Comments Thread For: NSAC Calls 'Bull****' on Claims Canelo Gets Favoritism in Vegas

[mattr]

Adelaide Byrd (shat).

[Kiowhatta]

Did anyone expect them to do the right thing and own up to all the influence peddling, hush money, late night presents, offshore donations etc?

Of course not! You only admit it when you get caught.

[Oldskoolg]

The trout fight was close, the Lara fight was not, nor was the Mayweather fight

[1hourRun]

My sources revealed to me that Mr. Bob Bennett was indeed a former FBI agent for twenty-four years, whats more telling is that I discovered that Mr. Bennett was the head of the The X-Files unit.

As some of you may know, that department handles cases that have been deemed unsolvable or given minimal-priority status. As such I think we can rest assured that Canelo's score-cards are in the right hands, and we will get answers to these mysterious results, that annually take place in the Las Vegas desert.

[pedrito]

The news would have been Bennett saying "Yes we tried our best to give him preferential treatment",

Them denying any wrongdoing is no news.

[elfag]

The favoritism is there. Clenelo lost the Lara, Trout, and lil G fights. Even though he had the more affective punches in the Cotto fight I actually thought clenelo lost that one as well.

You cant score rounds for chit.

Cotto ran all night and Canelo thoroughly outboxed and outlanded him.

The problem is YOU.

[BigStomps]

The favoritism is there. Clenelo lost the Lara, Trout, and lil G fights. Even though he had the more affective punches in the Cotto fight I actually thought clenelo lost that one as well.

Talk about being a punk ass hater! 😆🤣
But you've been exposed by The Kushking as a total idiot who always goes against Canelo and you're a proven Canelo hater so your word carries no weight you silly hoe!

[R_Walken]

Bennett may not be in the loop , But It’s clear Canelo get preferential treatment when he fights

there’s no other way to explain when Canelos in a fight that could / should go against him That 1 judge scores the fight in Canelos favour so wide it makes it seem the Judge wasn’t even watching the same fight as everyone else or just filled out their scorecard before the fight even started. I mean how can you explain

114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin 1
117-111 Lara
Cotto Scorecards

Those scores are 2-6 rounds in Canelos favour then how the public/media/Industry scored the fight . It’s not that it’s happend once because a A- side with clout will always get those ridiculous scorecards going their way once in awhile . But every time Canelo fights that he should lose or icould be considered close its almost a certainty that 1 judge will just give him rounds just for showing up and a second Judge will bend over backwards to give Canelo more rounds then he deserves when they score his fights

In his entire career so far Canelo has never received a scorecard from even 1 judge that didn’t go his way and went against the public/sports opinion of the fight. No other fighter consistently gets all the breaks in their favour ( Maybe Wilder )

If Canelo was judged like every other fighter his career and would be drastically different.

Bennett can deny it all he wants but even a blind man can see Canelo receives favouritism

[angkag]

You may not be corrupt, but you need to stop appointing INCOMPETENT or maybe corrupt judges, like Adelaide Byrd (****).

And lest we forget, Bennett just included Byrd in his list of suggested judges for the Canelo/Jacobs fight.

[TonyGe]

How the hell is Byrd still there. She is incompetent that's crystal clear.