Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Zaroku]

That's the truth.

But ADP02 STILL hasn't paid up on the bet and given travestyny his points. Can you believe that?

He didn’t pay because he is a Bish azz hoe mother ****er,...

[ShoulderRoll]

He didn’t pay because he is a Bish azz hoe mother ****er,...

Yeah. He agreed to abide by the judges' decision so he should pay up.

Have some honor.

[Zaroku]

Yeah. He agreed to abide by the judges' decision so he should pay up.

Have some honor.

Exactly... end of story..

I think I offered to pay up, but the winner refused to let me pay..

Shameless..

My buddies know, if I owe anything I will hunt them down to pay...

[ADP02]

He didn’t pay because he is a Bish azz hoe mother ****er,...

Yeah. He agreed to abide by the judges' decision so he should pay up.

Have some honor.

Exactly... end of story..

I think I offered to pay up, but the winner refused to let me pay..

Shameless..

My buddies know, if I owe anything I will hunt them down to pay...

You guys did not realize what Travestyny did.


When requested by a judge to provide a summarized statement to judge on (judge didn't want to read all of the thread), Travestyny provided a case and statements that were based on ICU rules not WADA rules. Secondly, he didn't even understand what the CAS panel was trying to state. That is, irrelevant information.

Most importantly, why did he confuse and show the judges irrelevant information?


There was lots of that.

Question: Why do you guys care more about points than what was going on in that thread?

Just what I stated here is grounds for DQ … but it's OK, I want Travestyny to hold on tight to that imaginary score!!!


.

[travestyny]

You guys did not realize what Travestyny did.


When requested by a judge to provide a summarized statement to judge on (judge didn't want to read all of the thread), Travestyny provided a case and statements that were based on ICU rules not WADA rules. Secondly, he didn't even understand what the CAS panel was trying to state. That is, irrelevant information.

Most importantly, why did he confuse and show the judges irrelevant information?


There was lots of that.

Question: Why do you guys care more about points than what was going on in that thread?

Just what I stated here is grounds for DQ … but it's OK, I want Travestyny to hold on tight to that imaginary score!!!


.

SO THE CASE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT WADA CRITERIA???????


THERE YOU GO AGAIN LYING, YOU SACK OF SHlT. EVEN WILLY WANKER STATED THAT HE CLEARLY READ ABOUT WADA IN THE DOCUMENT OVER AND OVER.

YOU'RE DONE YOU HOE ASS BlTCH. I'M GOING TO KEEP DISRESPECTING YOUR DUMB ASS. JUST LIKE YOU TRIED TO DEFLECT SAYING THAT IT WASN'T ABOUT THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES...BUT YOU GOT EXPOSED AGAIN!

In the case of Floyd, we aren't talking about threshold substances as far as I know.

You said thresholds are not a factor for Floyd but that is not an accurate statement.
EPO, testosterone (T/E) ratios are a few naturally produced substances in humans in which Floyd could have been trying to hide. We know of low T/E ratios, rumors of positive results and the IV scandal.

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
Its NOT being biased. that is a big deal.
.

You DEFLECTED my point!

I answered yours but it went right over your head!

I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list. Anyways, Floyd micro-doses then time is of essence if you want to catch the substance above the threshold. Then add to it that Floyd drank like a fish and had not 1 but 2 IVs .... other cheats wished they were allowed to do what Floyd was allowed on May 1st, 2015

BUT BUT BUT....IT WASN'T ABOUT THESHOLD SUBSTANCES.


NOW YOU ARE ALSO TRYING TO SAY IT WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER VS. PACQUIAO. ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING?


I OWN YOU, YOU LYING PIECE OF SHlT. NEXT I'M GOING TO LOOK AND SEE IF I STILL GOT YOUR EMAIL ASKING ME FOR A DRAW.

YOU BEEN DEFLECTING THIS ENTIRE TIME!!!!!

[Vadrigar.]

Watch and weep.

Floyd objectively lost.

[ShoulderRoll]

You guys did not realize what Travestyny did.


When requested by a judge to provide a summarized statement to judge on (judge didn't want to read all of the thread), Travestyny provided a case and statements that were based on ICU rules not WADA rules. Secondly, he didn't even understand what the CAS panel was trying to state. That is, irrelevant information.

Most importantly, why did he confuse and show the judges irrelevant information?


There was lots of that.

Question: Why do you guys care more about points than what was going on in that thread?

Just what I stated here is grounds for DQ … but it's OK, I want Travestyny to hold on tight to that imaginary score!!!


.

The judges all made their decision. Obviously they didn't feel you presented and supported your arguments well enough.

You just have to live with it and should pay the man his points.

[ADP02]

SO THE CASE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT WADA CRITERIA???????


THERE YOU GO AGAIN LYING, YOU SACK OF SHlT. EVEN WILLY WANKER STATED THAT HE CLEARLY READ ABOUT WADA IN THE DOCUMENT OVER AND OVER.

YOU'RE DONE YOU HOE ASS BlTCH. I'M GOING TO KEEP DISRESPECTING YOUR DUMB ASS. JUST LIKE YOU TRIED TO DEFLECT SAYING THAT IT WASN'T ABOUT THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES...BUT YOU GOT EXPOSED AGAIN!










BUT BUT BUT....IT WASN'T ABOUT THESHOLD SUBSTANCES.


NOW YOU ARE ALSO TRYING TO SAY IT WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER VS. PACQUIAO. ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING?


I OWN YOU, YOU LYING PIECE OF SHlT. NEXT I'M GOING TO LOOK AND SEE IF I STILL GOT YOUR EMAIL ASKING ME FOR A DRAW.

YOU BEEN DEFLECTING THIS ENTIRE TIME!!!!!

DEFLECTOR


Why don't you tell everyone what you told me during the last few months?

You said that: Those same statements that you keep posting is irrelevant to our discussion from 2017.

You said that over and over again so you must have meant, it right? Are you lying then in 2017 or now or BOTH!!!

The case was following UCI rules NOT WADA rules.

The statements was about BAP testing. What did you say about that. Relevant or not?

You confused the judges and in fact, did not even state the truth in that they were applying UCI rules!!!!

Lastly, was what was mentioned was it about 2014 WADA? NO, it was 2003-2004 time period! So even today, you cannot state the truth.

YOU SIR are a LIAR and CHEATER!

Simple as that!!!!!








.

[Zaroku]

You guys did not realize what Travestyny did.


When requested by a judge to provide a summarized statement to judge on (judge didn't want to read all of the thread), Travestyny provided a case and statements that were based on ICU rules not WADA rules. Secondly, he didn't even understand what the CAS panel was trying to state. That is, irrelevant information.

Most importantly, why did he confuse and show the judges irrelevant information?


There was lots of that.

Question: Why do you guys care more about points than what was going on in that thread?

Just what I stated here is grounds for DQ … but it's OK, I want Travestyny to hold on tight to that imaginary score!!!


.

I’m gonna give him all my points,.l.,

[ADP02]

The judges all made their decision. Obviously they didn't feel you presented and supported your arguments well enough.

You just have to live with it and should pay the man his points.

WRONG answer.

The question was, do you care what the topic was about and if any of the judges were duped?

Yes or no?