Rashard Mendenhall... The conspiracy theorist

[MidnightSpecial]

By: Brent Blanchard director of field operations at Protec Documentation Services, a company that documents the work of building-demolition contractors

Here's a summary

Assertion 1: "The towers collapses looked exactly like explosive demolitions"
Protec Comment: Blasting engineers understand that building implosion work best when forces of gravity are maximized... This was not the case in the collapse of Tower 1 and 2. Examinations of videos do not show failure at the lower levels. Rather they clearly show failure at the location where the airplane struck.

Assertion 2: "But they fell down straight in their own footprint"
Protec Comment: They did not, they followed the path of least resistance, and there was alot of resistance... When the impact floors of both towers failed, the upper sections did not simply just tumble onto the streets below, rather they tilted while simultaneously falling downward... As we know significant amount of debris rained down around the surrounding blocks... These facts indicate that a relatively small amount of structural support debris actually landed straight down within the towers' footprint, making this event notably dissimilar to a planned demolition event.

Assertion 3: "Explosive charges can be seen violently shooting out the sides during the collapse."
Protec Comment: No, air and debris can be seen pushing violently outward which is natural and predictable effect of rapid structural collapse.

Assertion 5: Thermite was found in the wreckage and debris showing melted steel.
Protec Comment: We have come across no evidence to support this claim.

Assertion 7: Building 7 was not hit yet still collapsed, this must have been due to explosives.
Protec Comment: If explosives were used within WT7 then seismographs within the general area would have detected the activity in the ground vibrations... Video and photographic evidence show substantial falling debris hit building 6, and 7.

Assertion 8: A steel framed building has never collapsed due to fire, yet three collapse on one day... explosives must have been used.
Protec Comment: No, it actually means three building collapsed due to fire (and violent external forces) in one day... The fact is, many steel structures have collapsed due to fire. And as with those failures, the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 involved specific structural conditions. Each failure showed characteristics dissimilar to the other two, and in no case have we come across of evidence of explosives being present or affecting any of those conditions.

He was on the governments bill! You cant believe what you hear man!!!!

You dont get the truth!

[jabsRstiff]

Our military and government could not even cover up the death of PAT TILLMAN in Afghanistan. He was a lone soldier in a very foreign land, killed by "friendly fire". The powers-that-be couldn't keep that isoalted incident under wraps, yet we are to believe they're capable of covering up what happened on 9/11?

[Danny Gunz]

He was on the governments bill! You cant believe what you hear man!!!!

You dont get the truth!

Haha, there is a certain former poster who would have probably given a response like this.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

He was on the governments bill! You cant believe what you hear man!!!!

You dont get the truth!

So you INSTANTLY belive the opposite view point...lololololol.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Our military and government could not even cover up the death of PAT TILLMAN in Afghanistan. He was a lone soldier in a very foreign land, killed by "friendly fire". The powers-that-be couldn't keep that isoalted incident under wraps, yet we are to believe they're capable of covering up what happened on 9/11?

Have you been living under a rock? Countless Millions still think 19 scrubs with box cutters flew planes into WTC.

[BigStereotype]

Our military and government could not even cover up the death of PAT TILLMAN in Afghanistan. He was a lone soldier in a very foreign land, killed by "friendly fire". The powers-that-be couldn't keep that isoalted incident under wraps, yet we are to believe they're capable of covering up what happened on 9/11?

Perfect example. That is exactly what I was trying to say.

[squealpiggy]

Have you been living under a rock? Countless Millions still think 19 scrubs with box cutters flew planes into WTC.

A moment ago you were saying that there was no answer to the building 7 question. Now you have the answer to the building 7 question you've changed to a different baseless assertion.

[-The Glove-]

Thanks for passing up my post AGAIN.

[Danny Gunz]

A moment ago you were saying that there was no answer to the building 7 question. Now you have the answer to the building 7 question you've changed to a different baseless assertion.

That seems to be the trend lol.

[New England]

if your name reps huge companies for big bucks you cant say stuff like this in a manner such as twitter
maybe in your house w/ your buddies
but not on twitter


unfortunate
but truth