Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How Much Do You Respect Holyfield
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Humean View PostOk but even if you are right about Holyfield beating Lewis does that mean Holyfield was the best heavyweight of the 90s? As you said styles make fights and if you look at the rest of their records in the 90s does that make Holyfield better? Lewis lost only one fight in the 90s but Holyfield four. I think you can argue it either way but I think I just favour Lewis as the best of the 90s.
Buster
Foreman
Bowe
Moorer
Tyson
Lewis
There wasn't on champ he didn't face and throw in guys like Holmes and mercer, Holyfield has to be #1
Comment
-
Holyfield is great..the problem is he didn't have star power....for example,he
beat Tyson fair and square but Tyson is and always will be the star...sad but
true...Lennox same thing...you either have star power or you don't...Fighters
who had star power are Tyson,Delahoya,Leonard,Duran,Ali..for example.
Comment
-
Originally posted by toooooool View PostHolyfield is great..the problem is he didn't have star power....for example,he
beat Tyson fair and square but Tyson is and always will be the star...sad but
true...Lennox same thing...you either have star power or you don't...Fighters
who had star power are Tyson,Delahoya,Leonard,Duran,Ali..for example.
Comment
-
Originally posted by toooooool View PostHolyfield is great..the problem is he didn't have star power....for example,he
beat Tyson fair and square but Tyson is and always will be the star...sad but
true...Lennox same thing...you either have star power or you don't...Fighters
who had star power are Tyson,Delahoya,Leonard,Duran,Ali..for example.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostHoly was great....Not better than Lewis and Lewis beat him twice. I don't care about versions....Lewis was ****** for not knocking Holyfield out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Layzie Kidd View PostNow, theres no question in my mind Holyfield was the number one heavyweight of the 90s and has a good resume. However the trend now is to rag on him for butting and it seems thats getting tossed around more than ever now.
Thats not to say the other fighters have not resulted to dirty tactics themselves, how many times has Tyson hit after the bell or when an oppenent was practically down? Tons (before anyone brings him up).
However some of the really obvious butts (Michael Dokes for example, upon the knockout when he chased him) and the fact it gets mentioned a lot of times especially in his later fights makes me wish they hadnt happened so he looks better.
Do you think theyre always intentional? Am I seeing things? Or is it on average with the dirty tactics you've seen others pull off at the time? I respect him as the premier 90s heavy and working his way up, but some things makes me wince.
Holyfield was highly skilled and was always in terrific shape. He was also a real warrior. He was the real deal. His record speaks for itself. He fought everybody. He cleaned out a mediocre CW division and moved up to become one of the best HW of his generation.
Comment
-
Comment