What Army Head To Head Could Beat The US?

[MokMok]

the chinese got slaughtered.

that south vietnamese general shouldn't be talking since the reason u.s. was there was because of south vietnamese military weakness.

sounds like made up bs quote anyway since it's similar to a quote attributed to hannibals general during his italian campaign.

The CHinese got slaughtered yes. Does it matter? No.

Only fools equate victory with mere casualty numbers. No wonder the Americans got utterly defeated by the vietcong. A far inferior military force.

The Vietcong got slaughtered also. Does it matter. Yes. Because Giap actually foresaw that it is the only way to victory.

Did the US saw that coming? No.

Simple reasons why the US lost both wars. Korea is considered a loss since the Chinese merely intended a stalemate and got it.

And so followed losses in Iraq, Afghanistan and next will be WW3 with Iran.

Having the best military equipment in the world doesn't equate with being the BEST MILITARY in the world.

[MokMok]

America will NEVER submit to rule from an invader!!!!!!!!!!

I hate to say it but you are already ruled by an invader.

Organized giant banks.

[Mike Tyson77]

I hate to say it but you are already ruled by an invader.

Organized giant banks.

Bane already cracked the stock market. ..

[miron_lang]

Maybe Russia/China h2h but that's MAD.

US always gets owned via guerrilla tactics.

Army?

No Nukes? just tanks and foot soldiers?

where does this takes place?



China might have a chance

[Mike Tyson77]

The CHinese got slaughtered yes. Does it matter? No.

Only fools equate victory with mere casualty numbers. No wonder the Americans got utterly defeated by the vietcong. A far inferior military force.

The Vietcong got slaughtered also. Does it matter. Yes. Because Giap actually foresaw that it is the only way to victory.

Did the US saw that coming? No.

Simple reasons why the US lost both wars. Korea is considered a loss since the Chinese merely intended a stalemate and got it.

And so followed losses in Iraq, Afghanistan and next will be WW3 with Iran.

Having the best military equipment in the world doesn't equate with being the BEST MILITARY in the world.

this is the most delusional thing ive ever read

[miron_lang]

ignorance.

The Russians had a major part.


Less than 2M German troops in the West while more than 5M troops in the Eastern FRONT.


Imagine 7M Troops defending instead of 2M plus so many more tanks and guns. Luckily Hitler is ****** enough to invade USSR.

[Left Hook Tua]

The CHinese got slaughtered yes. Does it matter? No.

Only fools equate victory with mere casualty numbers. No wonder the Americans got utterly defeated by the vietcong. A far inferior military force.

The Vietcong got slaughtered also. Does it matter. Yes. Because Giap actually foresaw that it is the only way to victory.

Did the US saw that coming? No.

Simple reasons why the US lost both wars. Korea is considered a loss since the Chinese merely intended a stalemate and got it.

And so followed losses in Iraq, Afghanistan and next will be WW3 with Iran.

Having the best military equipment in the world doesn't equate with being the BEST MILITARY in the world.

garbage......

[Left Hook Tua]

The Russians had a major part.


Less than 2M German troops in the West while more than 5M troops in the Eastern FRONT.


Imagine 7M Troops defending instead of 2M plus so many more tanks and guns. Luckily Hitler is ****** enough to invade USSR.

did i say the russians didn't play a major part?

[MokMok]

garbage......

As i've said.

Only fools equate victory with mere casualty numbers.

Thus the US historically lost the Korean and Nam wars. And then went on to lose Iraq and Afghanistan.

I remember all quite well this saying. To those who do not want to hear the truth, delusion is sweet.

[BERNIE'S CORNER]

did i say the russians didn't play a major part?

Yeah, you said that !!!