Comments Thread For: NSAC Calls 'Bull****' on Claims Canelo Gets Favoritism in Vegas

[P4Pdunny]

what else would he say though

[GlassJoey]

This guy is either clueless or corrupt.

[TonyGe]

Bennett is mostly right

most of that talk is from crybaby casual-fans and punters who lost money

there is a HUGE argument for Canelo beating Lara..... that result is just thrown in there to add weight to a weak argument

the dodo-Byrd card was bad, but not the result of corruption..... it was an awful score, and an indictment on the wide difference in scoring technique employed by different judges

she is old-school..... in a matchup between a boxer and a pressure fighter, unless the pressure fighter is effective she will score for the boxer..... as do most old-school judges, as should be the case

she was correct to a point, imo..... because Gennady was not effective for long periods in that fight..... but I think she got caught up only watching one fighter, which is easy to do

she obviously did not give Golovkin enough credit, especially during those middle rounds..... I think she was just watching Canelo and justified scoring for him off a lot of that defence, deflecting, countering, etc..... Golovkin missed a TON of punches

there may have been an element of personal bias in that, which is of course completely different to corruption

lucky to keep her job

the only real issue is the CJ score

Byrd kept her job, despite the fact that she erred by crediting Canelo too much and/or by displaying personal bias..... but not sure what CJ did

that is the only real issue

crying about vegas is just making excuses for Danny before the fight even happens..... just like everyone who wanted Mayweather to lose did every May/Sep LMAO

She is so far out of step from the other judges that it's a problem. The reasons for the problem can be debated but she has veered wildly from how other judges, media, trainers, fighters and boxing observes score fights. Bob also stated in another interview that they evaluated how a judge scores in relation to their peers. In other words if a particular judge has a habit of being completely out of step. From that you would assume the judge would be deemed not able to meet the standard that the NSAC sets for judging. However that doesn't appear to apply to her.

[Nightfall]

sounds like the guilt is catching up with them

[Liondw]

I'm not sure about Canelo favoritism but of course the cash cow and superstar does probably get a bit of an advantage. Look at Floyd's first fight with Maidana, and close ones which are perhaps tough to score against De La Hoya and Pacquaio. He lost the first fight to Castillo very clearly. We don't deny he was a great skilled boxer, but yeah, decisions were debatable in those. Vegas have always had some dubious scorecards. Even in scoring that is not outrageously bad, as Pacquaio-Marquez 3, that fight was a robbery too, where Marquez was true winner.

[Robi13]

Chew on that haters

[turnedup]

Notice how he talked about his FBI experience with interviewing fighters for taking money under the table..Well ***nett how about your Judges? You monitor where they are staying, you monitor their bank accounts, you ask for their tax filings to find out where every dime they report comes from? Nope, then please STFU. You let Byrd get away with what she did brazenly so.

[Southpawology]

The draw scorecard vs Floyd is all the proof you need lmfao

[Citizen Koba]

My sources revealed to me that Mr. Bob Bennett was indeed a former FBI agent for twenty-four years, whats more telling is that I discovered that Mr. Bennett was the head of the The X-Files unit.

As some of you may know, that department handles cases that have been deemed unsolvable or given minimal-priority status. As such I think we can rest assured that Canelo's score-cards are in the right hands, and we will get answers to these mysterious results, that annually take place in the Las Vegas desert.

[ceylon mooney]

bull****? there is an observable and empirically measurable judging bias in canelos favor.

but u cant rig a decision with one judge. couldnta rigged golovkin-alvarez 1 without don trellas ridiculous draw.