Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

Backing out? I challenged YOU!!!

Man, you LOST ALL THAT CONFIDENCE? What happened? Thought I wouldn't challenge you? LOL


This was the statement that we have been arguing for over a month now.

and

May I remind you that it was YOU NOT ME who brought up this case and this statement on the BAP test for EPO!

Backing out???? LMAO


YOU BACKED OUT. WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THAT TOUGH TALK ABOUT YOU BEING RIGHT AND ME BEING WRONG. BUT YOU DON'T WANT THE REMATCH.



I'm just avoiding your DEFLECTIONS!!!!!


I'm too smart for you son. I know what you are trying to do. It's not going to work.


Oh, what is the threshold for the BAP.... if it has no numerical limit? Did you duck that

[travestyny]

HOLD UP. JUST READ ALL OF YOUR POST!

May I remind you that it was YOU NOT ME who brought up this case and this statement on the BAP test for EPO!

BINGO!!!!! FOUND THE DEFLECTION. BHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA



GIVE THE FVVCK UP! You LOSTTTTT!

Once again, we know why you ducked the question about the BAP not being in the TD2014EPO document 13 times before I beat this out of you!

If you ask me, the same exact criteria is not in the document
.

And now I know why you don't want to accept the rematch. Game over!

[ADP02]

Backing out? I challenged YOU!!!

Man, you LOST ALL THAT CONFIDENCE? What happened? Thought I wouldn't challenge you? LOL


This was the statement that we have been arguing for over a month now.

and

May I remind you that it was YOU NOT ME who brought up this case and this statement on the BAP test for EPO!

Backing out???? LMAO


YOU BACKED OUT. WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THAT TOUGH TALK ABOUT YOU BEING RIGHT AND ME BEING WRONG. BUT YOU DON'T WANT THE REMATCH.



I'm just avoiding your DEFLECTIONS!!!!!


I'm too smart for you son. I know what you are trying to do. It's not going to work.


Oh, what is the threshold for the BAP.... if it has no numerical limit? Did you duck that

no numerical limit? BAP?


Yes you have brought up all of this in the last month. You can bring up all of that in the challenge.

[travestyny]

no numerical limit? BAP?


Yes you have brought up all of this in the last month. You can bring up all of that in the challenge.

Don't play ******. You already saw the document that said "no numerical limit." Or was that because you had no eyes to see

You tipped your hand, son.

I wondered why your challenge didn't mention WADA, which first had the WADA Code in 2004

I wondered why you stated "Can have...," which was already shady as fvvck. LMAOOOOOO.

Let me guess. IOC right? LMAO. Dude, you lost. It's over. And what's the funniest part is that by refusing the rematch, you confirmed that even YOU know you lost.

It's over now.

R.I.P.

[ADP02]

DEFLECTO STRIKES AGAIN!!!


What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!



You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED scared to lose!!!



.



Previous challenge you finally admitted that ABP has threshold tests. SO WE ARE GOOD!!!


DEFLECTO is scared ....

Read above what you have been stating for the last month or so.



This is what I am challenging YOU on! Capisce? Comprende? Comprends-tu? Do YOU understand?

All you had to do is say, TRAVESYTNY IS WRONG!!!


You couldn't and kept on stating that you are right.

I am disagreeing with you and challenging YOU on this.



.

Don't play ******. You already saw the document that said "no numerical limit." Or was that because you had no eyes to see

You tipped your hand, son.

I wondered why your challenge didn't mention WADA, which first had the WADA Code in 2004

I wondered why you stated "Can have...," which was already shady as fvvck. LMAOOOOOO.

Let me guess. IOC right? LMAO. Dude, you lost. It's over. And what's the funniest part is that by refusing the rematch, you confirmed that even YOU know you lost.

It's over now.

This is about your statements!!!!

I said that YOU ARE WRONG TRAVESTYNY.

You said that you are right.


The challenge stands but it appears that you lost your confidence!!!


What happened? You now got that you cannot beat me in this challenge?


See, YOU WERE WRONG TRAVESTYNY!!! You know that YOU CANNOT WIN!

BECAUSE YOU ARE WRONG!!!!


The funniest part is:
- YOU brought up this case NOT me!
- YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!
- You are stating that the panel is saying that you are right BUT I keep on telling YOU that you have been misinterpreting it!!!!!



Now it appears that YOU ARE PYUSSING OUT!


TOLD YOU THAT YOU WERE WRONG!!!




TAKE THAT!!!! LOL
.

[travestyny]

This is about your statements!!!!

I said that YOU ARE WRONG TRAVESTYNY.

You said that you are right.


The challenge stands but it appears that you lost your confidence!!!


What happened? You now got that you cannot beat me in this challenge?


See, YOU WERE WRONG TRAVESTYNY!!! You know that YOU CANNOT WIN!

BECAUSE YOU ARE WRONG!!!!


The funniest part is:
- YOU brought up this case NOT me!
- YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!
- You are stating that the panel is saying that you are right BUT I keep on telling YOU that you have been misinterpreting it!!!!!



Now it appears that YOU ARE PUSSING OUT!


TOLD YOU THAT YOU WERE WRONG!!!




TAKE THAT!!!! LOL
.

What it appears is that you are trying to deflect by suddenly not mentioning WADA and going back to the BAP which you admit was not in the WADA TD2014EPO document.


So um....does your deflection work for WADA. Keep in mind....it didn't become business as usual til 2004. Didn't even get a threshold substances document until 2010 is it...? But no matter. The court told you what was up once WADA got to town.


Give up, son. It's over.


You're never going to recover from that 4-0 Asswhoopin, especially after what just happened now!!!!!

Poor poor ADP02. He thought he could get one over, but fell flat on his face, yet again!

[ADP02]

What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!

Why you scared then, ADP. I’m giving you a chance to not go down as a 4-0 loser.

You’ll go down as a 8-0 loser instead

Still running scared? Yea, that’s what I thought. Now shut up and keep ducking the challenge. You know you’ll get bodied in 1 page. Go cry about your loss to someone who cares.


EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?

Court of Arbitration for Sport!
Quote:
The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
You think the court just brought up threshold substances out of the blue, you complete moron???? They were explaining it to the athlete just like I have explained it to your dumb ass.

BECAUSE YOU DID THINK EPO WAS A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE, DIDN'T YOU. THAT SHOWS YOUR CONFUSION. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THE LIST OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES WAS A PARTIAL LIST BECAUSE EPO WASN'T ON IT??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list.

WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT, HUH ADP???? LMAOOOOO



On top of that, why are you saying there is a threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance?????

Here is your statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

exceeds = goes above, right? Good.

Here is the court's statement.
Quote:
there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
non-human production of the substance = synthetic EPO, right?

So what we have is:

Your statement:
Quote:
There is a threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

The Court's Statement:
Quote:
There is no threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED to lose!!!



.

What it appears is that you are trying to deflect by suddenly not mentioning WADA and going back to the BAP which you admit was not in the WADA TD2014EPO document.


So um....does your deflection work for WADA. Keep in mind....it didn't become business as usual til 2004. Didn't even get a threshold substances document until 2010 is it...? But no matter. The court told you what was up once WADA got to town.


Give up, son. It's over.


You're never going to recover from that 4-0 Asswhoopin, especially after what just happened now!!!!!

Poor poor ADP02. He thought he could get one over, but fell flat on his face, yet again!

Look at the above posts of yours.

Now remember what I said? I was not arguing over which document.

I was responding to your statements based on the case and what you interpreted from the panel based on the BAP testing for EPO.

THAT IS THE CHALLENGE!!!

You said that you are right. I DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!


You were so confident that you were right up until I challenged you. Now you have lost all confidence!!!

Told you ...
TRAVESTYNY IS WRONG!!!!

[travestyny]

What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!



You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED to lose!!!



.




Look at the above posts of yours.

Now remember what I said? I was not arguing over which document.

I was responding to your statements based on the case and what you interpreted from the panel based on the BAP testing for EPO.

THAT IS THE CHALLENGE!!!

You said that you are right. I DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!


You were so confident that you were right up until I challenged you. Now you have lost all confidence!!!

Told you ...
TRAVESTYNY IS WRONG!!!!

You really thought I was going to fall for your deflection, didn't you?


Did that make you mad? LMAOOOO.


Now tell me. Is this about WADA?

[ADP02]

What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!

Why you scared then, ADP. I’m giving you a chance to not go down as a 4-0 loser.

You’ll go down as a 8-0 loser instead

Still running scared? Yea, that’s what I thought. Now shut up and keep ducking the challenge. You know you’ll get bodied in 1 page. Go cry about your loss to someone who cares.


EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?

Court of Arbitration for Sport!
Quote:
The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
You think the court just brought up threshold substances out of the blue, you complete moron???? They were explaining it to the athlete just like I have explained it to your dumb ass.

BECAUSE YOU DID THINK EPO WAS A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE, DIDN'T YOU. THAT SHOWS YOUR CONFUSION. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THE LIST OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES WAS A PARTIAL LIST BECAUSE EPO WASN'T ON IT??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list.

WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT, HUH ADP???? LMAOOOOO



On top of that, why are you saying there is a threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance?????

Here is your statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

exceeds = goes above, right? Good.

Here is the court's statement.
Quote:
there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
non-human production of the substance = synthetic EPO, right?

So what we have is:

Your statement:
Quote:
There is a threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

The Court's Statement:
Quote:
There is no threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED to lose!!!



.

What it appears is that you are trying to deflect by suddenly not mentioning WADA and going back to the BAP which you admit was not in the WADA TD2014EPO document.


So um....does your deflection work for WADA. Keep in mind....it didn't become business as usual til 2004. Didn't even get a threshold substances document until 2010 is it...? But no matter. The court told you what was up once WADA got to town.


Give up, son. It's over.


You're never going to recover from that 4-0 Asswhoopin, especially after what just happened now!!!!!

Poor poor ADP02. He thought he could get one over, but fell flat on his face, yet again!

Look at the above posts of yours.

Now remember what I said? I was not arguing over which document.

I was responding to your statements based on the case and what you interpreted from the panel based on the BAP testing for EPO.

THAT IS THE CHALLENGE!!!

You said that you are right. I DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!


You were so confident that you were right up until I challenged you. Now you have lost all confidence!!!

Told you ...
TRAVESTYNY IS WRONG!!!!

You really thought I was going to fall for your deflection, didn't you?


Did that make you mad? LMAOOOO.


Now tell me. Is this about WADA?

I am making it so clear for you and you are admitting that you are PIUSSING OUT!!!!


I responded a long time ago to your current DEFLECTIONs.


This is about the case that YOU kept on bringing up for a month to prove you understood what the panel is saying and to state that BAP test is not a threshold test.

I disagree with you.


You know what this is about. I cannot make it any more clearer.

If you are still confused I can make it more clear!

But as I said, it's because you never had any confidence in what you said. You are just admitting to it now. No pressure! LOL

[travestyny]

What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!



You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED to lose!!!



.




Look at the above posts of yours.

Now remember what I said? I was not arguing over which document.

I was responding to your statements based on the case and what you interpreted from the panel based on the BAP testing for EPO.

THAT IS THE CHALLENGE!!!

You said that you are right. I DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!


You were so confident that you were right up until I challenged you. Now you have lost all confidence!!!

Told you ...
TRAVESTYNY IS WRONG!!!!

I am making it so clear for you and you are admitting that you are PIUSSING OUT!!!!


I responded a long time ago to your current DEFLECTIONs.


This is about the case that YOU kept on bringing up for a month to prove you understood what the panel is saying and to state that BAP test is not a threshold test.

I disagree with you.


You know what this is about. I cannot make it any more clearer.

If you are still confused I can make it more clear!

But as I said, it's because you never had any confidence in what you said. You are just admitting to it now. No pressure! LOL

Dude, I only asked you one question and that made you deflect? Really?


Is this about WADA?


Hmmmm. I think that's the third time I asked you. You don't seem to want to answer.


Don't make me make another list that goes 13 lines long with you refusing to answer, son.

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]