Basically the same result, sizes, but different styles?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
P4P Rigo vs Loma compared to P4P Mikey vs Spence?
Collapse
-
rigo and loma are supreme boxing technicians
mikey is a well rounded boxer puncher, spence is an athletic seek and destroy fighter
-
-
I think Lomachenko and Rigondeaux are both superior boxers than Garcia who I feel is quite superior to Spence but the styles are very different.
Lomachenko has more dimensions than Rigo who was really a master at the left hand and controlling distance and had the size advantage too if he needed it (he didn’t) whereas Mikey is the superior boxer to Spence but has a size disadvantage and himself not being a slick or mobile boxer with limited head movement will be a sitting duck for a seek and destroy mid range guy like Spence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sugarsmosley_ View Postrigo and loma are supreme boxing technicians
mikey is a well rounded boxer puncher, spence is an athletic seek and destroy fighter
I will admit that, despite the size difference, I expected Rigo to perform better than he did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostI think Lomachenko and Rigondeaux are both superior boxers than Garcia who I feel is quite superior to Spence but the styles are very different.
Lomachenko has more dimensions than Rigo who was really a master at the left hand and controlling distance and had the size advantage too if he needed it (he didn’t) whereas Mikey is the superior boxer to Spence but has a size disadvantage and himself not being a slick or mobile boxer with limited head movement will be a sitting duck for a seek and destroy mid range guy like Spence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostI said Loma had the size advantage if he needed it but he didn’t end up enforcing it.
You either have the size advantage or you don't there is a reason Lomachenko father wouldn't even entertain the idea of Pacquiao fight at welterweight
Comment
Comment