Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Man wins $750K lawsuit against wife's lover

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #11
    In Sicily both the wife and the lover would be dead, not sued.

    Comment

      #12
      Why get married if you're prone to being a cheating, unfaithful piece of shlt ?

      Comment

        #13
        Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
        Thats some beta ass sh^t to sue someone over, but seems like it a nice ROI on a failed relationship.
        is 750k bruv, the other guy get 8mil+. i wont mind if the whole call me cuck for that kind of money.

        Comment

          #14
          Exactly take my wife you give me 3/4 of a million and buy my under aged children. Of course I get to keep my pension 100%!

          Comment

            #15
            ****** ruling, once again completely absolving the woman of any responsibility, even though she is the one to blame and the only one that broke any vows/contract.

            Comment

              #16
              Originally posted by Mooshashi View Post
              In Sicily both the wife and the lover would be dead, not sued.
              Does O.J. live there?

              Comment

                #17
                Originally posted by Curtis Harper View Post
                Why get married if you're prone to being a cheating, unfaithful piece of shlt ?
                The Tax Breaks.

                Comment

                  #18
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  ****** ruling, once again completely absolving the woman of any responsibility, even though she is the one to blame and the only one that broke any vows/contract.
                  We call what the paramour did tortious interference by criminal conversation. His knowing and intentional actions caused to her to breach the contract. That said, it must be noted that not all jurisdictions allow for this type of recovery. In fact it's very few.

                  Addendum: Her negligent actions in relation to the marital contract would be addressed in the subsequent cause based divorce and property settlement agreement

                  Comment

                    #19
                    Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                    We call what the paramour did tortious interference by criminal conversation. His knowing and intentional actions caused to her to breach the contract. That said, it must be noted that not all jurisdictions allow for this type of recovery. In fact it's very few.

                    Addendum: Her negligent actions in relation to the marital contract would be addressed in the subsequent cause based divorce and property settlement agreement
                    Maybe the husband not being able to keep her ***ually satisfied made her go out and get some.


                    ****** laws.

                    Comment

                      #20
                      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                      Maybe the husband not being able to keep her ***ually satisfied made her go out and get some.


                      ****** laws.
                      His impotency could be raised as a grounds for divorce, but not as a defense to Infidelity.

                      And if I remember the lecture correctly, that law is one that is retained from the English common law system, but I'm not 100% certain on that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP