Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My top 25 ATG list

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
    I don't put Heavyweights on p4p lists either. My rational is that the lighter weight classes produce the better fighters. Heavyweights also get too damn much attention as it is.

    Poet
    With the heavyweights getting so big in the last 20 years, it may be time to make a heavyweight P4P list, making them all the identical size for rating purposes.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
      With the heavyweights getting so big in the last 20 years, it may be time to make a heavyweight P4P list, making them all the identical size for rating purposes.
      That might be an idea.....although I think there's a point where size becomes a DISadvantage.

      Poet

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
        With the heavyweights getting so big in the last 20 years, it may be time to make a heavyweight P4P list, making them all the identical size for rating purposes.
        I wouldn't do that for a number of reasons. There has always been big heavyweights and any of the half decent ones have been beat by smaller guys anyway, and I wouldn't necessarily call some heavyweights bigger, just fat, which is a disadvantage. One very important feature of the heavyweight division is that it is limitless, size difference is a factor all heavyweights know of and come to terms with.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP