Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[POLL] Who Has Faced The Softest Competition Overall?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by j0zef View Post
    Since this is obviously a pathetic attempt to troll GGG fans, who never denied the strength of Ward's resume, let's see if I can repay the favor.

    Best names on Ward's Resume are:
    Kessler (#1 SMW)
    Abraham (#8 SMW)
    Froch (#3 SMW)
    Dawson (#1 LHW).. drained 7 lbs, bleh.

    Golovkin has:
    Andy Lee
    Andre Dirrell
    Lucian Bute

    Macklin (#6 MW)
    Lemieux (#4 MW)
    Murray (#9 MW)
    Geale (#2 MW)


    And I'm sure you're gonna say that those rankings don't mean crap (even though they're all from Ring mag), but do keep in mind, for comparison purposes, that Abraham (#8 on Ward's resume) is currently being challenged by Murray (#9 on GGG's resume)
    :-)

    TROLL ON!
    Hilarious stuff.

    Comment


      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      These clowns will say anything. Good Lord.
      I agree. Poster will say anything since he's a clown.

      Comment


        Comment


          Originally posted by Raonic View Post
          I agree. Poster will say anything since he's a clown.
          Man STFU with your cornball ass. Ran in here like a phag to cape for your hero. Won't work today, alt!

          Comment


            Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
            So you're prepared to say that these guys have better resumes than Hopkins and RJJ? I don't understand what you're saying.

            I agree that their current standing isn't as good - which in fact is exactly my point about why recent history needs more emphasis and why I don't rate Ward with Kovalev and GGG P4P.


            It does in my opinion. I don't see why beating 93 year old Hopkins and Pascal puts him over GGG.
            Hopkins and RJJ have better overall resumes which is why they'll be going into the Hall of Fame before any of these guys. They also have recent one sided losses which is why they can't be ranked ahead of them P4P. Englsh mother***er.....do you speak it?

            Well because 93 year old Hopkins and Pascal are better fighters than anyone on GGG's resume. They would beat anyone on GGG's resume.

            93 year old Hopkins is the guy that Team GGG said they would maybe fight in the future....

            Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
            The names on Golovkins resume are more established veterans, Kovalev outside of Pascal(who kinda sucks) and 50 year old Hopkins contains more untested newbs.

            Geale, Murray and even Lemiuex and Rubio is more experienced than most on Kovalev's resume. Close, likely still have Kovalev slightly ahead.
            Outside of Kovalev's two best wins, then Golovkin has the better resume? LOL...ok then. Great logic. Outside of your **** and balls, you are a woman.

            Originally posted by j0zef View Post
            Forgot research isn't your strong suit.

            He started a troll thread, deserves the same in response
            How is it a "troll thread" to ask who has got the best resume between three undefeated fighters of around the same age, weight and ranking?

            Andre Ward won a Gold Medal at the Olympics, only Silver for GGG so if you're sad enough to go back to the amateurs.....you stay losing.

            Comment


              Look at them all rallying against the next non-black star!

              Pathetic!

              Comment


                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                Man STFU with your cornball ass. Ran in here like a phag to cape for your hero. Won't work today, alt!
                Lol I see we have a racist here.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Hype job View Post
                  Look at them all rallying against the next non-black star!

                  Pathetic!
                  Kovalev is non-black. In fact, he's almost certainly a racist. But he deserves to be a star more than Golovkin right now based on career achievements. I also think he's a better fighter overall.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                    Kovalev is non-black. In fact, he's almost certainly a racist. But he deserves to be a star more than Golovkin right now based on career achievements. I also think he's a better fighter overall.
                    Tru dat!

                    But most of the fl*mos rally against GGG because of his star appeal!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                      Kovalev is non-black. In fact, he's almost certainly a racist. But he deserves to be a star more than Golovkin right now based on career achievements. I also think he's a better fighter overall.
                      There's still a difference between being a star, who has the most career achievements, and who is the top P4P fighter among the 3.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP