Originally posted by Scott9945
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Hagler and Leonard had fought in 82?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Barn View Posterrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Here is what Duran said in the post-fight interview.
Duran: "He came to tear my head off, but when he saw that I could hit him hard, with strength, he got scared and became a coward. That's why he didn't take too many chances and mix it up with me. Everyone was saying he was a destroyer, but when he hit me, he didn't do anything to me. His punches absolutely did me no damage. He got scared every time he threw a jab because I could get my right in under it. That's why he held off so much."
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Old LefHook View PostNo, not hurt feelings. Sonny is a shock jock. That is the only way he can get the attention of anyone at all. Ridiculous contentions are the proper tools of a shock jock's trade. Without the riduculous contention, there is no attention forthcoming.
Lennox Lewis was a scrub and now Hagler is. Next, who knows? Whatever shocks people and makes them react. I have these guys like Juggy and Sonny pegged, and barely bother with them anymore. Their posts are worthless for information and insight, but delightful for unintended humor and the idiocy they illuminate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing56 View PostWho do you think would have won if the two had faced in 82? I pick Leonard. Would have been great though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostNot the Leonard vs Hagler in 1987... Leonard "blitzed" Hagler with punches and won the fight by a landslide... i cannot recall any fight being scored by your methodoligy.
judges: 110-118, 115-113, 113-115
Those are the official scores. No rational person would call that a landslide. No experienced fan would call that fight a landslide. I have no problem with Leonard winning a squeaker, but your agenda driven description has no credibility.
And harder punches count more than softer ones. I thought everyone knew that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostA landslide? Really?
judges: 110-118, 115-113, 113-115
Those are the official scores. No rational person would call that a landslide. No experienced fan would call that fight a landslide. I have no problem with Leonard winning a squeaker, but your agenda driven description has no credibility.
And harder punches count more than softer ones. I thought everyone knew that.
You talk nothing but garbage.
Try telling the judges of Willie Pep fights that harder punches count more than softer ones..or fighters like Pernell Whitaker, Meldrick Taylor, Chris Byrd, Nicolino Locche and a long list of IBHOF fighters LOL..
Everything you come out with is a joke!
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostOnce again, you are talking a heap of bullshyt. Boxing is scored on "correct punches landed on target".. nothing whatsoever to do with how hard the fighter throws the punch. There is no "Richter Scale" in the ring for the judges to check to see how hard the punch is, each time a fighter lands a shot...
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HaymonBoxing View PostWTF happened to this place.
Oh thats right. Sonnyboy came back and Juggernaut came around. Shame cause we actually used to have a good discussion in here.
You have never discussed boxing in your life other than with your baby brother.
Comment
Comment