this thread is getting stale. time to promote chris john some more. on march 31st chris john will go for the almighty 47-0 breaking the tie between him and joe calzaghe. wish him luck! you know he's gonna need it against TBA.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Cotto beats Pacquiao does he ranked above Mayweather?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postthis thread is getting stale. time to promote chris john some more. on march 31st chris john will go for the almighty 47-0 breaking the tie between him and joe calzaghe. wish him luck! you know he's gonna need it against TBA.
Mosley never needed a draw to keep his lightweight title
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rocky Rode View PostI don't remember where Mosley was ranked when Cotto fought him, but I do know Mosley was the lineal champion when Floyd fought him. Mosley was coming off one the best performances of his career. Was he a better fighter? I doubt it, but he was ranked at the top of his division.
Many people thought Clottey beat Cotto. But for the record, I put Clottey in the same category as Zab Judah. He was never an elite fighter and always found a way to lose fights.
Comment
-
the ts actually thinks that jabs shouldnt count in hit accuracy percentages so that way manny pacquiao will have a higher connect rate than floyd. he made a whole thread about it. this guy licks pacquiaos nuts to the highest degree and hates on floyd for everything. seriously dont feed this troll.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostToo bad the likes of Johnston and Casamayor are as good either.
Atleast Cesar Bazan was not only ranked, but ranked in the Top 5 of his Division at the time.
Something we can't say about many of Mosley's wins at Lightweight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostCezar Bazan is about as good as anyone Shane Mosley faced at Lightweight.
Atleast Cesar Bazan was not only ranked, but ranked in the Top 5 of his Division at the time.
Something we can't say about many of Mosley's wins at Lightweight.
Castillo resume at LW is greater than Mosley. I don't even like Oscar and his resume is greater than Mosley at LW. Hell some of Mosley best wins at LW were Oscar leftovers.
Mosley didn't even fight the best LW at the time. Which was Stevie Johnston. Mosley didn't fight the best guy. And, that would have been a damn good fight. A tough fight for Mosley IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostPeople just see Mosley record at LW...Which was what 33-0 with 30ko's? Or something like that at LW. So the idea is wow he's amazing. But, they're not looking at who he actually fought and when he fought them.
Castillo resume at LW is greater than Mosley. I don't even like Oscar and his resume is greater than Mosley at LW. Hell some of Mosley best wins at LW were Oscar leftovers.
Mosley didn't even fight the best LW at the time. Which was Stevie Johnston. Mosley didn't fight the best guy. And, that would have been a damn good fight. A tough fight for Mosley IMO.
The fact you have idiot's on this thread talking down to other's whilst in the same breath claiming Shane Mosley was one of the best Lightweight's ever is a joke.
The fact Title Defenses are used to justify idiocy is a joke. And it's becoming increasing to use that reasoning.
I understand not everyone is into the History and prefer to focus on modern times. And that's fine.
I just hate when people make brash, ******, uneducated and ignorant statements concerning the history of the sport when it's obvious they don't know ****.
I'll never understand why people feel the need to make comment's on things they clearly know nothing about. Why bother?
It's disrespectful to the sport.
Comment
Comment