<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The relative merits of specializing in a few skills and understanding how to use a variety of technical skills in boxing.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The relative merits of specializing in a few skills and understanding how to use a variety of technical skills in boxing.

    So I notice a criticism that is as old as the hills in boxing. Many trainers have felt amateur training is limited. The criticisms are varied, there is criticism about not using the power hand enough, the limits of footwork, or even the limited amount of technical skills.

    Fighters often develop specialized techniques. But even when developed, without a full range, compliment of techniques It is easy to avoid a specialized technique.

    Take a fighter like Lennox Lewis and you will see a guy who really threw a variety of punches. He could get you with the uppercut, the right or even the jab.

    But even Lewis pales by comparison to Tunney. Gene just happened to come along right at the time when boxing was changing. He mastered the old ways with fighters like Corbett and fought Dempsey, really started the perfection of punching techniques to many people.

    Try as I may it's hard to think about a fighter who got by on a few techniques can anybody think of any? I mean a relatively famous fighter, maybe not ATG but close to... Thoughts?

    #2
    First name that comes to mind is Wilder, save for when he first beat Stiverne and decided to stick and move for the night, he was basically:

    -Have a deadly right hand
    -Be taller and longer than my opponent
    -Combine that length and deadly right hand
    -Rinse and repeat

    Don't get me wrong, I loved Wilder, but I enjoy the principle of someone being really good at a single aspect and then pushing the limits to see how far they can get. Heck I like it in team sports as well: ie a basketball team that isn't tremendously big, or sound on offense, but just presses their way to victory.
    billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by DeeMoney View Post
      First name that comes to mind is Wilder, save for when he first beat Stiverne and decided to stick and move for the night, he was basically:

      -Have a deadly right hand
      -Be taller and longer than my opponent
      -Combine that length and deadly right hand
      -Rinse and repeat

      Don't get me wrong, I loved Wilder, but I enjoy the principle of someone being really good at a single aspect and then pushing the limits to see how far they can get. Heck I like it in team sports as well: ie a basketball team that isn't tremendously big, or sound on offense, but just presses their way to victory.
      It is a legit strategy... In all sports.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

        It is a legit strategy... In all sports.
        Its one of the reason I tend to like collegiate sports more than professional.

        By the time you get to the top leagues (NFL, NBA, etc) the talent is so relatively ****genized that techniques and styles become the same. You start approaching a Nash Equilibrium of sort.

        In some ways, I feel like boxing trends that way, thats why I like it when you get fighters who are one dimensional, or succeed despite having glaring holes.
        billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP