Why do people rate Canelo's resume so high, even relative to GGG's?

[Boxing_1013]

I never said that..... so cut the bullshlt

I said there are a pile of guys who Golovkin won't fight





not sure if Golovkin could have beaten Cotto, who was knocking out the same fools that Golovkin was knocking out

I want to know why G avoided that fight

Lololol dude you really do crack me up...some of the 'trolls' (and I say that with love) on here are actually really good entertainment...because they occasionally lift up the mask and wink at ya and kind of let you know that they are just clowning around.

Why would anyone say GGG avoided Cotto lol...that was the 2nd biggest money fight for him after Canelo...he would have jumped at that fight but it never made sense for Cotto...well because GGG probably would have slaughtered him honestly...that is one UD on Canelo's resume that I definitely think GGG KOs.

Cotto was great but was past his best and too small imo for GGG...love him or hate him, GGG showed his whole career that if you didn't have anything to keep him honest enough, he was gonna put you out and it would be within 6 rounds...I don't think Cotto at that age or that weight had close to enough to keep GGG at bay.

I agree with Buddy

[Boxing_1013]

You're trying to claim Monroe is a better win than Trout. You're trolling. You can't be serious.

Golovkin's list is full of C level fighters. It's embarrassing that you're are trying to claim they're as good as Canelo's.


I'll give 100k to whoever turns this clown red.

100% better...he beat him better...and Monroe is better...all Trout has is a UD vs a washed up Cotto...who also lost to Ali lol...Trout has lost every time he faced a decent fighter tbh...I like him...but going 12 with him is not a better win than KOing Monroe in 6.

Lol dude if you really think I care about red K lol.

But seriously if you want to be taken somewhat seriously on this site...go ahead and list that top 10 list....I wanna see you put it in writing so you can personally see your own biases a bit

[Boxing_1013]

I said you can't use fantasy match ups for resumes.

Yes they are different. Lara was far better at staying out of range and fighting off the back foot than Canelo. Lil G ducked Lara for a reason.

Lol..whatever helps ya sleep at night my friend.

Also I really like Lara...but Angulo got to him ya know...seems like someone objective would factor that fight in when addressing his chances vs GGG...

[Boxing_1013]

Golovkin wouldn't have laid a glove on Lara. No point trying to fool anyone anymore, the game is up. Remember all you clowns saying Golovkin was a master at cutting off the ring and Canelo was cement footed? Golovkin showed he's far more "cement footed" than Canelo.

Hey...you may have missed my post from earlier about why fighting Lara would be different than facing Canelo...I know you mean well so I am just trying to help ya understand the game a bit:

'Honestly I have always rated Lara...but comparing cutting off the ring against him to doing it against Canelo or even Jacobs is just odd man...they are completely different fighters and GGG would have fought Lara presumably way differently than he engaged Canelo or Jacobs...he had to be very cautious on his way in against those 2 fellas.'

[Boxing_1013]

Back to excuses about Golovkin being old. He looked back to his prime self again when he fought Vanes, i wonder why? Golovkin was an hype job. He was lucky to sc**** by Jacobs, that fight could have gone the other way. He ducked Lara for a reason. The hype is over man. There's a few of you idiots still trying to fool people but it's not working anymore.


Canelo would have stopped him if Golovkin had the nuts to throw caution to the wind, but no he'd rather survive and cry robbery.

Dude lol...we've been over that it is A hype job bro...I'm starting to think you never really got/get enough attention...so you really feel like you need to get attention now by any means possible...even if it is negative attention.

I just think you would be a lot better off if you kept it a little more real on here and didn't have so much of your self-worth tied up in a fighter or fighters succeeding or failing...just take a step back and a deep breath and enjoy the sport my friend.

Also, on the 2nd bolded part, are you talking about Joshua? lol...but seriously I know that L probably took a lot out of you...but come on man that is no excuse to just go around saying silly stuff...just try and keep it a little more real on here and people will respect you more...and you will have better interactions on here man

[bigdunny1]

100% better...he beat him better...and Monroe is better...all Trout has is a UD vs a washed up Cotto...who also lost to Ali lol...Trout has lost every time he faced a decent fighter tbh...I like him...but going 12 with him is not a better win than KOing Monroe in 6.

Lol dude if you really think I care about red K lol.

But seriously if you want to be taken somewhat seriously on this site...go ahead and list that top 10 list....I wanna see you put it in writing so you can personally see your own biases a bit

You do know Willie monroe lost before he fought GGG to bum Boone right?



Boone who had 17 career losses at the time. Monroe sucks his best win is what Gabe Rosado? Trout best win over Cotto now don't count he was washed up yet went on to beat Sergio the lineal MW and Geale (your bogus GGG listed top win) after losing to trout and winning 2 more world titles while Monroe hasn't beaten anyone as good as Geale EVER. This is lunacy pretending Monroe is in Cotto or trouts class. Old Cotto is still a million times better then never was Monroe. Old Cotto beat Geale worse then GGG did LMAO

[Boxing_1013]

Of course belts and accolades matter in determining the caliber of opponents you dufus. And nobody cares about your selective bs and pretend wins GGG didn't get. In the real world he NEVER beat Canelo he lost. And in the real world bums like Vanes and Rolls aren't considered good or even ok wins. Fact Canelo's opponents achieved more in boxing before and after facing canelo then GGG's opponents. Why is that? The same reason why Canelo's opponents have won more Championships in their career. Hell forget their career achievements and just look at where they were ranked at the time they fought Canelo or GGG. Canelo's opponents were either p4p or universally top 10 ranked. GGG has beaten ZERO top top p4p ranked fighters and very few that were top 10 ranked at middleweight. Rolls, vanes, Wade, stevens barely none of his opponents were top ten ranked when GGG fought them.

Of course you don't want to use real concrete examples of what fighters accomplished or where they were ranked when they were fought because this is some troll bs thread where you created your own make believe land where dragging up a WW up to 160 is a good win but Canelo dragging up a WW to 155 isn't? And GGG beating up Lemieux who had already been beaten and exposed by b and c class fighters before GGG is equal to canelo beating Cotto and trout who were either undefeated or only lost to elite fighters when Canelo fought them. Cotto is washed up yet a washed up Cotto destroyed geale worse then GGG did? Then you bring up dominating wins then refuse to acknowledge that GGG has zero dominating wins against quality opponents. Jacobs was a phuking flash knockdown you clown and many feel even with the flash knockdown GGG lost that fight. Meanwhile Canelo easily beat Jacobs with no controversy. The double standards and absurd lengths you went through just because you are sensitive that Canelo not only beat GGG but broke his face and beat the Mexican style out his azzz but in 1 year already shyt on GGG'S entire legacy at middleweight. Just because you keep repeating a false equivalent don't make it true. There is no universe where Cotto, trout, Lara = Lemieux, Murray, Monroe LMAO

You could repeat it a million times put it side by side in a million lists and guess what it still won't be true. And destroying lesser opponents will be the NEVER be the same as beating better fighters. You don't get extra points for KOing tomato cans

Lol...dude all I asked you was to list your top 10 wins for Canelo..and top 10 for GGG...feel free to contribute if you would like...if you would like to hold back tears while writing a thesis no one will read, you can do that too ...just messing with ya..but yeah post those lists...I already addressed most of your other stuff.

If you really think that just facing a guy because he has a name and going 12...means that is a better win than KOing a good fighter in his prime...I mean Idk what to say...to say that 12 with a shot Cotto, average Trout and great Lara...is better than KOing a very good Murray, good Lemieux and good Monroe...I mean it's honestly hard to believe you are really trying to act like those 3 for Canelo are better than those 3 for GGG imo.

Post those top 10s though please...and btw yes I will give my resume as far as what I see from guys, not what a few blind mice say...I like Canelo but to act like every card he gets as the cash king is accurate...well that is just foolish ya know...I was trying to be charitable by including GGG on his list as a win...but truthfully the next time he beats GGG it will be the first...not really trying to hurt your feelings bc I know you really adore the man but it's just true bro

[aboutfkntime]

I'm not sure he could beat Floyd but I was referring to guys Canelo beat. Cotto never happened because they weren't in the same weight class. When Cotto and Canelo made their fight Golovkin stepped aside to let it proceed. The WBC wanted that fight because it was a natural between two popular Latino fighters. Mexico and Puerto Rico have had a long boxing rivalry so the fight was a natural. I won't get into what happened after but that's my understanding of how it played out.

hold on noddy.....

Canelo had only beaten 153lb Cotto, he had never faced a middleweight opponent..... but you munters insisted that he had to fight G.....

and yet Cotto was the WBC middleweight champ, and he was fighting middleweight opponents..... but you say he wasn't in the same division?

you are an excuse-making muppet

[bigdunny1]

Lol...dude all I asked you was to list your top 10 wins for Canelo..and top 10 for GGG...feel free to contribute if you would like...if you would like to hold back tears while writing a thesis no one will read, you can do that too ...just messing with ya..but yeah post those lists...I already addressed most of your other stuff.

If you really think that just facing a guy because he has a name and going 12...means that is a better win than KOing a good fighter in his prime...I mean Idk what to say...to say that 12 with a shot Cotto, average Trout and great Lara...is better than KOing a very good Murray, good Lemieux and good Monroe...I mean it's honestly hard to believe you are really trying to act like those 3 for Canelo are better than those 3 for GGG imo.

Post those top 10s though please...and btw yes I will give my resume as far as what I see from guys, not what a few blind mice say...I like Canelo but to act like every card he gets as the cash king is accurate...well that is just foolish ya know...I was trying to be charitable by including GGG on his list as a win...but truthfully the next time he beats GGG it will be the first...not really trying to hurt your feelings bc I know you really adore the man but it's just true bro

Fact Canelo's opponents are higher ranked and accomplished more in the sport then GGG'S. Pretending that if you just list names GGG fought and putting that list side by side Canelo's automatically means the opponents are the same is your ****** logic. And beating lesser guys by KO don't equal beating elite guys by decision you don't get extra credit for kos over bums. Your fruity azzz can't even admit dragging vanes out of retirement and off the couch up to 160 isn't a good win. And really just said that Monroe was a better opponent then either Cotto or trout? When none of these guys have a loss on their record to a bum with a current record of 24 wins and 24 losses... seriously go kill yourself with your GGG hat on. I'm dead serious go hang yourself with a old Mexican Style GGG t-shirt you clown fanboy. LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

Lol...why are you so emotional though? lol...if Canelo's resume was really so much superior to GGG's then it would be pretty easy to point out why...and you would think one could do that without getting super emotional...you sound like you're defending your woman of 30 years or something dude lol.

I do think some on GGG's resume would have very possibly beaten Canelo or at least gone 12...maybe when you stop hyper-ventilating over there I will bless you and have an actual boxing discussion with ya

it is extremely simple to point out why

which is why that has been done so many times in this thread

he beat a lot more higher-caliber opponents than Golovkin

/thread

also..... Golovkin has a HUGE list of opponents he avoided

give us that name..... so we can see how you roll

which one of Golovkin's scrubs could have beaten Canelo ?

we know that it wasn't Golovkin's BEST win, Danny Jacobs