ARE SUCH A BlTCH. I ACCEPTED SON. WHY DO YOU DUCK AND HIDE FROM EVERY FVVCKING THING. YOU ARE A COMPLETE PVSSY. SO YOU DON'T WANT THAT DEBATE TOO, HUH. YOU ARE DECLINING. IS THAT RIGHT?

I ACCEPTED. YOU ARE SAYING THAT THERE WAS A THRESHOLD IN THAT CASE, RIGHT? HOW COULD THERE BE A THRESHOLD IN THAT CASE WHEN.....THE COURT SAID THERE WAS NO THRESHOLD. LMAOOOOO. YOU ARE BACKING DOWN FROM YOUR OWN DAMN CHALLENGE. I THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT THAT COURT CASE. NOW IT'S NOT????? REALLY.


YOU ARE NOTHING BUT MY BlTCH. I OWN YOUR SOUL. F@GGOT

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]