Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pick a fighter you considered the GOAT, or pick a fighter who is top 5 ATG for you. What is it about him that makes him So? What quality(s)?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pick a fighter you considered the GOAT, or pick a fighter who is top 5 ATG for you. What is it about him that makes him So? What quality(s)?

    So assuming Ray Robinson is the best... Is it all the things he could do in the ring? Is it his lack of weakness? is there one quality that stands out?


    #2
    With Robinson most everything was proven rather than conjectured. There is no shortage of example, little is left to speculation, other than the absence of Charley Burley on his sheet, who was the best of Murderers' Row. Of course Burley was a fighter who could not draw flies to a carcass, which has to be at least part of the reason, I figure. Robinson liked money; he fought for big money, not a pair of chickens and a cow. It is a tossup. Burley beat Archie Moore several times, proving it was no fluke, and I doubt Robinson ever could have whipped Moore. I read long ago that Moore, Ray and their wives had dinner once and discussed a matchup.

    What was proven about Robinson?

    1 He had a monster chin
    2 He had a monster punch with either hand
    3 He threw every punch in the book (maybe not bolo)
    4 He was great in rematches
    5 Excellent stamina
    6 He fought often
    7 Adept against all styles
    8 His was a balanced attack with both hands and plenty of body punches
    9 His killer instinct is legendary
    10 Consistently a brilliant combination puncher
    11 His grade in speed is A- (A minus)
    12 He could KO with body shots using either hand
    13 He would fight any white man
    14 His grade in ring generalship is B-
    15 His grade in defense is B
    16 Grade in offense is A+, and then some
    17 An all time KO leader


    Did I overlooked something?

    ** * * *

    And to think we never saw him at his best, probably about three years before he left welterweight land.

    Ivich Ivich billeau2 billeau2 like this.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
      With Robinson most everything was proven rather than conjectured. There is no shortage of example, little is left to speculation, other than the absence of Charley Burley on his sheet, who was the best of Murderers' Row. Of course Burley was a fighter who could not draw flies to a carcass, which has to be at least part of the reason, I figure. Robinson liked money; he fought for big money, not a pair of chickens and a cow. It is a tossup. Burley beat Archie Moore several times, proving it was no fluke, and I doubt Robinson ever could have whipped Moore. I read long ago that Moore, Ray and their wives had dinner once and discussed a matchup.

      What was proven about Robinson?

      1 He had a monster chin
      2 He had a monster punch with either hand
      3 He threw every punch in the book (maybe not bolo)
      4 He was great in rematches
      5 Excellent stamina
      6 He fought often
      7 Adept against all styles
      8 His was a balanced attack with both hands and plenty of body punches
      9 His killer instinct is legendary
      10 Consistently a brilliant combination puncher
      11 His grade in speed is A- (A minus)
      12 He could KO with body shots using either hand
      13 He would fight any white man
      14 His grade in ring generalship is B-
      15 His grade in defense is B
      16 Grade in offense is A+, and then some
      17 An all time KO leader


      Did I overlooked something?

      ** * * *

      And to think we never saw him at his best, probably about three years before he left welterweight land.
      There is no getting around the sheer volume of what Robinson could do... But you have guys like Armstrong who do not do everything but do something extremely well... So surely there is more to the driving force that makes any fighter potentially the greatest. I used Robinson as an example.

      Comment


        #4
        In the years that Burley and Robinson could have met at WW, circa 1940-1943 Robinson never seemed to venture any further west than Chicago and St. Louis, fighting mostly in the New York area.

        Burley spent most of his best years in Caifornia, coming east to fight Zivic in Pittsburg as a hone coming, but otherwise the two (Burley-SRR) just weren't campaiging in the same region of the country.

        Certainly SRR was the draw so it would have been up to Burley to come east and seek him out. Burley just didn't seem interested in fighting in NY. Fought there once very early in his career (St. Nick's Arena) and then at the end in Buffalo (Holman Williams).

        I would argue the failure for the fight to happen lies with Burley's multiple managers.

        But then again Burley was always able to maintain a Ring Ranking without fighting SRR so maybe that was the plan.

        IMO the onus is on Burley. Considering the dynamics of that period he needed to seek out SRR. Can't see why top ranked Robinson would want to travel that far west for a difficult fight with a guy who can't draw flies to a carcass.

        Comment


          #5
          Ideally, Burley vs Robinson would be contested at the modern Junior middleweight limit.

          The referee once stopped a fight between Burley and Holman Williams for lack of action and sent them both to the showers in disgrace. With performances like that you must be right--Burley was not looking for Robinson very hard.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

            There is no getting around the sheer volume of what Robinson could do... But you have guys like Armstrong who do not do everything but do something extremely well... So surely there is more to the driving force that makes any fighter potentially the greatest. I used Robinson as an example.
            Armstrong is an ATG but he missed a few.
            Burley
            Williams
            Cocoa Kid
            Being three of them.
            Last edited by Ivich; 08-31-2022, 04:37 AM.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
              So assuming Ray Robinson is the best... Is it all the things he could do in the ring? Is it his lack of weakness? is there one quality that stands out?
              Since most everyone will go for SRR,I'll go for Harry Greb
              Resume
              Speed
              Chin
              Willingness to concede weight to top fighters
              Sheer volume of bouts

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Ivich View Post
                Since most everyone will go for SRR,I'll go for Harry Greb
                Resume
                Speed
                Chin
                Willingness to concede weight to top fighters
                Sheer volume of bouts
                I just want to clarify. Robinson was a convenient example... I think "the best' is a little bit difficult to determine... Just wanted to give an example for a typical opinion and what might "drive" a fighter considered to be the GOAT.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

                  I just want to clarify. Robinson was a convenient example... I think "the best' is a little bit difficult to determine... Just wanted to give an example for a typical opinion and what might "drive" a fighter considered to be the GOAT.
                  You couldnt pick a better example.
                  billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP