Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao Lawsuit: "It was Floyd's camp who told Tim Smith about the FAKE emails"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #161
    Originally posted by Ray* View Post
    Am sure they would have to call Tim smith to the stand, Not sure if he can reveal his source in a court of law or not, At the end of the day it might open a can of worm if a journalist is told to reveal his source over just 5M dollars.
    I don't think he has to at least not in this situation. If it was a real criminal case maybe but even then there are rules to protect journalistic sources, it would have to be some real serious shit which they have no other way to prove

    Comment

      #162
      Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
      Keep searching~ you might come up with a real point before the end of the day.


      Don't put you and I on the same level on this topic~ we are as far apart as an ant and a hawk, this thread has shown it.


      My opinion is firm I don't find this very meaningful nor do I think it will mean much.
      you're not just a fake know-it-all guy but also a self-exalting bigot

      if you know a lot about the law you should be in the court right now defending somebody not in boxing forums posting garbage.

      Comment

        #163
        Originally posted by brick wall View Post
        you're not just a fake know-it-all guy but also a self-exalting bigot

        if you know a lot about the law you should be in the court right now defending somebody not in boxing forums posting garbage.
        Whatever you say~ keep on searching.

        I don't work all the time~ also currently I have pneumonia so keep on judging.


        Plus this is a good place to stay sharp both in terms of writing (as I try to write in real English) and in terms of debate.

        Comment

          #164
          Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
          I don't think he has to at least not in this situation. If it was a real criminal case maybe but even then there are rules to protect journalistic sources, it would have to be some real serious shit which they have no other way to prove
          Am pretty sure they wouldnt or cannot even call the journalist onto the stand but i would let these Pacquiao fans be the lawyer for the day.

          Comment

            #165
            Originally posted by Ray* View Post
            Am pretty sure they wouldnt or cannot even call the journalist onto the stand but i would let these Pacquiao fans be the lawyer for the day.
            I do need to go lay down, I have expended to much energy. I do hate to leave something half finished though

            Comment

              #166
              Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
              Whatever you say~ keep on searching.

              I don't work all the time~ also currently I have pneumonia so keep on judging.


              Plus this is a good place to stay sharp both in terms of writing (as I try to write in real English) and in terms of debate.
              you know what? i don't really understand what kind of satisfaction do you get from bragging about what you know over the internet to a random guy. it's ****** really to say the least. you don't impress people with that and you haven't really shown you know a lot...it's not even a good try.

              Comment

                #167
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
                They have to prove nothing, they only need prove
                Lol just STFU before you contradict yourself some more. You know a lot about the legal system, huh? You probably don't even know the burden of proof in a civil case like this.

                Comment

                  #168
                  Originally posted by Ray* View Post
                  Am sure they would have to call Tim smith to the stand, Not sure if he can reveal his source in a court of law or not, At the end of the day it might open a can of worm if a journalist is told to reveal his source over just 5M dollars.
                  true that he doesn't need to testify... but he can for the right price/persuasion.
                  he can waive his journalistic rights, especially if he feels we was lied to and put his reputation on the line.

                  Comment

                    #169
                    Originally posted by Malicious View Post
                    Lol just STFU before you contradict yourself some more. You know a lot about the legal system, huh? You probably don't even know the burden of proof in a civil case like this.
                    It is less but they still have to prove to a pretty high standard to actually win.

                    The defense is always all about doubt, there is no proving just casting doubt on the other sides case and there are any number of ways to do it without proving anything.

                    Comment

                      #170
                      Originally posted by brick wall View Post
                      you know what? i don't really understand what kind of satisfaction do you get from bragging about what you know over the internet to a random guy. it's ****** really to say the least. you don't impress people with that and you haven't really shown you know a lot...it's not even a good try.
                      Keep on searching~

                      Glad you feel that way though, someone like you thinking that of me is a compliment

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP