Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle Rittenhouse... NOT GUILTY

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post

    For one, Blake should've never been apprehended in the first place, it's not like he shot 3 people or anything

    Blake was breaking up a fight. Somehow the attention got turned on him.

    If it's ok for Kyle to carry around an AR15 and mow down 3 people, surely it's ok for Blake to have a knife on his key chain, no?
    I'm curious where you guys get this stuff from. I'd understand falling for an initial fake story, but the real one has been about for over a year.

    Blake had no business being there. His baby momma had a restraining order against him. When he arrived her phone call just said "Jacob Blake is here", meaning they already had this guy on file. He then proceeds to finger her saying "It smell like another *igga.

    The police come, he doesn't comply. They use tasers, he shakes off the taser.

    He then proceeds, with her screaming there's kids in the car, to try to get in the car. Whether he was reaching for a knife in the car or was just going to start the car and leave is irrelevant. At that point they can't let dude leave and risk getting into a high speed chase or something with kids in the car. Completely justified shooting.
    Stan Love Stan Love likes this.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Biolink View Post

      I'm curious where you guys get this stuff from. I'd understand falling for an initial fake story, but the real one has been about for over a year.

      Blake had no business being there. His baby momma had a restraining order against him. When he arrived her phone call just said "Jacob Blake is here", meaning they already had this guy on file. He then proceeds to finger her saying "It smell like another *igga.

      The police come, he doesn't comply. They use tasers, he shakes off the taser.

      He then proceeds, with her screaming there's kids in the car, to try to get in the car. Whether he was reaching for a knife in the car or was just going to start the car and leave is irrelevant. At that point they can't let dude leave and risk getting into a high speed chase or something with kids in the car. Completely justified shooting.
      My question is what's the standard? If that's the standard, then how does Kyle get away with mowing down 3 people with an illegal AR15 and walk right past the cops?

      You talk about preventing a high speed chase, but the same cops let an old white guy run over and drag several cops. Not a single shot fired while letting him get away

      WHAT THE FCUK IS THE STANDARD?

      Based on the precedence set on Blake, Kyle should've been shot 20 times and the old white guy shot 40 times + 1 for it being cops

      Comment


        Oh and since you racists like digging up the victims background and using it as leverage to justify their murder, Kyle is on video beating up and abusing his girlfriend

        Headline should've read "wife beating teen who shot 3 people with an illegal AR15 shot 50 times by cops"

        But we know why that didn't happen
        Last edited by Chollo Vista; 11-21-2021, 01:12 PM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
          Oh and since you racists like digging up the victims background and using it as leverage to justify their murder, Kyle is on video beating up and abusing his girlfriend

          Headline should've read "wife beating teen who shot 3 people with an illegal AR15 shot 50 times by cops"

          But we know why that didn't happen
          Again another incorrect story

          He wasn't beating up his girlfriend

          It was a girl that was fighting with his sister

          And the one that got beat up was kyle

          The girl had a 23 yr old boyfriend or guy friend there who was involved too


          BTW since you're a moron, id like to point out that those kind of things from ppl past history are usually not admissible

          Same reason as **** victims ***ual history is inadmissible

          It comes down to relevance to the case
          Stan Love Stan Love likes this.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
            But let's play Devil's advocate.

            How does Blake get shot 7 times in the back for having a knife in his hand, but Kyle walk right past the cops with an illegal AR15 after having mowed down 3 people?

            Schit like this is why America has been burning for the last several years.
            Because Kyle wasn't being arrested, resisting arrest or getting inside a car filled with children?
            Biolink Biolink Stan Love Stan Love like this.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
              Oh and since you racists like digging up the victims background and using it as leverage to justify their murder, Kyle is on video beating up and abusing his girlfriend

              Headline should've read "wife beating teen who shot 3 people with an illegal AR15 shot 50 times by cops"

              But we know why that didn't happen
              Don't be a part of the problem, People talking without knowing the facts. It wasn't his girlfriend. IT was some girl his sister was in a fight with. No it doesn't look good, but he was protecting a sibling FFS.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post

                Again another incorrect story

                He wasn't beating up his girlfriend

                It was a girl that was fighting with his sister

                And the one that got beat up was kyle

                The girl had a 23 yr old boyfriend or guy friend there who was involved too


                BTW since you're a moron, id like to point out that those kind of things from ppl past history are usually not admissible

                Same reason as **** victims ***ual history is inadmissible

                It comes down to relevance to the case
                Not only did he assault the girl, but he's also affiliated with a U.S ********* group




                "Prosecutors are asking the Kenosha County Court to allow evidence they argue shows Kyle Rittenhouse assaulting a teenage girl two months prior to the Kenosha shooting, and shows him associating with the Proud Boys after he was released from jail".

                Of course stuff like that no longer counts to guy's lime you. It only applies to guy's like George Floyd and other blacks

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post

                  Because Kyle wasn't being arrested, resisting arrest or getting inside a car filled with children?
                  That's the POINT dummy

                  He wasn't being arrested while black men have been KILLED for less

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Biolink View Post

                    Don't be a part of the problem, People talking without knowing the facts. It wasn't his girlfriend. IT was some girl his sister was in a fight with. No it doesn't look good, but he was protecting a sibling FFS.
                    Did he assault the girl or not?

                    All of a sudden you guy's rationalize for the white man beating up the girl, but when it's George Floyd, you paint lies and stick to it

                    Again, what's the standard?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post

                      My question is what's the standard? If that's the standard, then how does Kyle get away with mowing down 3 people with an illegal AR15 and walk right past the cops?

                      You talk about preventing a high speed chase, but the same cops let an old white guy run over and drag several cops. Not a single shot fired while letting him get away

                      WHAT THE FCUK IS THE STANDARD?

                      Based on the precedence set on Blake, Kyle should've been shot 20 times and the old white guy shot 40 times + 1 for it being cops
                      The gun was illegal for him to buy, not to openly carry in Wisconsin. They went over it in court briefly and the Prosecution didn't bother with it. The barrel length was sufficient. They all agreed and the Judge tossed it.

                      IDK what you mean by the standard. No offense, but your facts have been off. You're building all of your views on a shaky foundation.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP