Rashard Mendenhall... The conspiracy theorist

[Danny Gunz]

I guess it was "timed". Or maybe these idiots think demolitions where placed there ahead of time.

It kills me when people claim it was a controlled demolition.

The biggest demolition job ever done was on a building half the size of one of the World Trade Tower. That job took 7 months to prepare for the demolition. Now imagine how long it would take to demolish both the WTC. Keep in mind that it would have to be done so that no one would notice the demolition job taking place.

[-The Glove-]

It kills me when people claim it was a controlled demolition.

The biggest demolition job ever done was on a building half the size of one of the World Trade Tower. That job took 7 months to prepare for the demolition. Now imagine how long it would take to demolish both the WTC. Keep in mind that it would have to be done so that no one would notice the demolition job taking place.

Ding, ding, ding!!

[BigStereotype]

What really cracks me up is the unbelievable two-facedness of the theory. So this government is so ****ing shady and ruthless that they can orchestrate all this **** without a hitch or anybody knowing, but they'll just sit on their hands and let these facts spread? Why aren't some more instigators dead?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

If it was a controlled demolition, why the need to hi-jack planes?

So you can blame it on the planes and on Bin Laden when it was really the U.S.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

It kills me when people claim it was a controlled demolition.

The biggest demolition job ever done was on a building half the size of one of the World Trade Tower. That job took 7 months to prepare for the demolition. Now imagine how long it would take to demolish both the WTC. Keep in mind that it would have to be done so that no one would notice the demolition job taking place.

Cmon Danny watch this and you tell me that buildings fall like that.

[D.I.E.S.E.L]

[withoutthee666]

Rashard's not a dumb guy either, which makes this all the more shocking. Unfortunately, Rashard is one of those "Black Pride" guys. And often, black pride and American pride obviously don't commingle.

Fellow poster No Ceilings is like this as well. Unfortunately, he wasn't born with athletic ability, just a chair and a keyboard, and chips.

[-The Glove-]

So you can blame it on the planes and on Bin Laden when it was really the U.S.

Wouldn't a bomb attack make more sense? If the goal was to take out the WTC, why crash a plane into a field in PA and one into the Pentagon (the WTC surely would've been more than enough)? If it was really an inside job, you'd think with all this planning they'd ensure the "hijackers" would be able to accomplish their task without a couple passengers overtaking them. I understand the shroud of doubt the WTC crashes leave, but those weren't the only buildings attacked and those weren't the only planes hijacked.

[Danny Gunz]

Cmon Danny watch this and you tell me that buildings fall like that.

By: Brent Blanchard director of field operations at Protec Documentation Services, a company that documents the work of building-demolition contractors

Here's a summary

Assertion 1: "The towers collapses looked exactly like explosive demolitions"
Protec Comment: Blasting engineers understand that building implosion work best when forces of gravity are maximized... This was not the case in the collapse of Tower 1 and 2. Examinations of videos do not show failure at the lower levels. Rather they clearly show failure at the location where the airplane struck.

Assertion 2: "But they fell down straight in their own footprint"
Protec Comment: They did not, they followed the path of least resistance, and there was alot of resistance... When the impact floors of both towers failed, the upper sections did not simply just tumble onto the streets below, rather they tilted while simultaneously falling downward... As we know significant amount of debris rained down around the surrounding blocks... These facts indicate that a relatively small amount of structural support debris actually landed straight down within the towers' footprint, making this event notably dissimilar to a planned demolition event.

Assertion 3: "Explosive charges can be seen violently shooting out the sides during the collapse."
Protec Comment: No, air and debris can be seen pushing violently outward which is natural and predictable effect of rapid structural collapse.

Assertion 5: Thermite was found in the wreckage and debris showing melted steel.
Protec Comment: We have come across no evidence to support this claim.

Assertion 7: Building 7 was not hit yet still collapsed, this must have been due to explosives.
Protec Comment: If explosives were used within WT7 then seismographs within the general area would have detected the activity in the ground vibrations... Video and photographic evidence show substantial falling debris hit building 6, and 7.

Assertion 8: A steel framed building has never collapsed due to fire, yet three collapse on one day... explosives must have been used.
Protec Comment: No, it actually means three building collapsed due to fire (and violent external forces) in one day... The fact is, many steel structures have collapsed due to fire. And as with those failures, the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 involved specific structural conditions. Each failure showed characteristics dissimilar to the other two, and in no case have we come across of evidence of explosives being present or affecting any of those conditions.

[D.I.E.S.E.L]

Rashard's not a dumb guy either, which makes this all the more shocking. Unfortunately, Rashard is one of those "Black Pride" guys. And often, black pride and American pride obviously don't commingle.

Fellow poster No Ceilings is like this as well. Unfortunately, he wasn't born with athletic ability, just a chair and a keyboard, and chips.

Lol. You never know, maybe he lost weight and got in good shape.