Damn ward...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Froch Says No Thanks To Andre Ward, Eyes Chavez Jr.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostI agree. I'll never blame a fighter if he makes a choice that will get him more money.
A lot of these posters are hypocrites though. They'll defend Froch for this while at the same time they criticized Stevenson and Sergio and others for doing the exact same thing. Remember how they claimed to be REAL boxing fans not "businessmen and accountants?"
Well look at them now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostNo he'll be #1 in all the rankings, you don't keep the spot if you don't fight.
Bro you need to calm down or you're gonna end up back in the pen.
If Froch keeps fighting and never faces Ward again, that should count against him but his overall resume is so deep it won't matter much. Just validates the Ward loss in a way most would assume anyways and rightly so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostI agree. I'll never blame a fighter if he makes a choice that will get him more money.
A lot of these posters are hypocrites though. They'll defend Froch for this while at the same time they criticized Stevenson and Sergio and others for doing the exact same thing. Remember how they claimed to be REAL boxing fans not "businessmen and accountants?"
Well look at them now.
I defend Froch and Sergio for their decisions but neither of them are fighting guys like Forfarna. That's why I don't defend Stevenson.
You defend Stevenson like your life depended on it but whenever it's Froch, you always throw in this little caveat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostI agree. I'll never blame a fighter if he makes a choice ill get him more money.
A lot of these posters are hypocrites though. They'll defend Froch for this while at the same time they criticized Stevenson and Sergio and others for doing the exact same thing. Remember how they claimed to be REAL boxing fans not "businessmen and accountants?"
Well look at them now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostAnd that's my beef with these clowns on here. There's no consistency to their stances. Personally, I don't even have much interest in a Ward-Froch rematch. Outside of watching Froch get his ass kicked. But right now, they're the top guys in the division. There's no one currently in the division that's a threat to either. And both have made it clear they have no interest in moving up. So under the circumstances, that's the only fight at 68 that matters unless the Martinez-Cotto winner or GGG wants to move up to challenge one of those guys. And to me its lame as hell to applaud Froch for ducking the biggest fight in his division. Especially when you b1tch about others doing the same. Hell, the ones they b1tch about aren't even blatantly ducking like Froch is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostYou need to be more specific with who you're referring to.
I defend Froch and Sergio for their decisions but neither of them are fighting guys like Forfarna. That's why I don't defend Stevenson.
You defend Stevenson like your life depended on it but whenever it's Froch, you always throw in this little caveat.
Comment
-
So Carl Froch is a HOFer and Andre Ward is not? Based on what? How much of a draw he is? Ward blew through a tournament of the best fighters in his division without a loss. You are foolish!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostShowtime paid Stevenson 40% more for the Forfarna fight than HBO was willing to pay. No one was b1tchin' about Forfarna when it was gonna be a simulcast with that bum Kovalev last fought to set up a future Stevenson-Kovalev bout. And Stevenson is gonna make more for fighting Hopkins than he was gonna get to fight Kovalev. So how is that any different than what you're applauding Froch for doing?
Stevenson wanted ANOTHER tune-up
How is it different? Froch isn't fighting a Forfarna type opponent for less money than Ward offers, that's how.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostI agree. I'll never blame a fighter if he makes a choice that will get him more money.
A lot of these posters are hypocrites though. They'll defend Froch for this while at the same time they criticized Stevenson and Sergio and others for doing the exact same thing. Remember how they claimed to be REAL boxing fans not "businessmen and accountants?"
Well look at them now.
We might never see Stevenson v Kovalev, Martinez v Golovkin and Mayweather v Pacquiao and we know who's to blame in each case.
Froch fought everyone, and most of them away from home.Last edited by Weebler I; 06-05-2014, 06:29 PM.
Comment
Comment