Sarms ?

[OctoberRed]

Where do suggest buying the liquid form?

A few places sell it online, but not sure which is more legit than the next.

[lamarclark09]

I also wanted to know about this is there anyone who used this?

[4truth]

It's been a while but, i haven't had the chance to try GW cardarine myself, but I've heard some interesting things about its potential benefits for endurance. It's great to see you doing your homework and seeking out information before diving in. Remember, everyone's body reacts differently to supplements, so it's essential to approach them with caution and possibly even consult with a healthcare professional.

Exactly, proceed with caution. The people in this thread who have used it themselves are no longer with us. just saying...

[IronDanHamza]

If you're going to use Sarms then you may aswell just take proper gear.

That's my opinion on Sarms.

I've used them before, they're alright.

[jaded]

If you're going to use Sarms then you may aswell just take proper gear.

That's my opinion on Sarms.

I've used them before, they're alright.

How would you rate them (specifically, if you don't mind) in terms of effectivity and safety compared to gear?

[IronDanHamza]

How would you rate them (specifically, if you don't mind) in terms of effectivity and safety compared to gear?

I mean depending on the sarm then they have their good benefits (goal dependant), they're way less potent than an actual cycle, with that a lot less damaging to your health but still have their share of risks, you'd still need a run a PCT after a sarm cycle.

Realistically, if using gear correctly, it's not really that unsafe in my honest opinion. Obviously there are risks you take, just like there is driving a car. But with the information we know in 2024, it's difficult to make the mistakes we made in the 80's.

I used PED's for a good 30 years, never had any real issues. Now I run test only and feel great

[ShoulderRoll]

I mean depending on the sarm then they have their good benefits (goal dependant), they're way less potent than an actual cycle, with that a lot less damaging to your health but still have their share of risks, you'd still need a run a PCT after a sarm cycle.

Realistically, if using gear correctly, it's not really that unsafe in my honest opinion. Obviously there are risks you take, just like there is driving a car. But with the information we know in 2024, it's difficult to make the mistakes we made in the 80's.

I used PED's for a good 30 years, never had any real issues. Now I run test only and feel great

Never had any real issues? Haven’t you said that your testes are defective now and can’t produce testosterone naturally?

[IronDanHamza]

Never had any real issues? Haven’t you said that your testes are defective now

Never once said that actually.

and can’t produce testosterone naturally?

Yeah....That comes with age regardless. PED use or not.

If you're advanced in age and don't explore TRT then you're just objectively ******.

You wouldn't know that because you don't have the first clue about PEDs, and have never seen the inside of the gym because you're a fat fuck.

[ShoulderRoll]

Never once said that actually.




Yeah....That comes with age regardless. PED use or not.

If you're advanced in age and don't explore TRT then you're just objectively ******.

You wouldn't know that because you don't have the first clue about PEDs, and have never seen the inside of the gym because you're a fat fuck.

But you specifically said you can’t produce testosterone naturally anymore due to your steroid use. Not due to your age.

You don’t think that qualifies as a real issue?

[IronDanHamza]

But you specifically said you canât produce testosterone naturally anymore due to your steroid use. Not due to your age.

You donât think that qualifies as a real issue?

I have never said I can't produce Testosterone naturally due to steroid use, so you've just lied there.

I can produce testosterone naturally. My Test levels are just lower than average due to consistent PED use therefore use a TRT dose to bring it back to normal levels for a 30-35 year old man. That would be the case whether I used PED's or not, and that's the case for the vast majority of people.

So no, it doesn't qualify as a real issue at all, you fat fuck.

Having below average Testosterone at an advanced age is not only "not a real issue" but it's inevitable in almost all male human beings.

A real issue would be things like liver failure, kidney failure, heart attacks, strokes.

Or various Psychological problems depending if the compound has neuroactive side effects as another example.

Which are all risks you take if you are to explore PED use. Luckily in 2024, as opposed to 1980, we are educated both anecdotally and scientifically on what compounds do what, have a better understanding of dosage control, PCT cycles to combat side effects both long and short, and so on and so forth.

Stop talking about stuff you have no clue about in any capacity, in your mothers basement eating Cheeto's with fried chicken and actually visit a gym for once in your life. Or failing that read a book.