Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone watching this George Floyd trial?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

    LMFAO @ the fool grabbing for any last straw to stay up and in this. I am sure that no man has said those words EVER before while being arrested, resisting arrest and then being a little baby once he is taken down. ............Rockin'
    There you go with the insults.

    He was man enough to say something. What were you saying when Derrick Coleman knocked you unconscious?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

      LMFAO @ the fool grabbing for any last straw to stay up and in this. I am sure that no man has said those words EVER before while being arrested, resisting arrest and then being a little baby once he is taken down. ............Rockin'
      Yeah George was a holy terror laying on the ground pleading for his life while handcuffed and being slowly strangled.
      siablo14 siablo14 likes this.

      Comment


        Originally posted by travestyny View Post

        No. That was only from the very end of the encounter, and even that wasn't conclusive. They showed the same pictures to the expert from the LAPD today, and he stated it appears the knee is still on the neck.
        So there is DOUBT, is what you are saying?
        Rockin' Rockin' likes this.

        Comment


          Originally posted by TonyGe View Post

          Yeah George was a holy terror laying on the ground pleading for his life while handcuffed and being slowly strangled.
          So using deadly doses of Fentynal will not make it hard for you to breathe? It is known that it will. And who was strangling him? Was it the drugs or the knee?

          Beyond a reasonable doubt..................Rockin'

          Comment


            Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post

            So there is DOUBT, is what you are saying?
            Not according to everyone who has testified thus far.

            Comment


              Originally posted by travestyny View Post

              I think you can take out the outcome and still come to that conclusion. One of the officers clearly tells Chauvin that he thinks Floyd passed out. He also said he thinks Floyd has no pulse. He continued to stay on his neck after that point. Even before that, the man was begging for his life, and Chauvin stayed on his neck. An officer asked him if they should put him on his side, and he said no. The crowd was yelling that he was killing him. If they all knew it, how couldn't he figure it out? Looks like all of them were right, but the one who received training was wrong. That's counterintuitive.

              I'm not sure if we can say cops do these things all the time with the amount of police that have come forward and simply said this was not something they were trained to do. From the very top to the cops that ran the training sessions that Chauvin took. Also, they have all testified that this was not an approved restraining technique. The most any of them have said is that something somewhat similar is used to cuff an individual, but he was already cuffed.

              But I don't even think it's fair to take out the outcome. Something that keeps coming up is that he would still have a higher chance to survive had Chauvin got off of him earlier, even after he had no pulse. Every second he stayed on him after he passed out obviously lessened his chance for survival. This is going to sound silly, but let's say that a cop tells a cuffed man that he is under arrest, and the man passes out prone on the ground. The cop then puts his knee on the guy's neck for...let's say 4 minutes. Wouldn't you think..."What the hell are you doing???" Just like the crowd. I would say that is certainly assault.
              Like I said, intentional felony assault is going to be a tough sell, just considering the fact he was a cop responding to a crime where the suspect was actively resisting. Now that a witness for the prosecution has said Chauvin could have initially used an even greater level of force, makes things even more difficult. It’s more the duration of the restraint, and Floyd’s response at this point, and being that they had a different vantage point and could say they were also distracted by the bystanders, it could be seen as a case of negligence more than anything.

              Comment


                Originally posted by LarryX.... View Post
                Why does it seem like this case only interest racist who are always being racist on here?
                Lol what??

                The media, white ********, ********ic politicians, and big percentage of black community and entertainers literally made it all about race.

                What r u talking about?
                R u playing dumb?


                Personally me? I don’t see any race in this scenario, especially given one of the police was black himself.


                I see a classic scenario of POS crooked a hole dangerous cop crossing paths with a POS worthless lifelong criminal, and now they’re both off the streets and no longer harming society.


                But of course, that narrative doesn’t generate $27M for anybody. Nor does it help the ********ic Party agenda.
                Last edited by HewJohnson; 04-07-2021, 11:54 PM.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

                  It's comical that you are repeating lies. He never threatened to kill a an unborn baby. The woman wasn't pregnant. Also leaving out that the house they robbed was drug dealers. But the truth doesn't matter to you.
                  So because they were drug dealers they deserved to get robbed and pistol whipped in front of their 1 year old child who was present, and a woman get beat at that?

                  Interesting.


                  So should a lifelong career criminal with no plans on changing deserve to be killed by cops then? Seems like something you’d agree with.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Rockin' View Post
                    ...........Rockin'
                    I’m watching the video you posted, and the guy brings up good points.

                    I’m still bothered by the video of Floyd dying on video.

                    The prosecution witnesses are giving ammo to the defense.

                    When all the evidence is in, and closing arguments, keep in mind that the government gets two bites at the apple. Meaning that the state has two closing arguments but the defense only gets one.

                    Comment


                      Wow. Just looked up the video and seen the angle and seen the statements. Also read George Floyd girlfriend already admitted to George Floyd being a dope dealer and addict who was struggling on drugs.

                      just wow. no words....


                      It doesn’t help that, when you try to research the latest on this case, the typical media sites are already doing their best to withhold the latest info and replace it with a twisted bias narrative.
                      definitely a sign of desperation and guilt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP