Originally posted by The Big Dunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NSB Worst Poster of the Decade
Collapse
-
Last edited by juggernaut666; 01-13-2020, 03:29 AM.
-
-
Originally posted by Madison boxing View PostIts funny how u dont have any issues with dunns extremist views, that says a lot about you mate
You didn’t like that not only wouldn’t I change my opinion but that when someone invoked Nelson Mandela that I showed how not getting the land back was his greatest regret.
Me being smarter than you and taking a position about what happened in South Africa that you don’t agree with doesn’t make me a racist with extreme views.
You’re just mad that other posters see you for who you are rather than see me how you want them to. Maybe if you tried the truth you might get different results.
I know I’ve been 100% truthful about you, which is the main reason why so many see you as they do.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 01-13-2020, 06:50 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI don’t have any “extremist views? You lied about something I posted relative to apartheid and land in South Africa. Whatever you posted in this thread about what I said about Loma is a lie and everyone that follows me regularly knows it.
You didn’t like that not only wouldn’t I change my opinion but that when someone invoked Nelson Mandela that I showed how not getting the land back was his greatest regret.
Me being smarter than you and taking a position about what happened in South Africa that you don’t agree with doesn’t make me a racist with extreme views.
You’re just mad that other posters see you for who you are rather than see me how you want them to. Maybe if you tried the truth you might get different results.
I know I’ve been 100% truthful about you, which is the main reason why so many see you as they do.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Madison boxing View PostYoure a racist black extremist. You were condoning the deaths of innocent white families over farms cause 'it doesnt belong to them' when they didn't take it themselves in the first place. Why cant you let bygones be bygones? Rather than suggesting you think the blacks do another form of work, you think the best course of action is murder. And as for justthefacts, his actions and refusal to condone people like you make me think he is a closet racist
LMFAO let bygone be bygones? In other words, over look how the land was acquired by the white farmers ancestors and tell the black families "just let it go its their land now, do something else".
You are lying again. If there is a nonviolent way to get the land back I am all for it and I posted that. If there isn't, so be it. The land rightfully belongs to the ancestors of those that had it stolen from them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostNot because it didn't belong to them but because their ancestors murdered the black farmers ancestors and stole the land under apartheid.
LMFAO let bygone be bygones? In other words, over look how the land was acquired by the white farmers ancestors and tell the black families "just let it go its their land now, do something else".
You are lying again. If there is a nonviolent way to get the land back I am all for it and I posted that. If there isn't, so be it. The land rightfully belongs to the ancestors of those that had it stolen from them.
I'm substantially in agreement that the dispossessed have the right to reclaim what was taken from them - by force as a final resort, but here's a ponder for you... How should the claims of indigenous Americans be treated?
Their livehoods and way of life were destroyed by incoming settlers who had an entirely different concept of their relationship with the land. Should those who live accross their traditional homelands now be expected to relocate and if not, why is there a difference in the two situations?
this is a genuine ponder by the way, I ain't trying to subtly roast ya, I'm honestly not sure how to wrap my moral compass around that one. I suppose a related question is har far back such a claim can go. After all everywhere was someone else's at some point.
What about Israel for instance? Is a 2000 year old claim to land still legitimate?Last edited by Citizen Koba; 01-13-2020, 09:58 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostI'm substantially in agreement that the dispossessed have the right to reclaim what was taken from them - by force as a final resort, but here's a ponder for you... How should the claims of indigenous Americans be treated?
Their livehoods and way of life were destroyed by incoming settlers who had an entirely different concept of their relationship with the land. Should those who live accross their traditional homelands now be expected to relocate and if not, why is there a difference in the two situations?
this is a genuine ponder by the way, I ain't trying to subtly roast ya, I'm honestly not sure how to wrap my moral compass around that one. I suppose a related question is har far back such a claim can go. After all everywhere was someone else's at some point.
What about Israel for instance? Is a 2000 year old claim to land still legitimate?
The thing about South Africa was Madison Boxing was just being his usual racist prick self. He clearly didn't give a **** ass about the situation. Worse, he tried to play ****** about apartheid. He's still mad that other posters called him out for being a vile bigoted scumbag rather than attack me for a position I credibly defended.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Madison boxing View PostYoure a racist black extremist. You were condoning the deaths of innocent white families over farms cause 'it doesnt belong to them' when they didn't take it themselves in the first place. Why cant you let bygones be bygones? Rather than suggesting you think the blacks do another form of work, you think the best course of action is murder. And as for justthefacts, his actions and refusal to condone people like you make me think he is a closet racist
Comment
Comment