Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Omicron now

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    But experts today questioned the pessimistic projection, with one of the country's most eminent statisticians calling the calculation into doubt.

    Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, from the University of Cambridge, told MailOnline: 'To get the figure of 200,000, they would need to assume a doubling time of 1.75 days, or a higher starting point.

    'It is very frustrating, to put it mildly, that such high-profile and surprising numbers are given without any publicly available justification.'

    Professor of medicine and consultant oncologist Karol Sikora added to the criticism, stating the Government was deliberately 'scaremongering' the population into getting booster jabs.

    ‘It’s alarmist and all part of a deliberate PR ploy to get people the booster,’ he said.

    ‘It’s not a bad idea to get the booster, but you could see yesterday the system creaked under the pressure.'

    Comment


      Originally posted by Dakuwaqa View Post

      Is the British Government making ‘all this money’ from boosters?

      The chancellor of the exchequer warned officials today of the multibillion cost of the booster program.

      I have no idea what's happening in other countries. Maybe they should release the contracts? Why haven't they been released? I just know the US is profiting from them and if you're in bed with the vaccine then how can you be sure the data is right? They have a interest in what happens with it right?

      Comment


        Originally posted by man down View Post
        Ya just might want to listen to what he says before you post BS he also goes over his credentials and what he's done before covid. He goes over all that's been said. But hey the Pfizer data speaks for itself.

        I actually think you guys would be shocked at what he says. He said the vaccine WAS working.

        You post: spurious links from various places, lots of which obscure &/or consensus deemed unreliable and misleading sites and sources, and tack it on with your opinion and misinterpretations.

        I posted here: purely a section from Wikipedia with no opinion whatsoever.

        And you have the audacity to call it posting BS. I literally didn't even say anything you nut job.
        You demonstrate time and time again why you are seen as such uncredible on this topic and others sadly. You can't even objectively convey whats being posted without your own extreme biased subjective conjecture.
        Last edited by Kris Silver; 12-14-2021, 02:38 PM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post


          You post: spurious links from various places, lots of which obscure &/or consensus deemed unreliable and misleading sites and sources, and tack it on with your opinion and misinterpretations.

          I posted here: purely a section from Wikipedia with no opinion whatsoever.

          And you have the audacity to call it posting BS. I literally didn't even say anything you nut job.
          You demonstrate time and time again why you are seen as such uncredible on this topic and others sadly. You can't even objectively convey whats being posted without your own extreme biased subjective conjecture.
          Cmon guy you serious?

          Wikipedia Co-Founder: Site’s Neutrality Is ‘Dead’ Thanks to Leftist Bias



          Look, you can read the FDA documents as they have no bias but the fact that they retracted lots of info. But the the information is there. Everything else is just noise.


          I also don't report on covid numbers as those numbers are clear for all to see. The simple fact is, theres more cases now and deaths now than before the vaccine. We also know you can get covid and spread it with the vaccine and breakthrough cases are much higher than first thought. Like we see in locker rooms with players or cruise ships with 100% Vax rate. These are all just facts that need to link. Lots of info to make up your own mind.

          I simply see it as the****utic at best and you see it as a vaccine. Like I said as soon as all these mandates go away and they stop blaming the unvaxxed for the vaccinated getting covid I don't care what happens after that. Jab away with all the boosters I don't care. Do you understand how ridiculous it sounds to say the unvaxxed are giving the vaccinated covid? Lol. If it works or just makes it a simple cold then what's the issue? Get your cold and move on and stop blaming the wrong people that lied to you.

          Comment


            I did post this link.

            The Lancet Scolds Those Claiming "Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated"

            But everyone spouted this BS for a year now.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post


              You post: spurious links from various places, lots of which obscure &/or consensus deemed unreliable and misleading sites and sources, and tack it on with your opinion and misinterpretations.

              I posted here: purely a section from Wikipedia with no opinion whatsoever.

              And you have the audacity to call it posting BS. I literally didn't even say anything you nut job.
              You demonstrate time and time again why you are seen as such uncredible on this topic and others sadly. You can't even objectively convey whats being posted without your own extreme biased subjective conjecture.
              i give up with you guys
              man down man down likes this.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Madison boxing View Post

                i give up with you guys
                Meh don't trip they just name call because they don't want to hear it. Seriously, when has someone like Robbie offered a decent argument without name calling?

                It's pretty clear to see what's going on. Just stay strong in your beliefs.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Madison boxing View Post
                  But experts today questioned the pessimistic projection, with one of the country's most eminent statisticians calling the calculation into doubt.

                  Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, from the University of Cambridge, told MailOnline: 'To get the figure of 200,000, they would need to assume a doubling time of 1.75 days, or a higher starting point.

                  'It is very frustrating, to put it mildly, that such high-profile and surprising numbers are given without any publicly available justification.'

                  Professor of medicine and consultant oncologist Karol Sikora added to the criticism, stating the Government was deliberately 'scaremongering' the population into getting booster jabs.

                  ‘It’s alarmist and all part of a deliberate PR ploy to get people the booster,’ he said.

                  ‘It’s not a bad idea to get the booster, but you could see yesterday the system creaked under the pressure.'
                  Glad to see you posting articles stating that people should get the booster, knew you'd come around in the end.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Clegg View Post

                    Glad to see you posting articles stating that people should get the booster, knew you'd come around in the end.
                    I can only speak for myself. I hope all that want a booster get it. I think there's a lot of confusion about all of this. I have zero issues with you or anyone else getting these shots and boosters. As long as it's not required for those that don't want it jab away.

                    Comment


                      Fauci says it's not the first time a vaccine made a virus worse. Why isn't anyone talking about this?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP