Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Did Usyk Weigh In At His Heaviest When He Fought Fury?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    Why Did Usyk Weigh In At His Heaviest When He Fought Fury?

    Usyk scaled his heaviest weights to date in his 2 fights with Fury,why is that?
    Tags: None
    #2
    Originally posted by Bronson66 View Post
    Usyk scaled his heaviest weights to date in his 2 fights with Fury,why is that?
    After being manhandled and exposed by bum chisora, he started taking even more steroids.

    Comment

      #3
      Because Fury grabs.



      Now we'll get revisionist history where Tyson has slowed down and used to be perfect. People will conveniently forget his boxing got him floored by Wilder and that's why he brought in dirty boxing, and they will claim he dances less now because he got old not because he's being safer than ever.

      At no point in time did Tyson Fury have the talent to beat Usyk. He hardly had the talent to beat Wilder for Christs' sake. He got exposed on talent and went for size advantage. Usyk took that away from him, and did it as the smaller man.

      So yeah, I'm fully prepare to read about Fury slowed down like as if that's a bad thing and that BS he does didn't get him looking at lights against a low skill opponent.




      Why was Haye heavier for Ruiz than Valuev? The quiet man was a huggy bastard. Valuev = slow.
      • Likes 2

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
        Because Fury grabs.



        Now we'll get revisionist history where Tyson has slowed down and used to be perfect. People will conveniently forget his boxing got him floored by Wilder and that's why he brought in dirty boxing, and they will claim he dances less now because he got old not because he's being safer than ever.

        At no point in time did Tyson Fury have the talent to beat Usyk. He hardly had the talent to beat Wilder for Christs' sake. He got exposed on talent and went for size advantage. Usyk took that away from him, and did it as the smaller man.

        So yeah, I'm fully prepare to read about Fury slowed down like as if that's a bad thing and that BS he does didn't get him looking at lights against a low skill opponent.




        Why was Haye heavier for Ruiz than Valuev? The quiet man was a huggy bastard. Valuev = slow.
        Why didn’t Haye just weight in at 198 for all his Heavyweight fights like he did vs Marcrinelli?
        Bronson66 Bronson66 likes this.
        • Likes 1

        Comment

          #5
          Brains made him do it.

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

            Why didn’t Haye just weight in at 198 for all his Heavyweight fights like he did vs Marcrinelli?
            None of those propagating size is only a minor advantage will satisfactorily answer this.

            • Likes 2

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
              Because Fury grabs.



              Now we'll get revisionist history where Tyson has slowed down and used to be perfect. People will conveniently forget his boxing got him floored by Wilder and that's why he brought in dirty boxing, and they will claim he dances less now because he got old not because he's being safer than ever.

              At no point in time did Tyson Fury have the talent to beat Usyk. He hardly had the talent to beat Wilder for Christs' sake. He got exposed on talent and went for size advantage. Usyk took that away from him, and did it as the smaller man.

              So yeah, I'm fully prepare to read about Fury slowed down like as if that's a bad thing and that BS he does didn't get him looking at lights against a low skill opponent.




              Why was Haye heavier for Ruiz than Valuev? The quiet man was a huggy bastard. Valuev = slow.
              "went for size advantage" I like this!

              Comment

                #8
                The thread's question is rhetorical, I know, for as weight goes, that question is settled. It means that weight does matter except when it doesn't, but it does most of the time. I am not talking 5-10 lbs. A significant advantage among heavyweights might start around 25 lbs. It is such a sure thing I am willing to bet anyone $100 without looking that the heavyweight with the significant weight edge wins more often than the smaller man in heavyweight matches since 1900.
                Bronson66 Bronson66 likes this.
                • Likes 1

                Comment

                  #9
                  I keep my bet above, even though in shape champions often fight slobs.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mr Mitts View Post
                    The thread's question is rhetorical, I know, for as weight goes, that question is settled. It means that weight does matter except when it doesn't, but it does most of the time. I am not talking 5-10 lbs. A significant advantage among heavyweights might start around 25 lbs. It is such a sure thing I am willing to bet anyone $100 without looking that the heavyweight with the significant weight edge wins more often than the smaller man in heavyweight matches since 1900.
                    Then you must be ,"a size queen casual."

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP