Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Andrew Moloney Legal Battle Continues Over Franco Rematch Outcome

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    Not for a legal punch. For the thumb to the eye.
    With the type of gloves he was wearing that’s considered a legal punch. Did you even listen to the broadcast?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Cobratu View Post
      This guy is looking more and more like a fool. The commission already released the videos and still images of where the butt acured and it was pretty damn obvious.
      No he didn't. You sound like a guy looking for a face in a cloud. Your mind sees what it wants to see but in reality, to anyone who's not bias or subjective, there was no headbutt on that eye. His eye clearly closed because of a punch. I'll bet if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Maloney who got a ND because of a punch causing severe swelling to his eye you'd be crying blue murder.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
        They didn't see anything conclusive enough that night to overturn the ref's call.

        That was the appropriate action in my opinion.

        Here we are weeks later and people STILL aren't certain. So that shows you how tricky this was.
        I understand what you're saying, but it's the wrong measure.

        It should have been conducted as follows:

        - Did you see a headbutt? Yes, in the middle of the first round.
        - Review tape. Do you still see it? No.
        - Award a stoppage victory.

        What they actually did was:

        - Do you still see it? No.
        - Ok, we'll call it inconclusive.

        It's a nonsense isn't it? They concluded that they couldn't find the impact... and used that to come to a decision that the evidence was inconclusive!

        Comment


          #24
          This is turning into the Zapruder film of boxing ffs.

          Comment


            #25
            It's like *****tards. Their leader shouts for nonexistent stuff but because he shouts so loud his idiots believe there got to be something and try making it "tricky" and "inconclusive".

            There is an old joke about such stuff:

            - Marry, why are you so dark looking?
            - That friend of yours. His shoes were so dirty I have to clean these stains on the floor!
            - But Marry, if you look close enough, you see those stains are of the shape of your shoes.
            - ...
            - Why are you still so dark looking?
            - His shape, my shape... But I still got to clean the floor after him!

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP