Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do some religious people ridicule Sciences beliefs on how the Universe came to be

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Mr. Shen View Post
    then where did god come from?
    Moot Point.

    Either a Deity put in place a network of structure,

    Or our existence as we know it is ALIVE.

    It is all omnipotent all inherent and referred to as "Mother Nature"

    Pick one. But what we do know through modern science is that it tends to skew towards the latter in that existence itself dictates all.

    Atoms are alive? Yes.

    Not stating that Atoms share biological characteristics.

    But they're set in place by something other than a physical reaction and something that's more predetermined.



    | |

    Comment


      #72
      Religion is the root of all evil. /thread

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Mr. Shen View Post
        then where did god come from?
        God just created itself. God was a dot that expanded in to this being who then created us and all of our surroundings.

        Comment


          #74
          If you follow a Scientific Step by Step Methodology good luck in determining our existence. What I do know is that we can strip all biology/physics down to a basic cellular unit and when that's done we begin the questions.



          | |

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by -Kevin- View Post
            God just created itself. God was a dot that expanded in to this being who then created us and all of our surroundings.
            What this guy said.

            More than likely that "dot" put in place by something else.

            Then something else, Then something else.

            The essence of creation.



            | |

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by RunW/Knives View Post
              Moot Point.

              Either a Deity put in place a network of structure,

              Or our existence as we know it is ALIVE.

              It is all omnipotent all inherent and referred to as "Mother Nature"

              Pick one. But what we do know through modern science is that it tends to skew towards the latter in that existence itself dictates all.

              Atoms are alive? Yes.
              how are they alive? and what do you mean by our existence as being alive?

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Mr. Shen View Post
                how are they alive? and what do you mean by our existence as being alive?
                It not that it necessarily has a mind of it's own............but.

                Look at how Viruses work. They're not living......yet they act like life?

                WTF? Makes you think about Partical activity/Entropy



                | |

                Comment


                  #78
                  By the same if at all transient properties.....

                  I could assume my computer chair will morph into a particular being that completely takes my body over in host fashion.



                  | |

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by RunW/Knives View Post
                    It not that it necessarily has a mind of it's own............but.

                    Look at how Viruses work. They're not living......yet they act like life?

                    WTF? Makes you think about Partical activity/Entropy
                    nah browian motion makes perfect sense the random motion is more then accounted for. the random ness is like a box that you put 5 balls into each ball having 5 units of energy. lets say these balls bounce around forever and the energy put into the box never changes. now an hour later you come back to the box and measure the energy of all the balls. some balls might be at 10 or 20 now while the other ones are at 1 and 2 theres still 25 units of energy but how its dispersed is random which accounts for the random Brownian motion.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Mr. Shen View Post
                      nah browian motion makes perfect sense the random motion is more then accounted for. the random ness is like a box that you put 5 balls into each ball having 5 units of energy. lets say these balls bounce around forever and the energy put into the box never changes. now an hour later you come back to the box and measure the energy of all the balls. some balls might be at 10 or 20 now while the other ones are at 1 and 2 theres still 25 units of energy but how its dispersed is random which accounts for the random Brownian motion.
                      Right but my point was this stuff is bound to physical theory.

                      You're correct and you win, scientifically.

                      But what dictates all the universal pull outside of what science explains "gravity" to be. Seems like a routine force that is unexplained.

                      What created Gravity and what holds objects in place?



                      | |

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP