Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo, Spence-Crawford, GGG, Loma-Lopez, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by NearHypnos View Post
    Did Callum Smith just get compared to Bud’s Kell Brook fight?

    Lmao what
    Yes.

    Bread said Callum was equal to or better than Kell Brook.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
      Yes.

      Bread said Callum was equal to or better than Kell Brook.
      Not just Kell Brook. Kell Brook at THIS time.

      I take it he thinks Bud got an equalish win as good as the ring and super mw champ.

      Bread sure loves Bud, huh lol

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NearHypnos View Post
        Not just Kell Brook. Kell Brook at THIS time.

        I take it he thinks Bud got an equalish win as good as the ring and super mw champ.

        Bread sure loves Bud, huh lol
        He loves Bud or has some bias against Canelo. One or the other.

        Comment


          #14
          All due respect to bread, Crawford's resume is paper thin, to call him at the top of his game for 7+ years might be true, but who has he put that talent against, Gamboa is the best name on his resume, yes he won belts, but that was against a bunch of paper champs that are not even around anymore, Jacobs, GGG, Lara, etc etc are still fighting and still relevant. Crawford is very overrated, and didn't Gamboa almost put him on his a**?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
            He loves Bud or has some bias against Canelo. One or the other.
            I know Breadman’s style... trust me, he’s trying. He’s trying to be objective and please his old school followers. He’s also seeing the light and admitting he was wrong before. I see all the subtext. He didn’t have to do that, and yes, I still think submissions are fiction to make his point across.

            At the end of the day, time is limited. Bread is also a fan. He knows as I’ve been saying that Bud vs Spence may have been a waste of time and at the end of the day he knows Canelo is the HNIC. He really can’t say it as so because he’s affiliated to PBC and job security is important.

            He has even turned around the say what we’ve been saying for a long time, that GgG coasted to not rise to the occasion with the Canelo. I assure if Canelo had been replaced with a Black boxer and GGg said, “I like black style, Tyson was monster” blah blah and never showed up against a black boxer as good as Canelo then Bread gets the point.

            Thing is Bread knows Abel said “black fighters don’t sell.” Don’t know why Bread keeps on to praise GGg. Bread even said GGG is a clean fighter... but but he just enrolled in VaDA two weeks out from Szeremeta and was kicked out of SNAC. The same SNaC Jrock was in...

            So u may be right. Bread might just be really cool with Shields and Haymon that he really can’t praise Canelo as it should be.

            But I give Bread a pass. He knows GGG fans are morbidly gay. He knows better

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by FLY TY View Post
              So until that happens, let's refrain from the duck talk. I respect Breadman's acumen as a trainer, and his historical knowledge of the sport, but when it comes to business dealings with 2 fighters, neither of whom he's close to, maybe he should stay away from the subject. Throwing around the word "duck" makes him sound like some of the other idiot posters on boxingscene.

              Especially when Bob, Errol, and even Terence himslef all say the fight happens when the money's right.
              By that same token, it doesn’t take a genius to see that pbc has cornered the welterweight market and can have solid fights without risking any of their stars against Crawford, how is high risk. When Spence says stuff like he’ll take 70-30 or whatever we choose to give him , that doesn’t sound like he really wants the fight. Especially when Porter and Danny Garcia got better cuts than that.

              Comment


                #17
                Yea breadman has great insights expect when it comes to “ducking”.you would think him being in the business he would realize a lot of the ducking fans online cry about is not the case..takes following boxing only a little bit to understand that

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                  Very good article. Very surprised to see Bread have Golovkin vs Munguia being a 50/50 fight. I can't agree with that one at all.
                  Yeah, this was certainly a shock opinion to me. I don't think i know a lot about picking fights well etc but i do know that watching Jaime's last fight i wasn't instilled with confidence he'd beat anyone capable of taking his shots and hurting him back. I thought he was in serious jeopardy of losing to Johnson by the end of the third round. He's NOT fifty/fifty with GGG. Did he mean he thinks the bookies'll see it that way maybe?? They won't either

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    By that same token, it doesn’t take a genius to see that pbc has cornered the welterweight market and can have solid fights without risking any of their stars against Crawford, how is high risk. When Spence says stuff like he’ll take 70-30 or whatever we choose to give him , that doesn’t sound like he really wants the fight. Especially when Porter and Danny Garcia got better cuts than that.
                    I like how everyone is oh so conveniently forgetting that in that same sentence Spence said 60/40.

                    He said 60/40 or 70/30, but everyone acting like he only said 70/30 because 60/40 doesn't suit their duck narrative.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Doubledagger View Post
                      I like how everyone is oh so conveniently forgetting that in that same sentence Spence said 60/40.

                      He said 60/40 or 70/30, but everyone acting like he only said 70/30 because 60/40 doesn't suit their duck narrative.
                      being ridiculous enough to say 70-30 in the first place , after saying 60-40, but lastly saying “or whatever we choose to give him” should let you know exactly where his head is at. He’s not interested.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP