Not Every Banned Substance Is A PED.

[-Hyperion-]

I'm talking about to the link of the Yahoo article. I mean good stuff because it is clear hauser is trying to spin **** and twist it up to cause controversy. Hauser is full of ****.

you mean you can't read.

[madsweeney]

I'm talking about to the link of the Yahoo article. I mean good stuff because it is clear hauser is trying to spin **** and twist it up to cause controversy. Hauser is full of ****.

It says nothing that is inconsistent with Hauser. The date it was posted (May 22) is consistent with Hauser's timeline.

[madsweeney]

you mean you can't read.

May have brushed his hair a little too hard.

[Build That Wall]

It says nothing that is inconsistent with Hauser. The date it was posted (May 22) is consistent with Hauser's timeline.

Hauser waited till close to Mayweathers next fight to come out with this crap. It's just like how miss jackson tried to sue mayweather for beating her, when there was no evidence at all and that everyone saw through her bull**** and that she was just digging for gold. Why else is she with a rich rapper now. Nelly is her Boytoy.

[Ahmed_Ismail]

USADA granted the TUE, NSAC is claiming they are testing agency and not authorized to grant exceptions.

Also that ****** link you guys keep posting is consistant with the information Hauser provided in his article (and Iole's post that it borrows from) dated May 22nd and do not mention when the TUE was requested/granted. In his article, Hauser claims NSAC and Top Rank confirm that TUE was requested on 19th and granted on 20th. So where is this contradiction of information?

Link from Yahoo to the exact sane article :



There's definitley contradiction of information, Yahoo say USADA granted and oversaw the TUE, Hauser said they knew nothing about ut until they got to Mayweather's home and found out/were told by Mayweather's medical team that he already had it.

Yahoo published their article on the 22nd of May and until now neither USADA nor NSAC saud anything regarding this until now, which to me proves they have no problem with whatever was written in the article and it makes more sense to believe the article that came out first, there's no reason why this had to wait 4 months to be written by Hauser, if Top Rank and NSAC knew about it and didn't like it on the 19th of May, why the hell didn't they say anything about it right then and there? Why wait 4 months? This just doesn't add up.

Can't wait to see what USADA and NSAC will say about this.

[Build That Wall]

Does Weed Enhance your performance. No. It doesn't do anything. Well, in the case of Chavez Jr, it makes him worse at everything.

[BrometheusBob.]

[Ahmed_Ismail]

USADA granted the TUE, NSAC is claiming they are testing agency and not authorized to grant exceptions.

Also that ****** link you guys keep posting is consistant with the information Hauser provided in his article (and Iole's post that it borrows from) are dated May 22nd and do not mention when the TUE was requested/granted. In his article, Hauser claims NSAC and Top Rank confirm that TUE was requested on 19th and granted on 20th. So where is this contradiction of information?

"Mayweather also applied for, and was given, a the****utic use exemption (TUE) for rehydration purposes after the May 1 weigh-in. He took two separate mixes. The first was a mixture of 250 ml of saline and multi-vitamins. The second was a 500 ml mixuture of saline and Vitamin C. He was urine tested both before and after taking the solutions.

Nevada rules permit the mixes that Mayweather took, but because USADA was overseeing the testing he applied for and was granted the TUE for them.

All tests came back negative."

[madsweeney]

Link from Yahoo to the exact sane article :



There's definitley contradiction of information, Yahoo say USADA granted and oversaw the TUE, Hauser said they knew nothing about ut until they got to Mayweather's home and found out/were told by Mayweather's medical team that he already had it.

Yahoo published their article on the 22nd of May and until now neither USADA nor NSAC saud anything regarding this until now, which to me proves they have no problem with whatever was written in the article and it makes more sense to believe the article that came out first, there's no reason why this had to wait 4 months to be written by Hauser, if Top Rank and NSAC knew about it and didn't like it on the 19th of May, why the hell didn't they say anything about it right then and there? Why wait 4 months? This just doesn't add up.

Can't wait to see what USADA and NSAC will say about this.

So because Iole didn't report it, it must not have happened? LMFAO.

Since you and BrushMyHair don't seem to be very bright, here's the definition of contradiction for you

Who knows the reason NSAC/Top Rank hasn't made a stink about it, IMO, they all corrupt as **** and probably didn't want litigation eating into their profits.

[Beercules]