Class in session for Old School Skill Deniers ..like moneytheman!!!!!!!

[Willow The Wisp]

I hear allot about Mike Tyson this, Mike Tyson that. Now I am all about Mike Tyson! I see him as a throwback type fighter and Cus certainly saw to that (not just another deluded Ali clone popular at the time Tyson crashed onto the scene), so I question why you hold him up as the "most Modern heavyweight skill level" (and really, aren't Deontal Wilder, Anthony Joshua and Andy Ruiz Jr even more evolved ?).
But here is something for YOU and anyone who thinks that Boxing is similar to field sports in terms of quality of play evolution:

As we all know, Mike Tyson was soundly beaten by
Evender Holyfield in 1996 > who Was beaten by
Michael Moorer in 1994 > who Was beaten by
George Foreman in 1994 > who Was beaten by
Muhammad Ali in 1974 > who Was beaten by
Ken Norton in 1973 > who Was beaten by
Jose Luis Garcia in 1970 > who Was beaten by
Vicente Rondon in 1969 > who Was beaten by
Bob Foster in 1972 > who Was beaten by
Zora Folley in 1965 > who Was beaten by
Johnny Summerlin in 1955 > who Was beaten by
Wes Bascom in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Jimmy Bivens in 1952 > who Was beaten by
Joe Louis in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Max Schmeling in 1936 > who Was beaten by
Jack Sharkey in 1932 > who Was beaten by
Jack Dempsey in 1927 > who Was beaten by
Jim Flynn in 1918 > who Was beaten by
Jack Johnson in 1907 > who Was beaten by
Joe Choynski in 1901 > who Was beaten by
Gentlemam Jim Corbett !!!!! .....In 1889!!

....So riddle me this: If fighers keep getting better every decade, how are these wins working backwards even possible dating back 133 years?
How???? If fighers just do noting but get better over time, how can you back up like this??

I'll tell you how. Its because facts don't care about your feelings.

Class dismissed - See you Next time.

-Professor Will O'.

[ShoulderRoll]

moneytheman isn't going to like this thread.

[Willie Pep 229]

Moneytheman is a bot. That's why the same words repeat so often.

[QueensburyRules]

- -



that dumb quote was exposed years ago you idiot follower rah and mccall didnt just hit lennox one time you idiot and mccall and rah used way more advanced movement then son ever did left that out didn't you see how using dumb follower quotes you read expose you idiot

Left out in the rematch when lennox was ready he picked off rah and rah was koed lennox was a master when he was ready at picking shots

Left out son was hurt by leotis and had trouble with him

left out son was dropped by ali and they say it was fake dont know if it was fake or real either way he stayed down cause he knew ali was to much skilled for him

Even before the drop by ali ali was landing at will cause of son basic movement like I said and how slow son was

So maybe you should watch rah and mccall agiaj you idiot anybody with good vision can see they were like i said way more advanced then son ever was

So no the real son on video which was like i said he was would be destroyed fast since he was nothing like the dudes who you compared for some odd reason yet them being way more advanced as I said which made you look like a idiot and lennox wins every time fast you crazy idiot

Your fiction son wins fast though but its no vid of him so he doesn't matter

a comparison that makes sense is lennox fought a man named acey that was the modern son for lennox difference is he moved on his toes more

Acey was as slow but more sloopy then son defense was bad just the same threw wide punches similar to and lennox wasnt as strong as his older self but he still destroyed that man
he was missing shots bad and lennox picked him off easy

Imagine the hw ver of lennox facing acey when lennox hit way harder and was way better with his tech he would had destroyed ace way faster

Your a idiot son loses by being destroyed like I said see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes other idiot followers say you idiot watch matches

Don't see why son couldn't do the same as rah and mccall yet both being way more advanced then him.... you people are idiots just say any dumb quote you read and think it makes sense

[The Old LefHook]

I hear allot about Mike Tyson this, Mike Tyson that. Now I am all about Mike Tyson! I see him as a throwback type fighter and Cus certainly saw to that (not just another deluded Ali clone popular at the time Tyson crashed onto the scene), so I question why you hold him up as the "most Modern heavyweight skill level" (and really, aren't Deontal Wilder, Anthony Joshua and Andy Ruiz Jr even more evolved ?).
But here is something for YOU and anyone who thinks that Boxing is similar to field sports in terms of quality of play evolution:

As we all know, Mike Tyson was soundly beaten by
Evender Holyfield in 1996 > who Was beaten by
Michael Moorer in 1994 > who Was beaten by
George Foreman in 1994 > who Was beaten by
Muhammad Ali in 1974 > who Was beaten by
Ken Norton in 1973 > who Was beaten by
Jose Luis Garcia in 1970 > who Was beaten by
Vicente Rondon in 1969 > who Was beaten by
Bob Foster in 1972 > who Was beaten by
Zora Folley in 1965 > who Was beaten by
Johnny Summerlin in 1955 > who Was beaten by
Wes Bascom in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Jimmy Bivens in 1952 > who Was beaten by
Joe Louis in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Max Schmeling in 1936 > who Was beaten by
Jack Sharkey in 1932 > who Was beaten by
Jack Dempsey in 1927 > who Was beaten by
Jim Flynn in 1918 > who Was beaten by
Jack Johnson in 1907 > who Was beaten by
Joe Choynski in 1901 > who Was beaten by
Gentlemam Jim Corbett !!!!! .....In 1889!!

....So riddle me this: If fighers keep getting better every decade, how are these wins working backwards even possible dating back 133 years?
How???? If fighers just do noting but get better over time, how can you back up like this??

I'll tell you how. Its because facts don't care about your feelings.

Class dismissed - See you Next time.

-Professor Will O'.

Good job on the list!

[kara]

moneytheman isn't going to like this thread.

Grabs popcorn to wait for moneytheman to enter thread....

[P to the J]

I hear allot about Mike Tyson this, Mike Tyson that. Now I am all about Mike Tyson! I see him as a throwback type fighter and Cus certainly saw to that (not just another deluded Ali clone popular at the time Tyson crashed onto the scene), so I question why you hold him up as the "most Modern heavyweight skill level" (and really, aren't Deontal Wilder, Anthony Joshua and Andy Ruiz Jr even more evolved ?).
But here is something for YOU and anyone who thinks that Boxing is similar to field sports in terms of quality of play evolution:

As we all know, Mike Tyson was soundly beaten by
Evender Holyfield in 1996 > who Was beaten by
Michael Moorer in 1994 > who Was beaten by
George Foreman in 1994 > who Was beaten by
Muhammad Ali in 1974 > who Was beaten by
Ken Norton in 1973 > who Was beaten by
Jose Luis Garcia in 1970 > who Was beaten by
Vicente Rondon in 1969 > who Was beaten by
Bob Foster in 1972 > who Was beaten by
Zora Folley in 1965 > who Was beaten by
Johnny Summerlin in 1955 > who Was beaten by
Wes Bascom in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Jimmy Bivens in 1952 > who Was beaten by
Joe Louis in 1951 > who Was beaten by
Max Schmeling in 1936 > who Was beaten by
Jack Sharkey in 1932 > who Was beaten by
Jack Dempsey in 1927 > who Was beaten by
Jim Flynn in 1918 > who Was beaten by
Jack Johnson in 1907 > who Was beaten by
Joe Choynski in 1901 > who Was beaten by
Gentlemam Jim Corbett !!!!! .....In 1889!!

....So riddle me this: If fighers keep getting better every decade, how are these wins working backwards even possible dating back 133 years?
How???? If fighers just do noting but get better over time, how can you back up like this??

I'll tell you how. Its because facts don't care about your feelings.

Class dismissed - See you Next time.

-Professor Will O'.

Absolutely bizarre, bat****, rambling rant of a post, with neither a coherent thread of argument, subtlety, or rationality present anywhere…

….and that’s exactly why you’ll get this like and my undying respect. Keep it up!

[Willow The Wisp]

Absolutely bizarre, bat****, rambling rant of a post, with neither a coherent thread of argument, subtlety, or rationality present anywhere…

….and that’s exactly why you’ll get this like and my undying respect. Keep it up!

Lol I can appreciate that.

[The Old LefHook]

What has happened to JAB, one of our best posters?

[Willie Pep 229]

What has happened to JAB, one of our best posters?

Maybe training for another fight. Wish he would share more with us about his fights.