There is no point in explaining it further as you don't get it nor my point
but i'm not stressing any legal point...all i said was boxing forum posters like you and me should not act like they know more than the lawyers. and that's what exactly what you did...you acted like a know-it-all guy who can't even stand firm on his opinions.
and i don't need your explanation...please don't throw that out to my face. if i need one i will go to somebody else but you
What never made sense about that particular allegation is who would so dumb enough to put such a thing in a e-mail? It's not even like relations were cordial with the other side.
Oh well, we'll find out if it exists. But I doubt it.
What never made sense about that particular allegation is who would so dumb enough to put such a thing in a e-mail? It's not even like relations were cordial with the other side.
Oh well, we'll find out if it exists. But I doubt it.
Hahahahahaha!!! The funny thing is Floyd was ****** enough to think that this set up was viable and people would not see right through it... This is the first thought that would have honestly crossed most sensible peoples brains.. *****s not included.
Most of the stuff you use in a lawsuit turns out to be meaningless, but you still put them in there just in case they turn out to be useful.
If one point turns out to be unfounded then you just drop it and go to another one of the many points you have it does not hurt the rest of your case unless it is a key point that is the foundation of multiple points then you lose all that come from that tree.
Why are you educating all these uneducated morons? Why? seriously..
When was the last time someone was charged with one count of something? Ahh well. You're talking to people who celebrated when a judge announced the case could go to court one year later
but i'm not stressing any legal point...all i said was boxing forum posters like you and me should not act like they know more than the lawyers. and that's what exactly what you did...you acted like a know-it-all guy who can't even stand firm on his opinions.
and i don't need your explanation...please don't throw that out to my face. if i need one i will go to somebody else but you
Keep searching~ you might come up with a real point before the end of the day.
Don't put you and I on the same level on this topic~ we are as far apart as an ant and a hawk, this thread has shown it.
My opinion is firm I don't find this very meaningful nor do I think it will mean much.
no need to make this complicated... Tim Smith just need to decide if he wants to lie under oath (or not) and say who leak this info to him, GBP/Mayweathers or not.
Am sure they would have to call Tim smith to the stand, Not sure if he can reveal his source in a court of law or not, At the end of the day it might open a can of worm if a journalist is told to reveal his source over just 5M dollars.
The thing that makes me laugh is the "oh you don't know anything about this topic just because we are on the internet" alright if you say so~
These people claim you arent a lawyer yet they act like one, somethings are just basic simple things that you know as you grow up in any civilised world, Am not a lawyer but i do know a few things.
Comment