Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Joe Calzaghe was/is extremely lucky to have stayed undefeated

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones View Post
    if anyone is ****** it appears to be you boy.

    I like Joe Calzaghe becuase i found his fights entertaining. I liked his high stamina, great hand speed and good chin. His technical abilities were also good.

    Now chill out kiddo. stop acting the hard man.
    Bravo!

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by DreamSparkz View Post
      Except he had bad hands and his fight against Saiko Bika was a tought one since Bika came from the School of Hopkins.
      Yes, those two do seem to fight like its a street-fight.

      Comment


        #33
        Whoever says luck did not play a part is not being realistic. Do you think Pernell Whitaker deserved the decision he got against JLR ? now i know you aint going to tell me Whitaker is not as talented as Calzaghe.

        Anything can happen in a fight and no one, i repeat no one is good enough to calculate for every eventuality no matter how good they are/were.

        I think Calzaghe's skill was a big factor but to deny he has also had a bit of lucky on his side is not realistic imo. I dont think he has ever been cut in his career has he ? no one can be that calculated as to avoid stuff like that, that kind of thing has happened to better fighters than Calzgahe so dont tell me its because Joe is that great.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by BEEHOP View Post
          Floyd does it without luck.
          Hahaha sure he does

          If you go through your career undefeated you are luck no matter who you are.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
            Whoever says luck did not play a part is not being realistic. Do you think Pernell Whitaker deserved the decision he got against JLR ? now i know you aint going to tell me Whitaker is not as talented as Calzaghe.
            .
            I have them rated equal in skills, they don't fight exactly the same but they do throw punches from great angles which requires skills and great timing. And people give me red k on here for saying anything bad about Chavez... But I don't think Chavez was that good, I believe he fought much smaller guys than himself and was embarrassed at times in the fight with Whitaker.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by JosephFelice View Post
              I have them rated equal in skills, they don't fight exactly the same but they do throw punches from great angles which requires skills and great timing. And people give me red k on here for saying anything bad about Chavez... But I don't think Chavez was that good, I believe he fought much smaller guys than himself and was embarrassed at times in the fight with Whitaker.

              Whitaker was far more skilled than Calzaghe imo.

              Whitaker also made Haugen, Azumah Nelson, Roger Mayweather Vasquez, Jose Luis Ramirez look pedestrian.

              Calzaghe put on a couple of white washes but Whitaker did it on a regular basis.

              I can give you at least 3,4 flawless performances to watch of Whitaker where you jaw will be on the floor at the skill level he had.

              Calzaghe never beat no Azumah Nelson, JCC.

              Chavez beat the living day lights out of good fighters like Camacho, Haugen, Mayweather,, Rosario so i dont know how you call him overrated, if you have had over 80/90+ fights you might stop slipping a bit towards the end, no shame in getting dominated by Whitaker he did it to many good fighters.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones View Post
                lucky he doesn't step in the ring with a opponent who is capable of beating him.
                It's not his fault that he's so much better than everyone at or near his weight class. Floyd's resume and skills are at least 2X better than Joe's.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                  Whitaker was far more skilled than Calzaghe imo.

                  Whitaker also made Haugen, Azumah Nelson, Roger Mayweather Vasquez, Jose Luis Ramirez look pedestrian.

                  Calzaghe put on a couple of white washes but Whitaker did it on a regular basis.

                  I can give you at least 3,4 flawless performances to watch of Whitaker where you jaw will be on the floor at the skill level he had.

                  Calzaghe never beat no Azumah Nelson, JCC.

                  Chavez beat the living day lights out of good fighters like Camacho, Haugen, Mayweather,, Rosario so i dont know how you call him overrated, if you have had over 80/90+ fights you might stop slipping a bit towards the end, no shame in getting dominated by Whitaker he did it to many good fighters.
                  Roger Mayweather Vasquez?? Who is he, I never heard of him before. Lol! Just breaking your balls.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by BadNewz View Post
                    Yes he did. Calzaghe was basically Sven Ottke II.
                    You are a ****head.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      I would not call that luck cuz CALZAGHE is ATG!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP