Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Unloads Kitchen To Stop Game Duhaupas

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Ravens Fan View Post
    I am not writing Wilder off. I just don't believe that he is a very good fighter and never have. And since you keep going on and on about Wlad and Sanders I will ask you again what source do you have that had Sanders ranked at 334 in the world when Wlad fought him? Or are you just making 5hit up?

    As for Wlad fighting Sanders in his 6th defense. First off the WBO belt was a very marginal belt at the time and secondly Wlad had already fought and beat at least four Ring top ten fighters before he lost to Sanders. That is exactly three more than Wilder has fought to date. And according to Wilder he has the most meaningful belt and he is the heavyweight champion of the world.
    I got the ranking from Boxrec, which may not be correct. He had 195 points before the Klitschko fight, which today would rank him at #32, only 2 spots above Duhaupas. In any case, Sanders was a massive underdog who wasn't supposed to even look good against Klitschko let alone win. He had 3 rounds over 2 years, and prior to that had been knocked out by Hassim Rahman, over a year before his 7 or so total minutes to knock off his ring rust.

    Bermaine Stiverne is currently ranked #6 by The Ring, but Wilder has no top 10 guys on his record. LOL OK. If you don't like him, that's your opinion, and I can't argue against it. Wilder however has a lot of time left in the sport, and is athletically gifted to the point that he can be turned into a very good fighter. I keep going on and on about Klitschko and Sanders because Wlad and Wilder had been pros for the same amount of time. After being stopped by a guy that had no business being in the ring with him, a lot of people said Wlad wasn't good, but he stepped up his game and transformed into a HOF fighter. All I'm saying is give Wilder some time to develop instead of continually saying he isn't good. We already know he isn't good, but let's see what he becomes. Sorry for being optimistic about a promising fighter who happens to be very exciting :/
    Last edited by doom_specialist; 09-27-2015, 06:28 PM.

    Comment


      Originally posted by doom_specialist View Post
      I got the ranking from Boxrec, which may not be correct. He had 195 points before the Klitschko fight, which today would rank him at #32, only 2 spots above Duhaupas. In any case, Sanders was a massive underdog who wasn't supposed to even look good against Klitschko let alone win. He had 3 rounds over 2 years, and prior to that had been knocked out by Hassim Rahman, over a year before his 7 or so total minutes to knock off his ring rust.

      Bermaine Stiverne is currently ranked #6 by The Ring, but Wilder has no top 10 guys on his record. LOL OK. If you don't like him, that's your opinion, and I can't argue against it. Wilder however has a lot of time left in the sport, and is athletically gifted to the point that he can be turned into a very good fighter. I keep going on and on about Klitschko and Sanders because Wlad and Wilder had been pros for the same amount of time. After being stopped by a guy that had no business being in the ring with him, a lot of people said Wlad wasn't good, but he stepped up his game and transformed into a HOF fighter. All I'm saying is give Wilder some time to develop instead of continually saying he isn't good. We already know he isn't good, but let's see what he becomes. Sorry for being optimistic about a promising fighter who happens to be very exciting :/
      Agreed on all points... except.

      I think wilder IS good. With flaws.


      It's amazing to me the level of hate this guy is getting. Haha. Well you know what they say, if you getting that hate, you know you on your way.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Syf View Post
        Agreed on all points... except.

        I think wilder IS good. With flaws.


        It's amazing to me the level of hate this guy is getting. Haha. Well you know what they say, if you getting that hate, you know you on your way.
        I meant to say that Wilder wasn't that good yet, as opposed to saying he just wasn't good lol. But yes, he's definitely coming along as a fighter, and has all the tools to be something special. Speed, reach, height, athleticism, sturdy chin, and power. I think he's a rough night out for any fighter in his current state.

        Comment


          Originally posted by doom_specialist View Post
          I got the ranking from Boxrec, which may not be correct. He had 195 points before the Klitschko fight, which today would rank him at #32, only 2 spots above Duhaupas. In any case, Sanders was a massive underdog who wasn't supposed to even look good against Klitschko let alone win. He had 3 rounds over 2 years, and prior to that had been knocked out by Hassim Rahman, over a year before his 7 or so total minutes to knock off his ring rust.

          Bermaine Stiverne is currently ranked #6 by The Ring, but Wilder has no top 10 guys on his record. LOL OK. If you don't like him, that's your opinion, and I can't argue against it. Wilder however has a lot of time left in the sport, and is athletically gifted to the point that he can be turned into a very good fighter. I keep going on and on about Klitschko and Sanders because Wlad and Wilder had been pros for the same amount of time. After being stopped by a guy that had no business being in the ring with him, a lot of people said Wlad wasn't good, but he stepped up his game and transformed into a HOF fighter. All I'm saying is give Wilder some time to develop instead of continually saying he isn't good. We already know he isn't good, but let's see what he becomes. Sorry for being optimistic about a promising fighter who happens to be very exciting :/
          Oh, so now Sanders went from 334th in the world to 32nd?? Wow, I guess that was just a minor miscalculation on your part. But why should I be surprised? Because your math skills seem to be lacking. And why?

          Because I said that Wlad had already fought four top ten fighters by the time he had fought Sanders and that was three more than Wilder at this point. I will do the math for you. Four - three = one, and that one would be Stiverne.

          As far as Sanders is concerned yes he did in fact lose to Rahman, and I am paraphrasing but Rahman also stated that Sanders was the hardest puncher that he had ever faced. And unlike your sources that quote is pretty accurate and its also easy to find.

          Sanders was also a Southpaw with decent skills and pretty solid power. Part of his problem was that he wasn't the most dedicated or disciplined fighter. With that said I believe he is at least a level above Wilder's opponent from last night.

          Therefore, I believe it is ridiculous to try and compare him with that light hitting French club fighter that Wilder beat last night. And I truly believe that the majority of unbiased knowledgeable boxing fans would agree with that. I also don't hate Wilder again I just believe he isn't that good and I don't believe he will ever be that good. But I have been wrong before.
          Last edited by Ravens Fan; 09-28-2015, 06:50 AM.

          Comment


            Originally posted by doom_specialist View Post
            I meant to say that Wilder wasn't that good yet, as opposed to saying he just wasn't good lol. But yes, he's definitely coming along as a fighter, and has all the tools to be something special. Speed, reach, height, athleticism, sturdy chin, and power. I think he's a rough night out for any fighter in his current state.
            I suggest you sit down on the sofa...type in Anthony Joshua on YouTube .....watch his skills and fundamentals and then try and convince me wilder will be king of the heavyweights......if your still optimistic then I have some medication, straight jacket and a little secure room with white padding up the walls lol....I like ur positivity though brppppp

            Comment


              Originally posted by nacho daddy View Post
              and you hate GGG cause he is white so go to hell
              Which is why Ricky Hatton and Joe Calzage are two of my all-time favs. I don't hate GGG. I hate his delusional, d1ck suck'n ass fans. Big difference.

              Comment


                Originally posted by hitking View Post
                Which is why Ricky Hatton and Joe Calzage are two of my all-time favs. I don't hate GGG. I hate his delusional, d1ck suck'n ass fans. Big difference.
                OK but you are gonna compare GGG to hatton?? hahahahah

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP