Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How come White Europeans like to attack the Middle-Eastern people?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by Carnivore
    No, that's not true. I've always been supportive of the Semitic Middle Eastern people like Arabs.

    And I've objected to the white Eastern European religious group attacking them with hateful propaganda.
    So you would support Semitic ***s then?


    Others don't use propaganda?
    Last edited by Benny Leonard; 11-22-2009, 06:34 PM.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by Carnivore
      No, that's not true. I've always been supportive of the Semitic Middle Eastern people like Arabs.

      And I've objected to the white Eastern European religious group attacking them with hateful propaganda.
      You silly twat. "I'm not anti-semitic. The ***s I hate are not a semitic people!"

      Are you suggesting that this group of ******s went on the attack in order to expand their own power?
      It was an expanding empire. Hard to call it a group. More of a multitude.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post

        It was an expanding empire. Hard to call it a group. More of a multitude.


        Just wanted to clarify that for our viewer it wasn't "ALL"

        If there are 1 million people of a belief system, and only 999,999 of those people attack, that 1 who doesn't because he/she feels different would not make "all"

        But, to dig into the point: These people that went on the "expansion" trail, they used force and did harm to others?

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Benny Leonard View Post


          Just wanted to clarify that for our viewer it wasn't "ALL"

          If there are 1 million people of a belief system, and only 999,999 of those people attack, that 1 who doesn't because he/she feels different would not make "all"

          But, to dig into the point: These people that went on the "expansion" trail, they used force and did harm to others?
          Absolutely, in the same way that every empire in history has done. I mean the Pax Romanus and Pax Britannica were times of relative prosperity and ease for those living through them, but the peace under Rome took a hundred years of turmoil to establish and the peace under Britain necessitated the clash of empires including the Dutch, Spanish and French first and was brought to an end at the hands of the Germanic empires.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
            Absolutely, in the same way that every empire in history has done. I mean the Pax Romanus and Pax Britannica were times of relative prosperity and ease for those living through them, but the peace under Rome took a hundred years of turmoil to establish and the peace under Britain necessitated the clash of empires including the Dutch, Spanish and French first and was brought to an end at the hands of the Germanic empires.


            But even though they are ******s they attacked?
            And since we are talking about War, expansion through force; innocent people would have been robbed, possibly ****d, tortured, murdered, etc?

            And the same goes for the Romans and other Empires in general?

            Could this be more of a Human Nature thing instead of a something that Is specific to a group, race, or religion?

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Iamnotausername View Post
              Its more complicatec than religion, more to do with the middle east being in such a good stategic position.You control that you control most of the Indian & atlantic trade routes, plus the mediterranean.Very lucrative if u have designs on that sort of thing.
              Short and sweet but totally accurate in general terms.

              I recommend Zbigniew Brzezinsky's "The Grand Chessboard" on an elaborate, yet extremely dry explanation of it.
              Originally posted by JohnCIV6 View Post
              People natuarally feel threatened by middle easterns. It's because of the few *********s out there. People are scared, therfore attack them.
              Idiot, moron, ******, ******ed, dumbass bastard.

              Not even close.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Benny Leonard View Post


                But even though they are ******s they attacked?
                And since we are talking about War, expansion through force; innocent people would have been robbed, possibly ****d, tortured, murdered, etc?

                And the same goes for the Romans and other Empires in general?

                Could this be more of a Human Nature thing instead of a something that Is specific to a group, race, or religion?
                Oh absolutely, it's certainly the overarching quality of our species. We're a social yet territorial animal.

                Comment


                  #48
                  I thought this was hilarious. Please watch it till the end to get a good laugh.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Because most of them don't wear deodorant and charge $3.25 for a g**** white owl

                    Comment


                      #50
                      White Europeans are seen as the best and they like to show this buy raping the other races like they did with africans and indians.











                      I am being sarcastic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP