Bob Arum Reveals 50/50 Contract Sent By Mayweather for Pacquiao Fight

[travestyny]

You offered no evidence dipshyt. Just an incomplete quote from Arum, and the word of Iole and Mayweather. I told you many times before...SHOW ME THE CONTRACT!

As I told you several times now, that contract got kicked back and forth in late 2009. Each side adding something and wanting changes. Arum finally got frustrated when the blood testing issue was being pushed. This was not some clear cut 50/50 contract, there were other demands being added until negotiations finally broke down. Arum ultimately blamed Schaefer...the guy who said he never sent a 50/50 signed contract.

No need for insults. I see the evidence right there.


Kevin Iole says he saw the contract.

Mayweather says it existed.

Bob Arum basically said, "It's right here."


So what do you think. Do you think Bob was senile and was holding his balls instead of the contract? What was in the contract is right there for you to see:

A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather).

Looks like it said 50/50 to me. We know why it broke down. Pacquiao wanted 24 days to recover from giving 2 tbsps fo blood. That's not the point of the thread. The point is....why would Bob Arum lie about the existence of this contract?


You aren't going to even attempt to answer, are you?

[travestyny]

More cvnt behavior.

You quoted Arum and left out the rest of the text that followed. The part about Schaefer saying he doesn't recall ever sending a 50/50 signed contract. You also left out the part where the contract was not finalized because of additional demands placed upon Manny to submit to blood testing. That's pretty much it, case closed.

You're right. It's a "cvnt" move to accuse anyone who doesn't agree with you of being senile. Shame on you. First Jimmy Deforest, and now Bob Arum. Wow!


Bob Arum, Floyd Mayweathr, and Kevin Iole said they saw the contract. That's one representative from each side, and a neutral party. Agree or disagree?

[GhostofDempsey]

No need for insults. I see the evidence right there.


Kevin Iole says he saw the contract.

Mayweather says it existed.

Bob Arum basically said, "It's right here."


So what do you think. Do you think Bob was senile and was holding his balls instead of the contract? What was in the contract is right there for you to see:




Looks like it said 50/50 to me. We know why it broke down. Pacquiao wanted 24 days to recover from giving 2 tbsps fo blood. That's not the point of the thread. The point is....why would Bob Arum lie about the existence of this contract?


You aren't going to even attempt to answer, are you?

That quote is from December 11th...on December 12th, Mayweather officially reveals his request for Olympic style drug testing. See, moved the goal post!

On December 22nd Golden Boy issues statement that Manny does not agree to their drug testing protocols. On December 25th Manny announces plans to sue Mayweather for his steroids accusations.

Keep clinging to Iole and Floyd. Arum spoke well before the Olympic drug testing was tossed into the mix. That's what he was talking about with the contract. His frustration was the moving of the goal post by Schaefer and Floyd. You are wrong. Admit it for once.

[travestyny]

I guess the evidence overwhelmingly points to this contract existing. Bob said all terms were agreed to:

"We have a contract that they sent us and all the terms have been agreed to,"

So stop it with the kicked back and forth crap. The only issue, as we all know, was Manny wanting 30 days to recover from giving 2 tbsps of blood, then going down to 24 days when video surfaced of him giving blood for Hatton 24 days out. That's it. Everything else...agreed to.


Going for my workout because you know, I'm a busy man. Hopefully by the time I get back, you'll have given some kind of evidence to explain why representatives from both sides and a neutral party would lie about the existence of this contract. I have doubts that you'll come up with anything.


Good luck!

[travestyny]

That quote is from December 11th...on December 12th, Mayweather officially reveals his request for Olympic style drug testing. See, moved the goal post!

On December 22nd Golden Boy issues statement that Manny does not agree to their drug testing protocols. On December 25th Manny announces plans to sue Mayweather for his steroids accusations.

Keep clinging to Iole and Floyd. Arum spoke well before the Olympic drug testing was tossed into the mix. That's what he was talking about with the contract. His frustration was the moving of the goal post by Schaefer and Floyd. You are wrong. Admit it for once.

What does this have to do with this thread, Mr. Hijacker. We already know he was afraid of giving 2 tbsps of blood even 15 days before the fight.

50/50 and 14 days to recover from giving 2tbsps of blood wasn't good enough for Pacquiao. I guess that's why Freddie Roach agreed the the fight falling apart was their fault during the first go around.


He did eventually accept 40/60 and 0 day cutoff doe. A worse deal for sure, but I guess he wasn't ready in his prime.....????


Like I said, I'll check back later for why reps for both sides and a neutral would lie regarding the existence of this contract. I don't expect to find much except for you to keep hi******* it since you have nothing.


Good luck.

[GhostofDempsey]

What does this have to do with this thread, Mr. Hijacker. We already know he was afraid of giving 2 tbsps of blood even 15 days before the fight.

50/50 and 14 days to recover from giving 2tbsps of blood wasn't good enough for Pacquiao. I guess that's why Freddie Roach agreed the the fight falling apart was their fault during the first go around.


He did eventually accept 40/60 and 0 day cutoff doe. A worse deal for sure, but I guess he wasn't ready in his prime.....????


Like I said, I'll check back later for why reps for both sides and a neutral would lie regarding the existence of this contract. I don't expect to find much except for you to keep hi******* it since you have nothing.


Good luck.

Now you're changing the terms because you just got owned. You claimed Manny turned down a 50/50 offer, and that there were no other conditions to be met at the time of signing. I already showed you where they added new terms the day after your 11 December quote. I just proved you wrong. Now you want to talk about talk about 2 tablespoons of blood? The fight was not made because of ongoing negotiations. There was at no time a straight offer of 50/50 signed by Mayweather by or before December 11th like you claim. Not when Floyd's team demanded Olympic testing the very next day!

Hijacker? My points are right on topic, how is it hi*******? We're talking the contract. Heat is getting to you now. Try not to hurt yourself ****ing on that keyboard.

[QueensburyRules]

GhostofDempsey hijacked a thread to talk about this, so it's not fair to continue with his shenanigans there. I welcome him here so he can discuss Bob Arum's quotation:

Apparently, he believes Arum is lying and that there was a secret scheme between Mayweather, Kevin Iole (who also saw the contract), and Bob Arum to lie about the existence of this contract to undermine Pacquiao. I'd love to hear his reasoning for this. Have at it!

- -U feeling all Hurricane Brown Stain Storm with every topic...

[travestyny]

Now you're changing the terms because you just got owned. You claimed Manny turned down a 50/50 offer, and that there were no other conditions to be met at the time of signing. I already showed you where they added new terms the day after your 11 December quote. I just proved you wrong. Now you want to talk about talk about 2 tablespoons of blood? The fight was not made because of ongoing negotiations. There was at no time a straight offer of 50/50 signed by Mayweather by or before December 11th like you claim. Not when Floyd's team demanded Olympic testing the very next day!

Hijacker? My points are right on topic, how is it hi*******? We're talking the contract. Heat is getting to you now. Try not to hurt yourself ****ing on that keyboard.

Uh, how have I changed any terms? He did turn down a 50/50 offer. Try to follow. The offer was 50/50 and what turned out to be a 14 day cut off. That' what he turned down. It clearly says in the article that they didn't sign because of drug testing.


He eventually accepted 40/60 and a 0 day cut off.

They weren't adding new terms to the main contract. It was agreed upon, just like Arum stated. I know you can read. The drug testing protocol is a separate contract. You can even find the contract for testing for the fight that happened somewhere online.


Good try. So you now agree that Pacquiao declined 50/50 and a 14 day cutoff for giving 2tbsps of blood? Finally we agree on something.


We can close this thread now. Thank you.

[travestyny]

- -U feeling all Hurricane Brown Stain Storm with every topic...

Tell your caretakers to come get you, you drunken monkey.

[GhostofDempsey]

Uh, how have I changed any terms? He did turn down a 50/50 offer. Try to follow. The offer was 50/50 and what turned out to be a 14 day cut off. That' what he turned down. It clearly says in the article that they didn't sign because of drug testing.


He eventually accepted 40/60 and a 0 day cut off.

They weren't adding new terms to the main contract. It was agreed upon, just like Arum stated. I know you can read. The drug testing protocol is a separate contract. You can even find the contract for testing for the fight that happened somewhere online.


Good try. So you now agree that Pacquiao declined 50/50 and a 14 day cutoff for giving 2tbsps of blood? Finally we agree on something.


We can close this thread now. Thank you.

You claimed he turned down a 50/50 offer that Floyd signed, you quoted Arum from 11 December and insist the contract was all good to go, and I'm saying Floyd never signed that offer because on 12 December, he insisted on Olympic drug testing. So did Floyd sign the 50/50 contract prior to December 11th? If not, your Arum quote means nothing, and Iole's claims are false.