IDC how much you hate the Right, how can you defend the left at this point?

[travestyny]

It’s very relevant since the man you’re defending has been in the very same government and drafted bills that have hurt you and your people.

45 years vs 2. Let’s say they’re both illegal. Which is worse and who has hurt you and yours more in the process?

LMAO. What the fvvck does that have to do with the topic?

Your silly deflections don't work on me.

Do you need Hur to help you out with this? Man Down needed it. I think you could use it, too. Enjoy.

“Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. ***** allegedly did the opposite,” the report said. “According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.”

“In contrast, Mr. ***** alerted authorities, turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice in 2022 and 2023, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, permitted the seizure and review of handwritten notebooks he believed to be his personal property, and in numerous other ways cooperated with the investigation.”

[-MEGA-]

LMAO. What the fvvck does that have to do with the topic?

Your silly deflections don't work on me.

Do you need Hur to help you out with this? Man Down needed it. I think you could use it, too. Enjoy.

This your boy?

[man down]

The time of retention is not what's relevant. It's the intent that is relevant.

Since you wanted to butt in, I'll let you attempt to answer the question and make a fool of yourself in the process.

Is it worse to find documents, turn them in, and cooperate with further investigation, or try to hide the documents and keep them forever. I'll await your answer and hope you can make it make sense.

Turn them in? ***** used these classified docs to write a book and receive 8 million dollars. He knew he had them for years and didn't return chit until they demanded it.

Why do I feel like everyone here has to explain this to you like you're 6 years old?

[travestyny]

This your boy?

No, it's not. Sorry.

Your desperation is pretty damn funny tho.

You don't want to talk about the topic anymore, do ya

[-MEGA-]

LMAO. What the fvvck does that have to do with the topic?

Your silly deflections don't work on me.

Do you need Hur to help you out with this? Man Down needed it. I think you could use it, too. Enjoy.

It has everything to do with it. That’s “the man”. He stands for everything you’re against and has proven it over a lifetime in politics. Now you’re justifying his actions. It’s crazy.

[travestyny]

Turn them in? ***** used these classified docs to write a book and receive 8 million dollars. He knew he had them for years and didn't return chit until they demanded it.

Why do I feel like everyone here has to explain this to you like you're 6 years old?

Tell it to Hurr. Your new lord and savior. He's the one who says there isn't any evidence of him refusing to return anything. You must feel pretty ****** that the guy whose ass you have your lips all over is the one telling your dumb ass you got nothing

But feel free to keep crying "like a 6 year old." And go read that quote from your boy again, ok

[travestyny]

It has everything to do with it. That’s “the man”. He stands for everything you’re against and has proven it over a lifetime in politics. Now you’re justifying his actions. It’s crazy.

I haven't justified anything. The topic we were just now discussing is classified documents.

I didn't vote for *****. I voted against *****. And Hurr helps explain why that is smart.

“Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. ***** allegedly did the opposite,” the report said. “According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.”

[-MEGA-]

No, it's not. Sorry.

Your desperation is pretty damn funny tho.

You don't want to talk about the topic anymore, do ya

Explain why should ***** should have to assume he wouldn’t be granted the same privileges as every president before him?

again, ***** had documents he shouldn’t have dating back 45 years. But he voluntarily turned them in though…

that’s your argument

[man down]

Tell it to Hurr. Your new lord and savior. He's the one who says there isn't any evidence of him refusing to return anything. You must feel pretty ****** that the guy whose ass you have your lips all over is the one telling your dumb ass you got nothing

But feel free to keep crying "like a 6 year old." And go read that quote from your boy again, ok

Hur is telling us on video. I don't need your lib opinion to confirm what he's literally saying on video.

Your daddy broke the law period. The excuse not to charge him was
1. You can't charge a president
2. He's too old and senile to be charged for the laws he broke.

But somehow he's able to be president. Honestly, you ignoring your common sense is reason enough for no one to even respond to you. You're defending a man that broke many laws and all you can talk about is ***** and what he did.

So in the end, we all know you and dunn will ignore it all because you're so soft that you shill for a old white broken man.

There's no point to respond to you anymore. I've never seen something so obvious be debated.

[travestyny]

Explain why should ***** should have to assume he wouldn’t be granted the same privileges as every president before him?

again, ***** had documents he shouldn’t have dating back 45 years. But he voluntarily turned them in though…

that’s your argument

What privilege are you talking about? You're saying that other presidents had the privilege of stealing documents, purposely hiding them from authorities, and attempting to hold onto them through covert shady schemes?

That's what happened, isn't it? You won't even go near it