Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum: Mayweather Refused Pacquiao Singapore Clash

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Everywhere View Post
    Use google...look up how many times guys like Mayweather, Hopkins, Wonjongkam, hell look up any boxer u can think of with a strap and compare them to Pacquiao...you will notice a huge deficiency in the title defense department...Pacquiao is one of the most amazing boxers I have ever watched, but his lack of title defenses is disconcerting...
    dont need to. i was simply proving you sayin pac has had " less than 4 title defenses is wrong" and tbh, it's ******ed. and bhop , floyd or pong cant' **** with pac's resume.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Tulisanto View Post
      clottey and shane
      mosley a wbo mandatory? can't check up on this, as the wbo has a ****ty defunct new webpage, but the fact is he never fought kell brook, his long time mandatory. warren lined himup but pac wouldn't fight him, and magically retained the belt.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Tulisanto View Post
        dont need to. i was simply proving you sayin pac has had " less than 4 title defenses is wrong" and tbh, it's ******ed. and bhop , floyd or pong cant' **** with pac's resume.
        So you admit that "Fighter of the Decade, 8 division World Champion" Manny Pacquiao has never defended a single strap more than 4 times in his entire life? He blatantly ducked Junior Jones, Humberto Soto, and Joan Guzman...he even spent years and divisions running away from JMM...Pac's resume does speak for itself, he is easily one of the 3 best fighters I have witnessed in my life, but the guy is a casualty of boxing just like every other boxer.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Everywhere View Post
          Pacquiao hasn't defended a strap more than 4 times in his entire career...that speaks volumes about who the actual "coward duck" is....his lack of title defenses speak for themselves...
          True greatness is ALL about divisional supremacy and defenses.

          It is about who you fought, but more importantly, when you fought them.

          Pacquiao's timing has been..... impeccable

          Even Freddie Roach admits that Manny is too big for Marquez, and that Marquez is no good above 135. *******s are fkn clowns.

          Comment


            Originally posted by b morph View Post
            idk what the eff LeadUppercut is talking about here. manny agreed to mayweather's demands.....
            You fkn moron.....

            The only official negotiation died when Manny walked away from the table and refused to undertake random blood tests without a 24-day cutoff.....

            http://krikya360.com/pacquiao-...day-cut--27427



            Comment


              Originally posted by b morph View Post
              and blood testing and random drug testing wouldn't work in boxing, too many loopholes, too much money, they couldn't possibly do it for every friggin boxing match do u have any idea how many professional boxing matches take place? they wouldn't have the resources, maybe for the ppv fights and the main events they can do it, MAYBE
              Oh yes, stricter drug testing would be terrible for boxing.

              And that was your 3rd post huh ?

              You pig-ignorant clown

              Comment


                Originally posted by Everywhere View Post
                So you admit that "Fighter of the Decade, 8 division World Champion" Manny Pacquiao has never defended a single strap more than 4 times in his entire life? He blatantly ducked Junior Jones, Humberto Soto, and Joan Guzman...he even spent years and divisions running away from JMM...Pac's resume does speak for itself, he is easily one of the 3 best fighters I have witnessed in my life, but the guy is a casualty of boxing just like every other boxer.
                get this. i stated that pac has defended his title at 122 4times already ( altho 1 was adraw) and twice with his ww title. can you do basic math coz thats jut 2 titles right there. jones got destryed by morales , thats new lol. soto? serouisoly ? pac has only fought at 135 once , he never planned on stayin there so guzman is irrelevant.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Tulisanto View Post
                  get this. i stated that pac has defended his title at 122 4times already ( altho 1 was adraw) and twice with his ww title. can you do basic math coz thats jut 2 titles right there. jones got destryed by morales , thats new lol. soto? serouisoly ? pac has only fought at 135 once , he never planned on stayin there so guzman is irrelevant.
                  So he only successfully defended his title at 122 three times...Pacquiao has never defended a strap in victory more than three times, thank you for clarifying that to me.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Everywhere View Post
                    So he only successfully defended his title at 122 three times...Pacquiao has never defended a strap in victory more than three times, thank you for clarifying that to me.
                    believe what you want but pac being a lineal champion in 4 divisions alone prove your full of **** but like i said, an idiot is an idot no matter what.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Tulisanto View Post
                      dont need to. i was simply proving you sayin pac has had " less than 4 title defenses is wrong" and tbh, it's ******ed. and bhop , floyd or pong cant' **** with pac's resume.
                      You are nothing but a flag-waving fanboy.

                      Hopkins middleweight reign alone p1sses on Pacquiao's entire career, a career which is not only manufactured, but is likely fraudulent as well.

                      Hopkins many wins since then against highly favored opponents, puts him streaks ahead. Even James Toney is likely a better fighter now than Pacquiao has ever been.

                      When is the last time that Pacquiao fought a live dog ?

                      Let me give you a tip, it was nearly 4 years ago you fkn moron, and guess what..... the entire developed world knows that Pacquiao lost that fight..... hell, check out the look on Pac's face before the winner was announced, he was a beaten man, he knows he lost that fight.

                      Name one great fighter that Pacquiao beat when the guy was in his prime ?

                      Pacquiao had certainly not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez, and since then he has fought NOBODY except old men, faded champions, and bums, so your undying fanboy adoration is absurd.

                      Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has never done anything like that..... he has tip-toed through the tulips by fighting old men, faded champions, and bums, at catchweight..... what a hype-job.

                      Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers. Questions like.....

                      * Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

                      * Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

                      * Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.

                      * Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

                      * Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

                      * Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

                      * Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

                      Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

                      I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

                      WTF ?

                      Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

                      Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

                      Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
                      * looked you squarely in the eye
                      * p1ssed in your pocket
                      * told you that it was raining
                      * laughed in your face

                      FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down at least one whole level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

                      Unless you address those unanswered questions, they will follow you until you leave this site.

                      Believe it ^^

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP